cypherFluff

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

Not a vulnerability review - that’s not what this thread is

This is about centralization risk. And it’s especially relevant because AckiNacki publicly markets itself as "radically decentralized"

I’m not a lawyer, but if a system functions otherwise, there may be grounds for someone to argue that those claims are misleading

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

Diving into #AckiNacki

Surprising and intriguing project

Extends ideas of #TON/TVM first introduced by Nikolai Durov in 2018

Positioning:
- "Fastest Blockchain Possible"
- Novel probabilistic consensus
- Strong team + formal verification
- Radical decentralization

The claims are bold

I'll be digging into the codebase and architecture, sharing what I uncover along the way

https://t.co/6Xtz3Ck8sf
https://t.co/vR81edADgG

[elsirion 🔅 @EricSirion]

Buying cypherpunk internet access with Ecash and Tollgate at #DarkPrague @secondculturecz

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

@vxunderground Haha, classic 🚬

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

Good thing this blockchain hasn’t launched yet. Still some room for improvement

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

ARE YOU KIDDING ME??

#cryptography #consensus #ackinacki

https://t.co/rZFeXbTTVQ

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

Cyphertober! #Uptober

[Marc Lelarge 🌻 @marc_lelarge]

This summer saw significant progress at the intersection of LLMs and formal mathematics.
Here are my slides: 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗟𝗮𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀 from foundational concepts to recent advances.
https://t.co/aRezKTuI5s

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

Been analyzing #AckiNacki. My research shows contradictions between its public claims (e.g., radical decentralization, no team control) and the actual code/architecture.

@Futurizt could you clarify or comment?

https://t.co/xHS7s98mqQ
https://t.co/Fo4h9G71pp
https://t.co/l7MrAv7qHI

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

Network attracts users via an in-app game

Classic p2e mechanics, serving as one of the sources of the native token supply

Right now, the team holds centralized control over the reward modifier

https://t.co/UrdlVHzj4y

`setMbiCur()` lets the root key set the Motherboard reward modifier for any user

This potentially allows the team to compete directly with users for rewards

That conflicts with #5: Satoshi couldn’t decide who earns what

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

@ton_blockchain @seraspaceage wat

[calle @callebtc]

information theory unfortunately says that you can only choose one:

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

@lopp @MARSMEATBARS @Beautyon_ Isn't it enough? one can do many good things with a trustworthy database

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

@GoSolShield Wouldn't rational approach assume a domain specific language for formal verification? Relying just on AI (LLM) at this stage doesn't sound reliable. Good assistance tooling for sure, but not nearly enough

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

Too often, audits fail the common sense test.
One company needs an “audit” to boost its image.
Another company sells audits by the dozen.
Both sides are happy.

Everyone - except the users. Because most of the product usually isn’t covered at all.

Serum passed audits. Wormhole passed audits. The list goes on. The real question: what was audited, and by whose standard?

[cypherFluff @cypherFluff]

AI Hacking is here (unfortunately)

Poorly secured crypto is most at risk.

Anthropic (Claude LLM), reported that cybercriminals were using its tools in large-scale hacking campaigns in August 2025

https://t.co/QVQMNYLYg3