Medical Scientist | MD | PhD | Environment | Health | Arctic | Social Studies | Ontology | Educator | Science Communication | 政化 | Event pro | DJ @sciensk
@hubermanlab Andrew, with all the respect to your educational work, this conversation is making so much unsubstantiated claiming, I think, it is necessary to debunk all this by a biochemist. Even though, to reveal most of the nonsense on the topic, is enough to have school knowledge...
@BrankoMilan assume, that's just a non-disturbing footage for the most, and it's pretty convenient, as you don't need to clean the room, hiding trousers and messy bed 😁
There is a distinct change in the world's scientific culture during the last few decades. The more information we have should make a developmental impact on scientific knowledge distribution. However, free science seems to disappear gradually.
https://t.co/U976Wn4M8t
Maldevelopment.
The most important reason is that everything in our society becomes a commodity that can be sold in the market. And now we are in a situation where knowledge is also becoming a commodity.
[1|7]
@WarintheFuture it is necessary to abstract from the narrative imposed by numerous publicists about the extraordinary role of a single person in the politics of the state. Still, for Putin personally, no mobilization is of interest as you mentioned above. see the thread https://t.co/T1druRZ8AO
even if we hypothetically give a particular person in the elite structure a leading role in decision-making, the main task for the authorities remains to retain and strengthen control over the resources and territories where the infrastructure of their interest is located.
even if we hypothetically give a particular person in the elite structure a leading role in decision-making, the main task for the authorities remains to retain and strengthen control over the resources and territories where the infrastructure of their interest is located.
if basic resources do not work out, new ones are involved. they don’t need to invade anywhere and overthrow someone, just need control over enterprises and other objects that make a profit.
all is needed - the powers in the territory are negotiable or even better dependent.
Against this background, it is pretty weird for me to observe how people of the same age or even older, and who had the same place of living maintain a "teenage" point of view.
I apologize for this value judgment and didactic tone in advance. Peace🤗
Throughout the week, we observed public reflection of the opinion leaders on Gorbachev. Basically, two vectors are determined: one is the reformist, who granted freedom and opportunities; the other is a traitor who ruined the country and a pawn in the interventionists' hands.
Without trying to look at the whole picture, from the outside, to see global problems and the mechanisms of interconnections between them, succumbing to the reaction and emotional component of local and momentary changes, it is almost impossible.