If you're writing CLI apps in Go and want something (imo) more streamlined and idiomatic than the popular lib, try https://t.co/98Td2qfjC4
Simple setup, POSIX-friendly flags, operand handling, nice default and customizable usage.
I'm not deep enough into diets to truly know, but, going by my basic knowledge, that should be good. It's not about avoiding carbs, it's about avoiding carbs without fiber, protein, and/or fats in reasonable enough amounts to minimize blood sugar spikes. I feel tremendously better overall. Though, to be fair, my genetics have me more susceptible to insulin resistance.
We have some severely odd cruft in the craft of software development. No one, in their right mind (in my opinion) would purposely create a systems language by starting by designing a browser scripting language. Nor by designing an HTML templating language (Php). However, due to the naivety of our craft, we ended up with those things without much thought. Python (designed to glue C code) makes a bit more sense in that regard, but it's still wonky from an engineering perspective.
Using scripting languages as if they are systems languages is literally like using popsicle sticks to build a house by bonding them together into lumber. It's far more sensible to start with lumber and only use popsicle sticks when the need is small. That is, we should be, and this is a novel idea here... we should be limiting scripting language use to scripting.
This topic is a really good example of where software engineering is preventing itself from being a "real" form of engineering. We can and should do better.
Which better fits the condescension of YHWH, the kenosis of Immanuel, and the direct attribution of authorship of all things to God.
https://t.co/qPs53CsqZP
In the same way that God forms the light, and shapes it, and darkness appears where the light is cut out, God produces completeness, and sustains it, and evil appears where the completeness is cut out.
Isaiah 45:7 was carefully worded, as is this post.
yฤแนฃar
bฤrฤ'
สฟฤลรข
bฤrฤ'
The more I become comfortable with the relevant concepts, the more I feel a different term from "Creatio ex nihilo" fits my understanding. I think I'm going with "Creatio ex velato, nam velum umbras creat"
I am not a Calvinist, but I am a Monergist, and it seems clear you'd likely put me in the same box as Calvinists.
Psalm 33:15
he who fashions the hearts of them all and observes all their deeds.
The various nitpicky doctrinal differences like Creation Ex Nihilo are useful distractions for some, not very interesting in this particular thread of posts. Eternal Progression, as it applies to God, is simply not based on Christian scriptures. Even regarding His children, there is no Christian basis to say that we will eventually form new worlds and have offspring in the nature as God. We are explicitly promised face-to-face communion, and eternal life, etc. Kolob builders we are not, nor will we be.
I am not a Calvinist, but I am a Monergist, and it seems clear you'd likely put me in the same box as Calvinists.
Psalm 33:15
he who fashions the hearts of them all and observes all their deeds.
The various nitpicky doctrinal differences like Creation Ex Nihilo are useful distractions for some, not very interesting in this particular thread of posts. Eternal Progression, as it applies to God, is simply not based on Christian scriptures. Even regarding His children, there is no Christian basis to say that we will eventually form new worlds and have offspring in the nature as God. We are explicitly promised face-to-face communion, and eternal life, etc. Kolob builders we are not, nor will we be.
@Alma56_47@EagarEphraimite@Grownded My will is my own, it is from the heart-mind (i.e. soul) that was given to me.
The pattern of carnal thinking is far more aligned with people believing that they are the authors/reauthors of their own hearts rather than the Lord who is the only High Priest.
I understand that you believe that a man has authorship/authority over his own heart.
When the scriptures say that...
- man's heart is deceitful, I agree with that.
- the Lord's sheep will not believe, I don't reverse that into them not being sheep because they don't believe.
- Christ is our only and true high priest, I do not take claim to any spiritual goodness in me and make myself a co-high priest.
- a man can only have what has been given to him, I do not claim to be the source of anything.
It's a good thing Judas didn't change his mind and do good, Christ would've looked like a total goof.
@EagarEphraimite@Grownded You're shadowboxing here. In your opinion, a creator who exercises true authority/authorship is not all-loving. In your mind I have called MotCoJCoLDS demons.
@EagarEphraimite@Grownded What is there to rebut? Your opinion and personal feelings? Ok. I disagree that a potter doing as they wish with their creation is satanic or sadistic, and I disagree that a potter owes their creation some particular thing.
@EagarEphraimite@Grownded Not only is your post inaccurate, where it is accurate, the only reason for objection is personal opinion/feelings.
https://t.co/oz2FBhIf3N
@daveddev@Grownded rrrrright.
our theology teaches Jesus loves us
your theology teaches he creates people who he knew would disobey him. then puts them in a place/time where theyโd never hear the gospel. then he sends them to hell to burn, eternally.
we agree. huge glaring incompatibility.