@r_tallarita Same. It seems doubtful that AI works the same as a human brain given its training and development, but since we know very little about how the brain works, it is possible.
The evidence for some kind of attack is based on patients who have documented brain injuries. The fact that we can’t explain how they occurred means only that we don’t know the precise mechanism. But the injuries are real
https://t.co/RIevBcGyRW
The RAPID program’s attempt to unify reimbursement and authorization decisions for devices with clinical trial data is laudable. However, it presents several concerns for patients, public health, and taxpayers. | Forefront
@david__simon, et al. | @NUSL
https://t.co/mghZC29sHc
HHS recently announced it intended to start a new program, RAPID, to attempt to harmonize some authorization and reimbursement decisions for certain medical devices. We describe the program, its potential, and its challenges here:
https://t.co/z3t25TwGqN
when i was interested in becoming an academic, a senior academic told me reading a paper is a serious investment of time. and he was right. asking someone to read a paper means the reader assumes a level of effort orders of magnitude larger than the reading.
AI writing is so obvious. Do people either think that no one will notice or not care? I find it very hard to want to read someone's AI-generated article. I have no idea what they did or whether they've invested enough in it for me to spend the time reading it.