@SaveOurSheriff It's more of a problem of oversight. They could be used for good and all the things that you outlined, but with the wrong people in charge, they can be used for evil. How do you guarantee one and not the other?
@pnwguerrilla I've seen lots of new shooters stand. That way. They need to be corrected, not with yelling or ridicule but just genuine teaching. They don't know what they're doing wrong and they need some help.
I submitted a requisition form for 3 49-inch curved ultrawide monitors.
The total cost was $4K.
Procurement rejected the request within 10 minutes.
They sent a note saying standard protocol limits IT staff to 2 24-inch flat panels.
I immediately drafted a 6-page manifesto on the dangers of peripheral tunnel vision.
I emailed it to the entire C-suite.
I explained that monitoring a dynamic cyber-threat landscape on flat screens causes severe visual fragmentation.
I said when a hacker attempts a brute-force entry, the malicious code moves horizontally across the network topography.
I told them that a 24-inch monitor physically clips the ends of the payload, making it invisible to the naked eye.
I invented a term called "lateral data leakage."
I claimed that without the parabolic curvature of an ultrawide display, our localized firewalls were essentially blind on the flanks.
I included a heavily doctored heat map that showed our headquarters completely engulfed in red warning zones.
The CFO walked into my office 10 minutes later looking terrified.
He asked if we were currently experiencing lateral data leakage.
I squinted at my tiny, inadequate flat screens and sighed.
I told him I couldn't be sure because my field of vision was artificially constrained by legacy hardware limitations.
I said I felt like a fighter pilot trying to fly through a thunderstorm while looking through a paper towel tube.
He immediately bypassed procurement and authorized the purchase on the corporate card.
The monitors arrived yesterday.
I mounted them in a seamless 180-degree arc on my desk.
It looks like the command deck of a spaceship.
I'm not using them to monitor network topography.
I'm using them to play Microsoft Flight Simulator in ultra-panoramic 4K resolution.
I currently have the autopilot engaged somewhere over the Swiss Alps.
I keep a spreadsheet open on the far-left edge just in case someone walks in.
When people ask why the screens show a highly detailed 3D rendering of a mountain range, I tell them it's a topographical representation of our cloud storage density.
They always nod in awe and slowly back out of the room.
Never let corporate policy stand in the way of your immersive gaming experience.
@TheDFSanchez@MAC_Arms I'm not trying to argue. I just wanted a discussion. I live in Tacoma. I have not tried to get one, but was a little interested. I hope you have a good day.