@PosRondaAnfield Msalahnya, batas sbrp lama dianggap active phase itu gak dijelasin di rulebook ifab(cmiiw) , pokoknya slama bola gk direcover lawan itu kan. Jdi ya ini murni subjektif wasitnya. Kasus serupa jg beberapa kli terjadi kok cuman ya ini karna argen menang aja jdi rame, biasalah
@ruangtaktik Kenapa dianggap offence yg gak "worthy" of var callback Pdhal leading to goal? Trus sblm gol ke3, pas salah jatuh, emang bener itu kejadian 1:1 dg lisandro , shg layak dianggap foul lwt VAR callback bahkan potensi pinalti? Monggo diskusikan
@UTDTrey Ngga showed the video yet still cant see that julian got the ball first, then contact happened. Maybe see from normal angle and tell me honestly if you still think its a foul, like be honest.
@Gideoomatic Broski did u even see from normal angle and this angle that julian won the ball first and this contact happened? This what you call a penalty worthy foul? Really?
@PorosHalangID Setiap kali Argen menang, selalu ada wacana Wasit. Kyk gk bisa menerima kenyataan klo Argen memang lbh unggul scr permainan, chances, dan mental. Yasudalah, risiko pemain besar ya gitu, sama kek CR7.
@cenkuygur Its not about not wanting to play, but upholding RULES and LAws. There has been no cases where the freaking HEAD OF STATE or any govt body influenced FIFA directly to overturn onfield decision, until USA, the self "righteous" country. Classic americans, egoistical bunch of ppl.