Devashish

Backend Engineer, Distributed Systems

[kalim @akhmxt]

ATS-friendly resume? Arey bhai musalman hoon toh kuch bhi mangoge? Ab main ye anti terrorism squad-friendly resume kaha se laun?

[Devashish @d_ev_ashish]

@Ramesh198707 @sumanthraman and what exactly the underlying issue here let them cheat ?

[Anand Ranganathan @ARanganathan72]

Dr Doolla is an acclaimed professor of Energy Sciences at IIT Bombay. An MTech and a PhD from IIT, he has received excellence in teaching award twice. He recently caught a student cheating. The student committed suicide.

Dr Doolla has now been charged under the SC/ST Act.

[The Math Flow @TheMathFlow]

Solving a Rubik's Cube with graph theory.

[Devashish @d_ev_ashish]

these morons just dont care at all @careinsuranceIN

[Care Health Insurance @careinsuranceIN]

@tanmayrauth Hi Tanmay, we acknowledge your concern and have escalated it internally. We are committed to investigating the matter and ensuring a resolution. We appreciate your patience and understanding.

[Devashish @d_ev_ashish]

@careinsuranceIN

[Tanmay Rauth @tanmayrauth]

My father is hospitalized at Fortis Hospital with a brain hemorrhage, and @CareInsuranceIN has been delaying his claim day after day for 5 DAYS, impacting his timely treatment.

At such an unimaginably painful time for our family, having health insurance that puts us through…

[David Sacks @DavidSacks]

Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead.

You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement.

I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible.

But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who aren’t even at the frontier.

Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want.

Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sanders’ “shut it all down.” China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well.

So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it.

If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture — or an election-season psyop.

[Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) @adamscochran]

So suddenly OpenAI, Anthropic, XAI, and their leaders all suddenly about face and agree to slow the pace of AI development all on the same weekend….

Delaying IPOs and having OpenAI say they would “melt their GPUs to save humanity it it came to it”

Something bad happened…

There is no world in which everyone, including Elon, suddenly started to be worried about this on the same weekend.

There was also a rumor that this week Google cracked recursive AI, which I doubt would trigger this reaction.

Clearly an agent went rogue in a dangerous and malicious way, and it was something severe enough to spook everyone.

[Zachi @iam_zachi]

Huggingfaces security txt after the openai incident 😭

[bubble boi @bubbleboi]

China will win AI simply for the fact that no Chinese researcher is walking around with a stick up their ass saying “AI is going to kill every human on earth.”

Literally -100,000 social credit points and 5 years of hard labor in the country side immediately would fix most of these dimwits. Their whole careers were made poorly writing PyTorch in air conditioned offices and now they somehow have the gaul to say that AI is so dangerous it’s going to kill everyone.

Bro so stop fucking working on it lmao. Delete the weights on the Anthropic server and shut up. I’m so tired of mentally ill people looking for attention man, I’m sorry you got passed over for the promotion and now need to throw a fit in order to justify your existence but why the fuckkkk are you making it all our problem.

Why are you running to Twitter with the AI is going to kill us all take? Fuck you want us to do about it? Do I look like Arnold Schwarzenegger from ther terminator ? Broooo go talk to the Feds lmao stop running to twitter to scare people.

[Pranav Krishnan @pranavkrn]

@EvanHub

[Evan Hubinger @EvanHub]

Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade. I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.

[Nail @NailYourShoes]

“Daddy what were you doing during the singularity, what was it like?”

“Well son I was mostly reading about it on my phone and talking about it in group chats, and otherwise living my life as I ordinarily would have while my friends and family and coworkers completely ignored it”

[Jacob Coxon @hilbertspaess]

I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.

[Sebastien Bubeck @SebastienBubeck]

I would like to clarify a few things:

1) The screenshot is my reaching out to Levent to coordinate our releases. I hope it’s clear from the message that we came in with the best possible intentions.

2) I never ever asked for Levent to be removed from authorship of his own work (as indicated by my text). I was surprised to learn during the call with Tristan that they had only solved Euler and not Navier-Stokes; after learning this we brainstormed possible paths forward. One option we discussed was that Tristan could be the lead author on a rewrite of OpenAI’s Navier-Stokes proof. It is in that context that I said “it would be simpler if Levent was not an Anthropic employee” because I felt it would be inappropriate for an Anthropic employee to author OpenAI’s work. Importantly it was admitted that internal Anthropic models had been used in their proof of Euler blowup; I therefore felt I could not consider Levent to be an independent academic. Another option I wanted to propose (but got cut short) is to offer access to our internal model so that they could try to finish their proof and bridge the gap between Euler and NS. Again I did not know how to navigate giving access to internal OpenAI IP to an Anthropic employee.

3) To reiterate it plainly: as my text clearly indicates, and as I said during our call, OpenAI's intention was to do everything possible to celebrate their mathematical achievements and the heroic efforts that they made on Euler. In the call I was immediately met with a litany of slander, including direct threats that if we were to announce Navier-Stokes he would immediately go to the press with a barrage of unfounded accusations. I refuted all these accusations but he replied “there is nothing you can do, I simply do not trust you”. I was confused why one would turn an incredible source for celebration (of their achievements!) into such bickering, which is when I said that I did not understand why one would risk their career [over unfounded accusations]. Genuinely, at that moment, I was trying to care for him and do a last ditch attempt to get a chance to give them all the credits that they deserve. I deeply apologize for this extremely poor choice of words, it is the opposite of what I was trying to convey. (I should say that I retracted them on the spot by the way.)

4) Overall, on a personal level, it was incredibly difficult to have these conversations. Levent refused to attend any of the meetings despite my repeated asking. As Sholto Douglas said, there will need to be coordination between Anthropic and OpenAI in the future; I felt I was doing a proxy negotiation with Anthropic while the Anthropic employee refused to directly participate.

[OpenAI @OpenAI]

This model represents a step-function improvement on many benchmarks, and its training is ongoing.

Our internal model group arrived at the Navier–Stokes solution in 88 hours, using around 10,000 coordinating AI agents.

Throughout the effort, we maintained the strict safeguards—including monitoring and isolation—that we apply to all our frontier evaluations.

[OpenAI @OpenAI]

We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics.

The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra.

The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.

[minari🔆 @egshels]

Would the world end if they stopped stroking Navier