@vannykounga I think you missed the point. If this small experiment directly leads to a larger resistance in the future = results, would we still consider that first instance as ineffective?
In summary of both intro arguments, pro points to an effective individual resistance to Facebook whilst con points to an ineffective resistance to Facebook as a whole. However, at the end of the day, the argument isn't about the individual. #cse252d4days
@tinotendapetros @tinotendapetros they gave examples of autonomy being "when a bullet leaves a gun and misses its target", "when a heat seeking missile misses its target". Firstly, a bullet is not autonomous. Heat seeking missiles are. However, whether or not they miss their target is irrelevant.
"Facilitate autonomous weapons in a moral way" - if anyone knew how to conduct weapons of mass destruction "in a moral way" I don't think we would be having this debate. #cse252d3laws
@Con so now if I have to google something, someone else should have made me aware in the first place? I donโt think any of us would have finished high school if we relied on that logic. #cse252d1priv
@Emanuel32187181 That is true but not for all services. Have you ever been on business insider or other advertisement based websites? Enabling cookies is mandatory. You consent or you donโt consume. @cse252d1priv
@Pro companies use data in the same way they handle their business: a lot of numbers. The meaning is in the โnutritional details.โ Otherwise privacy just looks like a text document in windings. #cse252d1priv