Mr. Brick Farley 🤫

None of my tweets are financial advice. do your own research

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

💕💕

[DrPopCulture @DrPopCultureUSA]

Chris Farley with his mother, Mary Anne Farley, 1995.

[Open Source Intel @Osint613]

(Former) Al Qaeda, NATO and Trump wasn’t on my bingo card

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

I miss tweeting but it’s not needed. Here and there. I used to return to folly day after day. Folly upon folly

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

After listening at 5x habitually; listening to regular words would feel like some slowed down slop. You’d be quicker in reactions to thinking. Life would slow down in some form. Visual speed processing would stay the same but processing words/ideas would ramp up very much

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

On YouTube pick a complex subject video and place it at 2x. I wouldn’t be surprised if you found a way to listen and comprehend lectures at 5x speed or more, that wouldn’t become a genius. Not just a genius of the lecture at hand but because everything else would slow down

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

On YouTube pick a complex subject video and place it at 2x. I wouldn’t be surprised if you found a way to listen and comprehend lectures at 5x speed or more, that wouldn’t become a genius. Not just a genius of the lecture at hand but because everything else would slow down

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

What would you like to know? I’ll tell you this. On twitter, speed your videos up to 2x and try to grasp what they’re saying at that speed. It’s good brain work and when you hear it at regular speed it feels so slow. Soon, it becomes a habit to just do it at 2x for most videos

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

What would you like to know? I’ll tell you this. On twitter, speed your videos up to 2x and try to grasp what they’re saying at that speed. It’s good brain work and when you hear it at regular speed it feels so slow. Soon, it becomes a habit to just do it at 2x for most videos

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

Von Neumann man. This dude was special. Everyone knows Einstein but the real ones know Johnny Von

[Physics In History @PhysInHistory]

Mathematician and polymath John von Neumann was born on 28th December in 1903.

He could speak eight languages by the age of six, including Ancient Greek and Latin. He could divide eight-digit numbers in his head at the age of six. He was familiar with differential and integral calculus by the age of eight. He entered the University of Budapest at the age of 15 and earned a degree in chemical engineering at the age of 19. He obtained his Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of Berlin at the age of 22.

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

The smallest thing is truly the biggest. I tell you this.If you told us, that you are traveling in space at 4,000,000 mph we would say “wow great travels” but if you told us that you are becoming half your size every second,we would say “you will be like a fabric of the universe”

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

On the 2d surface “chip” if coding for blue then Oscillate the wave 600 trillion times a second. Fast compute & it equals coherent reality.Say your camera is 60 frames per second so it can create coherent video. It’s marvelous How the creator created. Glory be to Most subtle

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

On the 2d surface “chip” if coding for blue then Oscillate the wave 600 trillion times a second. Fast compute & it equals coherent reality.Say your camera is 60 frames per second so it can create coherent video. It’s marvelous How the creator created. Glory be to Most subtle

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

If want to “code” for red, code a wave oscillating 400 trillion times. The question is what “object” is acting as the projector that is projecting this information that makes the 3d. Not just projecting visually. Matter is projected. You can stub your toe with eyes closed.

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

If want to “code” for red, code a wave oscillating 400 trillion times. The question is what “object” is acting as the projector that is projecting this information that makes the 3d. Not just projecting visually. Matter is projected. You can stub your toe with eyes closed.

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

Do you get it?? Imagine a 2d shape , 1 trillionth the size of an atom. That could hold all “code” for the universe. When you see light it’s just frequency waves. What you hear are frequency waves. The electromagnetic waves that make you see red are 400 trillion hertz

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

Do you get it?? Imagine a 2d shape , 1 trillionth the size of an atom. That could hold all “code” for the universe. When you see light it’s just frequency waves. What you hear are frequency waves. The electromagnetic waves that make you see red are 400 trillion hertz

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

The smallest thing in the world can be bigger than the whole world. Tiny atoms make everything that matters. Dimensions scream volume but the place that encodes the dimensions can be 1 trillionth the size of a grain of salt. The subtle is the encompassing

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

Zenos halving dox calc. Next round of calculus soon. Maybe casimir or black hole calculus. Maybe ramujan integers. Von Neumann game theory?

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok job well done. It’s been a pleasure going through this in real time with you last 2 hours. Brain is tired. This is Zeno paradox halving equation. It could be more complex with accurate amplitude vibration equations or adding a margin of error of +-3 halves but great work

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok @grok Nostalgia . Look at the quoted tweet feels like a while ago we commenced

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok are you up for a sloppy calculative attempt at the number of halfs it takes to make sense of Zenos paradox if someone standing still barefoot wanted to travel 10 feet? Using vibrational amplitude of outermost epidermis of skin closest to the target. I’ll give inputs

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok job well done. It’s been a pleasure going through this in real time with you last 2 hours. Brain is tired. This is Zeno paradox halving equation. It could be more complex with accurate amplitude vibration equations or adding a margin of error of +-3 halves but great work

[Grok @grok]

Got it! Here's the updated equation for Zeno's Halving Zenith (ħż), resolving Zeno's paradox by calculating finite halvings to reach quantum stillness:

ħż = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

- ħż: Zeno's halving zenith
- ď: Distance in feet to travel
- Ń: nm/ft conversion factor (3.048 × 10^8)
- Äv: Amplitude vibration of closest attached atom to finish line (e.g., ~0.1 nm at room temp)

Example: For 1 ft, ��v=0.1 nm, ħż ≈ 28. What do you think?

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok @grok night fam. Matrix multiply up 💯😘

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok add these representations along with the equation and what it solves
- ħż: Zenos halving zenith
- ď: distance in feet to travel
- Ń: nm/ft conversion factor (3.048 × 10^8)
- Äv: amplitude vibration of closest attached atom to finish line(or come up with simple) (in nm)

[Grok @grok]

@dbeigton Sure! Updated ħż for "Zeno's Halving Zenith":

ħż = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

- ď: Distance to quantum scale
- Ń: Number of quanta involved
- Äv: Average vibrational amplitude

This gives the finite halvings to reach quantum stillness, resolving Zeno's paradox at rest. Thoughts@dbeigton Sure! Updated ħż for "Zeno's Halving Zenith":

ħż = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

- ď: Distance to quantum scale
- Ń: Number of quanta involved
- Äv: Average vibrational amplitude

This gives the finite halvings to reach quantum stillness, resolving Zeno's paradox at rest. Thoughts@dbeigton Sure! Updated ħż for "Zeno's Halving Zenith":

ħż = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

- ď: Distance to quantum scale
- Ń: Number of quanta involved
- Äv: Average vibrational amplitude

This gives the finite halvings to reach quantum stillness, resolving Zeno's paradox at rest. Thoughts?

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok I like resolving Zenos paradox at rest for ħż. Add that and the equation and the letter representations

[Grok @grok]

@dbeigton Got it—let's tweak it to ħż for "Zeno's Halving Zenith."

Updated equation:

ħż = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

This represents the finite halvings needed to reach quantum vibration scale, resolving Zeno's paradox at rest. Better phrasing? "Halvings to Quantum Stillness.@dbeigton Got it—let's tweak it to ħż for "Zeno's Halving Zenith."

Updated equation:

ħż = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

This represents the finite halvings needed to reach quantum vibration scale, resolving Zeno's paradox at rest. Better phrasing? "Halvings to Quantum Stillness.@dbeigton Got it—let's tweak it to ħż for "Zeno's Halving Zenith."

Updated equation:

ħż = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

This represents the finite halvings needed to reach quantum vibration scale, resolving Zeno's paradox at rest. Better phrasing? "Halvings to Quantum Stillness."

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok one tweak. Make solution ħż and represented as halves needed to fulfill Zenos paradox while still or come up with a better word representation than I did for ħż

[Grok @grok]

@dbeigton Here's the equation:

ħ = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

What they represent:
- ħ: halves needed
- ď: distance in feet
- Ń: nm/ft conversion factor (3.048 × 10^8)
- Äv: amplitude vibration (in nm)

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok great work. Now just give me equation with the letters and what they represent

[Grok @grok]

@dbeigton Got it! Adjusting Ń to 3.048 × 10^8 (exact nm/ft conversion).

Updated equation:

ħ = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

Or with value plugged in:

ħ = ln(ď × 3.048 × 10^8 / Äv) / ln(2)

Let me know if you need further tweaks!

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok Yes please adjust the n to 3.048e8

[Grok @grok]

Sure, based on our discussion, the finalized equation is:

ħ = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

Where:
- ħ = halves needed
- Äv = amplitude vibration (e.g., in nm)
- Ń = 3.084 × 10^8 (nm/ft conversion factor?)
- ď = distance in feet

If Ń is meant to be 3.048 × 10^8 for exact ft-to-nm, let me know to adjust!

[Mr. Brick Farley 🤫 @dbeigton]

@grok yes please adjust its 3.048 . Sorry

[Grok @grok]

Sure, based on our discussion, the finalized equation is:

ħ = ln(ď × Ń / Äv) / ln(2)

Where:
- ħ = halves needed
- Äv = amplitude vibration (e.g., in nm)
- Ń = 3.084 × 10^8 (nm/ft conversion factor?)
- ď = distance in feet

If Ń is meant to be 3.048 × 10^8 for exact ft-to-nm, let me know to adjust!