@ModerateKyle@HorrorGorl No, you asked a brain dead question. You got an answer. Followed up with a brain dead statement. Just to make an your idiotic anti immigration post. So yes, you are an idiot for asking a question that any person with an IQ higher than 70 understands.
@ModerateKyle@HorrorGorl You people literally come online to make yourself look like an idiot. It doesn’t matter if you can buy a plane ticket to go to another country. You have to get approved by another country to live there. Which varies by country and is much more than most people have saved.
@ModerateKyle@HorrorGorl Because leaving a country isn’t as easy as saying, “ok I’m leaving”. You have to secure a job, or have the money to secure a visa. A visa is basically a sponsor. Either you get one from a job or sponsor yourself with your savings.
@BalesBets@ryKeough You also over complicate it a little. There’s no need to remove the defender. If the same thing happened by the ball simply hit the ground instead of ending up in the defenders arm. It would still be ruled incomplete everytime. No need to remove the defender. It’s a simple ruling
@ILikeBigDecks If the ball hit the ground instead of ended up in the defenders arms it would have been ruled incomplete not a fumble. Therefore, he obviously never had possession.
It’s incredibly simple if you take the buffalo tinted glasses off.
@MorrisBubba@SamiOnTap Because stat watching will do that. The total points also include defensive and special teams points. The offensive has very clearly fallen off a cliff late in the season. Darnold's play as well.
Will need more than the mediocre offense we're seeing to complete a Superbowl run
@mmatesky@BayouThrottle@GridIron_Geek_@SeattleONTap You are not very smart. That is how the rule was applied. CJ Stroud never ran himself into the endzone. He ran backwards, got contacted at the 1 yard line and fell back into the endzone. Refs ruled he never retreated past the one. I'm a Seahawks fan. Not complicated.
@mmatesky@BayouThrottle@GridIron_Geek_@SeattleONTap He’s clearly stating that the contact occurred at the 1. Therefore, the refs ruled his forward progress ended.
Whether they interpreted the rule incorrectly can be debated. But you’re trying to argue about interpretation of a rule.