Bing Ang

An Atheist who likes to travel sometimes...

[Bing Ang @dbing3]

I love this city #shanghai

[橙色熊猫 @xiongmaoxuanchn]

Me while reading how western Europeans don't have air conditioners from the comfort of my air-conditioned home in China

[🇨🇳XuZhenqing徐祯卿 @XueJia24682]

✨🇨🇳A Chinese content creator installed an air conditioner in his dog’s living space to keep his pet cool in summer.😂

[Carl Zha @CarlZha]

Chinese people find the AC debate in France and EU hard to understand when even pigsty in China has AC:

[𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐖𝐓𝐘𝐌𝐄 🇨🇳🇺🇸⚜️ @DetroitShowtyme]

I’m leaving CHINA! “I am sick and tired of this place…this place is hopeless”

These are the recent words of the infamous “Professor” Jiang in Beijing.

@Jerry_grey2002 predicted Jiang would not last through the summer at his school in Beijing.

That prediction just came true.

I have predicted that NOT only will Jiang be leaving China, but once he does, he will be astro-boosted to become the most famous Chinese Anti-China critic in modern social media history!

Jiang is poised to undoubtedly surpass Gordon G. Chang as the most extreme and hyperbolic anti Communist Sinophobe popular amongst the West.

Jiang foreshadows his plans to be more “forthcoming” about China—suggesting he’s been hiding the truth.

If you want to know what he’ll talk about, I have his entire script, all discretely telegraphed in advance, hidden clues in random comments of his videos from over the years.

Just watch my full multi thread breakdown of an anti Chi Com supervillain in the making!

Please retweet, like and share your thoughts!

[Ishaan khosla @Ishaankhosla44]

The story behind that day! @LewisHamilton @ScuderiaFerrari

#rememberwhoyouare

@simscircuit

[QINTELPRO @QINTELPRO_]

In 1839, Chinese Imperial Commissioner Lin Zexu confiscated and destroyed 20,000 chests of British-controlled opium in Canton - approximately 1,400 tons.

He wrote a letter to Queen Victoria asking her to stop the trade: “Where is your conscience? Let us ask, where is your conscience?”

The Queen never responded. Instead, Britain sent warships.

The First Opium War (1839–1842) was not a war over trade disputes or diplomatic insults. It was a war to force a sovereign nation to accept the importation of an addictive narcotic that was destroying its population - because that narcotic was the most profitable commodity in the British Empire’s Asian trade.

This thread is the story of how the world’s most powerful empire went to war - twice - to protect a drug cartel’s revenue. 🧵

[Dr. Luke in China @96Stats]

Lol such a dumb article by the BBC clearly written by a casual journalist and not AI expert. They claim ‘extraction’ as if querying Claude plus suspicious attribution PROVES model theft. It does not. They give no direct evidence that any Qwen model was trained on the outputs, no before/after benchmark, no leaked dataset, no training run, no model-similarity analysis, and no internal Alibaba document..

A black-box user does not get Claude’s weights or its training data or internal activations. They literally only get input-output examples. That can produce a behavioral imitation on selected tasks, but it is not the same as reconstructing Claude.

The scale also needs context. If there were 28.8 million exchanges over about 45 days, that is around 640,000 exchanges per day and about 1,152 exchanges per account on average. That is large as API abuse, but small compared with frontier pretraining. Just check Qwen3’s technical report whichh says Qwen3 was pretrained on about 36 trillion tokens. So doing the maths if each Claude exchange averaged 1,000 tokens, 28.8 million exchanges would be about 0.08%of that 36T-token pretraining scale; even at 5,000 tokens per exchange, it would be about 0.4%. So BBC should not imply that 29 million chats can simply “recreate Claude.”

It also makes no sense why Alibaba would do this when they have such a serious AI stack. Qwen3 was released as an open-weight model family, with genuine competitive performance in coding and maths which I’ve tried for some projects. Their white papers are really clever with some great model architectures. Anthropic also benefits if policymakers treat foreign distillation as theft, national-security risk, or sanctionable conduct… so there’s a clear motive for them to make these claims too.

It just seems so groundless and for it to even make sense Anthropic would need to prove so many things like attribution evidence (Ips, payment methods, proxy infrastructure and internal identifiers tying the activity to Alibaba or Qwen, not merely to Chinese users or proxy services). Also training-use evidence like prompts and outputs formatted as training data. Ablation evidence too like Alibaba model performance improving on targeted tasks after the alleged period.

None of those have been offered in the evidence which just makes all this circumstantial and …so dumb by both Anthropic and the BBC.

[Jason Smith - 上官杰文 @ShangguanJiewen]

China didn't "force" companies to give up their technologies.

Rather, foreign companies knowingly signed technology transfer agreements in exchange for access to skilled Chinese labor.

If those companies didn't want to transfer aspects of their technology, they didn't need to sign. These were decisions made by the CEO's and the boards of directors of those companies. These were decisions made by corporations.

FT's framework maligns China's government for decisions made by foreign companies trying to get into China's manufacturing hubs.

That's slander, not reporting.

Context matters.

[BlackPanthaa @BlackPanthaaYT]

Yes that was the problem, the marketing team 💀

[Bing Ang @dbing3]

Damn straight!!!

[Abi Go @abigoabi]

Nürburgring is where car legends are born. Today, no driver needed.

[Andy Boreham 安柏然 @AndyBxxx]

Grok is done playing along with the anti-China lies 😂

From @RepPatFallon's fake “CCP espionage” spin getting instantly debunked, to @TheEconomist exposed for shameless spamming… and Xinjiang propaganda roasted in real time.

Facts > Propaganda!

WATCH:

[Arnaud Bertrand @RnaudBertrand]

The funniest part of this post is that, if Unitree gets banned, it's not like it would "support American robotics" as they write: there is simply no US humanoid robot you can buy today as a consumer.

Banning it would just mean Americans can't have a humanoid robot, period.

[Seyed Mohammad Marandi @s_m_marandi]

A Zionist airstrike has just targeted a densely populated area in Gaza City, murdering a teenage girl.

We are dealing with monsters.

[Michelle @D162Michele]

I thought the war in Iran was supposed to cut off China’s oil supplies?
How’s that going?

[Andy Boreham 安柏然 @AndyBxxx]

The hukou system simply means that someone gets subsidized education, cheaper healthcare and other benefits only in the place of their hukou.

It is really not as your AI graphic makes out, not surprisingly.

The hukou system limits EVERYONE geographically. A person with a Beijing hukou, for example, can only get subsidized public services in Beijing. Same as a Shanghai person or a Chengdu person or anyone else.

I have a friend who lives and works in Shanghai but has Tianjin hukou. When he needs to go for an annual health check etc, he tends to wait until he goes home to visit his family, because then it's free.

Or he could simply pay for the health check like anyone else in Shanghai who doesn't have Shanghai hukou. That could be someone from Shenzhen, or some from a small village in Hubei province.

This is simply designed to keep public services from being flooded in more developed areas. It balances public services out across the country.

And it is NOT difficult to change. There are many policies to change hukou, in fact I have many friends who have gained Shanghai hukou despite being born elsewhere.

One friend from out of Shanghai has Shanghai hukou now. His parents in Shanxi just retired and moved in with him in Shanghai, and he's trying to convince then to change their hukou to Shanghai so they can enjoy the benefits. His parents refuse because they are proud of their hukou.

I think you should read more Chinese sources and stop diving into cheap propaganda just because it makes you feel better about your own predicament.

[Bing Ang @dbing3]

Worth watching!

[Andy Boreham 安柏然 @AndyBxxx]

⚠️I just want to reshare my documentary on the China to Laos railway. 🚆

I think we did a pretty good job!

If you haven't seen, please support by giving it a watch:

[Sweet Summer Shunü (甜夏淑女) - BIRTH 💍💖⭐💖💍 @SweetSummerSN]

The subhuman TGTM has been ratio'ed

[𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 @OopsGuess]

This kind of public feud looks childish, but it reveals something deeper.

American politics has normalized personal humiliation as a form of diplomacy.

Trump does it crudely, like a reality-TV bully.
Biden did it too, when he publicly called Xi Jinping a “dictator.”

Different style.
Same culture.

The point is not diplomacy.
The point is domestic performance.

U.S. politicians have learned to turn foreign leaders into props for their own audience:
insult them, moralize over them, humiliate them, then call it “standing up for values.”

Trump humiliates allies because he thinks protection money gives him ownership.
Biden insulted China’s leader because Washington needs moral superiority to justify containment.

This is why U.S. diplomacy increasingly looks like campaign theater with aircraft carriers.

Respect is conditional.
Allies are clients.
Rivals are villains.
And every serious relationship gets dragged into America’s domestic political circus.

[Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 @jacksonhinkle]

Israel is STILL bombing Lebanon.

F*ck Israel.

[Seyed Mohammad Marandi @s_m_marandi]

The criminal Zionist regime is carrying out massive strikes on residential buildings in the Lebanese city of Nabatieh.

Western media calls these "Hezbollah strongholds" and "Hezbollah targets" to justify the slaughter of women and children.