With so many deaths from shootings there is an excellent way to track the bullets used in crimes and find the shooter. Tracking chemicals combined with the metal. The cost would be less than a quarter of a cent per bullet
Ask your Congress representatives and
Please Retweet
20 years after being dubbed @WSOP Player of the Year, Jeff Madsen @JeffMadsenobv still knows how to draw a crowd at the final table of the $1,500 Dealer's Choice.
@shawndeforce@mgrapes@TheBestPanda00 The rating system for the dealers has a fault. It awards prizes per tournament? A short period. When 1 person talks about a good dealer the whole table rates them 5. These rallys of votes will determine the winners. If there's no talk then equally as good dealers get no votes.
@ICEMAN_NY@ManOfTheLibrary@WSOP The rating system for the dealers has a fault. It awards prizes per tournament? A short period. When 1 person talks about a good dealer the whole table rates them 5. These rallys of votes will determine the winners. If there's no talk then equally as good dealers get no votes.
@JonShoreman@WSOP@wsoptweets@GGPoker@WSOPLiveAction@jeffplatt The rating system for the dealers has a fault. It awards prizes per tournament? A short period. When 1 person talks about a good dealer the whole table rates them 5. These rallys of votes will determine the winners. If there's no talk then equally as good dealers get no votes.
@rexjen123@GTO_Diaper@WSOP The rating system for the dealers has a fault. It awards prizes per tournament? A short period. When 1 person talks about a good dealer the whole table rates them 5. These rallys of votes will determine the winners. If there's no talk then equally as good dealers get no votes.
@shawndeforce@Angelajordison The rating system for the dealers has a fault. It awards prizes per tournament? A short period. When 1 person talks about a good dealer the whole table rates them 5. These rallys of votes will determine the winners. If there's no talk then equally as good dealers get no votes.
@JohnnieVibes@Amo4sho The rating system for the dealers has a fault. It awards prizes per tournament? A short period. When 1 person talks about a good dealer the whole table rates them 5. These rallys of votes will determine the winners. If there's no talk then equally as good dealers get no votes.
@Kenna_James The rating system for the dealers has a fault. It awards prizes per tournament? A short period. When 1 person talks about a good dealer the whole table rates them 5. These rallys of votes will determine the winners. If there's no talk then equally as good dealers get no votes.
@rickykroesen The rating system for the dealers has a fault. It awards prizes per tournament? A short period. When 1 person talks about a good dealer the whole table rates them 5. These rallys of votes will determine the winners. If there's no talk then equally as good dealers get no votes.
@SavagePoker@padspoker@SpaceyFCB Changed my mind on this answer. It is +EV , but not advisable. If you play well from the beginning your +EV can be +150% rather than +20% for this late registration. Taking out casino juice and forcing players to take the blind on entry certainly pushed this to -EV.
@loosepassive@tombos21@SavagePoker@padspoker@SpaceyFCB Changed my mind on this answer. It is +EV , but not advisable. If you play well from the beginning your +EV can be +150% rather than +20% for this late registration. Taking out casino juice and forcing players to take the blind on entry certainly pushed this to -EV.
@loosepassive@tombos21@SavagePoker@padspoker@SpaceyFCB Changed my mind on this answer. It is +EV , but not advisable. If you play well from the beginning your +EV can be +150% rather than +20% for this late registration. Taking out casino juice and forcing players to take the blind on entry certainly pushed this to -EV.
@loosepassive@tombos21@SavagePoker@padspoker@SpaceyFCB Changed my mind on this answer. It is +EV , but not advisable. If you play well from the beginning your +EV can be +150% rather than +20% for this late registration. Taking out casino juice and forcing players to take the blind on entry certainly pushed this to -EV.
@tombos21@loosepassive@SavagePoker@padspoker@SpaceyFCB Changed my mind on this answer. It is +EV , but not advisable. If you play well from the beginning your +EV can be +150% rather than +20% for this late registration. Taking out casino juice and forcing players to take the blind on entry certainly pushed this to -EV.
@dajerseyboy@SavagePoker@padspoker@SpaceyFCB Changed my mind on this answer. It is +EV , but not advisable. If you play well from the beginning your +EV can be +150% rather than +20% for this late registration. Taking out casino juice and forcing players to take the blind on entry certainly pushed this to -EV.
@claytoncomic@SavagePoker Changed my mind on this answer. It is +EV , but not advisable. If you play well from the beginning your +EV can be +150% rather than +20% for this late registration. Taking out casino juice and forcing players to take the blind on entry certainly pushed this to -EV.
@SavagePoker Changed my mind on this answer. It is +EV , but not advisable. If you play well from the beginning your +EV can be +150% rather than +20% for this late registration. Taking out casino juice and forcing players to take the blind on entry certainly pushed this to -EV.