Arcadia makes concentrated liquidity simple. Setting up a fully automated position in just a few steps was never this easy.
1) Find your pool at https://t.co/Iid0QFid7x
2) Select your range, leverage and preferred automations
3) Select ANY asset to deposit
Done.
Arcadia is live on @RobinhoodCrypto !
You can now zap-in, auto-rebalance, stream yield to your wallet and leverage up across many pools of your favourite DEX.
Great work by @chainlink providing reliable pricing data for tokenized RWAs!
@jackieberardo That's just bullshit, the only reason is the finance bros taking over instead of being miserable in wallstreet. They will make SF as miserable as wallstreet.
Had a call this week with one of the bigger DeFi liquid funds. They have pulled out of DeFi lending entirely.
Their reason was,
As a lender, you carry the full notional risk of the position, and you are not paid for it.
On the other side. Borrowers earn looping APRs. And when a collateral asset gets hacked, the RWA issuer steps in and makes the borrowers whole. Lenders eat the loss.
I have been thinking about this ever since.
I get it when a lending protocol gets hacked. That is venue risk. Lenders chose the venue, they bear it. Fair.
But when the collateral itself gets hacked, why is only the borrower saved?
The lender is the reason the issuer has a business. No lending liquidity means no leverage, no looping APR, no AUM growth. The issuer earns because of the lender. The borrower earns because of the lender. And the lender is the one left holding the bag.
If we want institutional money to stay in DeFi lending, both sides need to take the hit when collateral fails. Not just the side that was already being paid better.
Anthropic is so worthless man.
If I can't tell a model 'fuck you' (a normal thing to say when the $200/m thing refuses a low-risk task) then we are not even remotely fucking close to AGI.
"wait but the model has feewings and does better if you say 'I believe in you'!" -- I'm talking to a fucking computer. You are pond scum.