Danny Cartwright

photography, f1 and support the British military, member of RBLR and motorbikes.

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 BREAKING: THE COLLAPSE IS COMPLETE.

Sadiq Khan has just flown all the way to Singapore and flat out refused to back Keir Starmer to stay as Prime Minister.

When asked twice on live television if Starmer should keep his job, the London Mayor completely dodged the question. 🤡

Instead, he immediately started pushing for Andy Burnham ahead of the crucial by-election this Thursday.

The vultures are officially circling Downing Street and they are not even trying to hide it anymore.

First his Cabinet ministers resign, and now his own mayors are actively backing his biggest rival to replace him.

Keir Starmer is the ultimate political squatter barricaded inside Number 10, completely abandoned by his own party.

They are entirely obsessed with their own toxic Westminster civil war while the rest of the country collapses.

Do not let them gaslight you. This government is dead in the water.

RT if you are completely sick of this corrupt circus and want our country back! 🔁🇬🇧🔥

[Sacred Britannia @sacredbritannia]

🚨UPDATE : Not only may Keir Starmers social media ban be in breach of Article 8 it may now also be in breach of Article 10 of the ECHR.

And yes the ECHRs rights extends to children.

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

@Keir_Starmer You just can't fucking help yourself can you?

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Sixteen Year Olds Get the Vote. They Do Not Get X.

Today Keir Starmer announced a ban on under-16s using ten social media platforms. TikTok, Instagram, Threads, Facebook, X, YouTube, Snapchat, Reddit, Twitch and Kick. Bluesky is not on the list. Neither is Discord.

This matters because of what we know about both platforms, and because of what Australia did about one of them. Bluesky has publicly acknowledged a "predictable uptick" in child sexual abuse material as its user base grew, serious enough that it partnered with the Internet Watch Foundation to deal with it. Discord was the subject of an NBC News investigation that found hundreds of active servers being used to groom and exploit children, a finding its own chief executive called "horrifying." The Australian government, the model Britain says it is following, agreed with that assessment of Bluesky. It was added to the restricted list there in November 2025, with the same minimum age of 16 that applies to the rest of the ban. The UK's preliminary list does not include it.

This is not a case of Britain simply replicating that approach. The policy has been described as "Australian-style" and "Australia-plus," going further on curfews and chatbot restrictions than the original. On the one platform with a documented child safety problem that the original restricted, Britain has chosen to diverge. That is not an oversight in a policy carefully benchmarked against another country's model. It is a choice.

X, meanwhile, made the list. The government itself uses X. So do the Green Party, the Liberal Democrats and Your Party. None of them are leaving the platform, yet figures from all four have called for tighter restrictions on it or for it to be banned outright. What changed is not who uses the platform but what gets said there and who says it. Footage of the Belfast stabbing first spread on X to millions of people within an hour of it happening. The government's record on immigration, asylum and policing is challenged there daily, by people it cannot easily silence. Bluesky, by contrast, has become known as a space where that kind of challenge is rare. The platforms are not being separated by risk to children. They are being separated by how comfortable the political class is with what gets said on each.

A government can claim this is coincidence once. The pattern across this entire policy says otherwise. Yesterday it emerged the announcement had been brought forward by weeks. Ian Russell, Molly Russell's own father, could identify no reason for that beyond the Makerfield by-election. Today it emerges the platform list does not track the evidence of harm, even when that evidence comes from the government's own template. Reem Ibrahim of the Reason Foundation has already asked the obvious question. Is this overt political censorship. Sources tell the Guardian the government may face judicial review over precisely this inconsistency.

Then there is the contradiction nobody in government has addressed. Starmer has discussed extending the vote to sixteen and seventeen year olds, on the basis that they are mature enough to weigh arguments and choose a government. The logic of this ban is that the same sixteen year olds cannot be trusted to read X without the state intervening on their behalf. A government that believes both of these things at once does not have a coherent theory of childhood. It has a theory of which platforms it would prefer young voters not to encounter before an election.

The timing was political. The platform list, sparing on its own template's terms the platform that most deserved scrutiny, is harder still to explain. This was never only about Molly Russell and child safety. It is about who gets to talk to whom, and when, in the run-up to an election this government is increasingly afraid of losing.

"Bluesky has publicly acknowledged a "predictable uptick" in child sexual abuse material as its user base grew"

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

@RightSide_Uk That's exactly what I'm expecting. All they are going to be taught is everything labour.

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 A "BIG MOMENT FOR OUR COUNTRY."

Good morning to the millions of everyday Brits waking up to a new digital prison.

Keir Starmer has just officially announced his blanket ban on social media for teenagers!

He literally stood at a podium, rambled on about his childhood in the 1970s, and claimed he is doing this to keep your kids safe. 🤡

You honestly have to laugh at the sheer delusion.

He completely refuses to protect our actual streets from violent criminals, but he is completely obsessed with policing your family's phones.

Do not be fooled for a single second!

To enforce this ban, every single adult in Britain will now be forced to upload a passport or digital ID just to browse the web!

This is not about child safety. It is a massive Trojan horse for total state surveillance.

RT if you see right through this scam and refuse to let the Labour elite control us! 🇬🇧🔥

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

@Keir_Starmer You'll have no problem finding the pdfs, they'll all be flooding to blue sky! It's not about safety at all is it?

[David Shaw @David90shaw]

🚨 YOU HONESTLY HAVE TO LAUGH AT THE ABSOLUTE HYPOCRISY.

As I have been warning all week, Keir Starmer is desperately trying to lock down your internet and ban social media.

But look at what he is doing behind closed doors today. 🤡

He is literally begging Donald Trump for a special exemption from the new American ban on Anthropic.

Starmer wants to restrict exactly what you are allowed to see and say online, while demanding unrestricted access to the most powerful technology on the planet for his own government.

It is one rule for the globalist elite and a digital prison for the rest of you.

RT if you see right through Two-Tier Starmer and refuse to let them control us! 🇬🇧🔥

[HJB News @HJB_News__]

2022: Labour Leader Keir Starmer claims at PMQs that Alaa Abd El-Fattah was ‘imprisoned for his social media posts’.

2025: Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer claims he did not know about those social media posts?

He’s the biggest liar that’s ever been in British politics.

[Artur Nadolny @ArturNadol7566]

UK GOVERNMENT SACKED ITS OWN BORDER WATCHDOG

David Neal was the man the government hired to inspect UK borders and make sure they actually worked. He did exactly that. What he found was not good. He wrote it all up in official reports. The Home Office locked those reports in a drawer.

When he finally went to a newspaper to warn the public that private planes were landing in the UK with almost nobody checking who was on them, the Home Secretary James Cleverly @JamesCleverly fired him.

Here is what Neal actually found.

At London City Airport, only 21% of flights flagged as high risk were checked by immigration officers.

Not some of the time. As a yearly average.

He said it was a scandal and dangerous for the country.

The Home Office said he had the numbers wrong. Then they fired him.

At the moment he was sacked, the @HomeOffice was holding back 15 of his finished inspection reports. Some had been sitting there for 18 months without being shown to the public.

The agreed deadline for publishing them was eight weeks. Not one report met that deadline across his entire three years in the job.

When they finally released 13 of the reports, they chose to do it on the same afternoon that a separate major inquiry published its findings... Draw your own conclusions.

What was actually in those reports? Border control posts left with nobody manning them. Officers at e-passport gates described as distracted and without basic radios. The whole airport border operation rated as neither effective nor efficient.

Neal told MPs directly: I have been sacked for doing my job.

He also told @BBC the Home Office is dysfunctional and described senior officials rolling their eyes when he brought them his findings.

He said the government contacted him three separate times warning him not to speak publicly about the unpublished reports.

He had almost no other way to get the information out.

The people who fired him for raising border security concerns were the same people who spent years promising the public they had taken back control of the borders.

Sources: @BBCNews @guardian @DailyMail @CommonsHomeAffs

[Jim Ferguson @JimFergusonUK]

https://t.co/0eekH4cytV

🚨 BREAKING: THE UK GOVERNMENT IS COMING APART

John Healey resigned.

Al Carns resigned.

Now Pamela Nash resigns from the Defence Ministerial Team.

Her warning?

"The trust of the public" is being damaged.

When ministers start walking out and talking openly about collapsing public trust, you know this is no ordinary political crisis.

The pressure on Keir Starmer is intensifying by the hour.

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

@Keir_Starmer You've backed the nation into a corner, have you seen what happens when you back a lion into a corner?

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

@Xmusknewsx Nope!

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

.@Keir_Starmer, your statement says you have absolutely no tolerance for abhorrent scenes of violence like this on our streets.

With respect, tolerance is not the issue. Nobody tolerates a near beheading on a residential street in Belfast. The question your statement carefully avoids is prevention. And prevention requires honesty about a pattern your government has consistently refused to name.

A man in his thirties, a Somali national, pinned a man to the ground on a residential street and stabbed him repeatedly in the face and neck. Members of the public intervened with a hurling stick. A woman required hospital treatment for the stress of witnessing it. This happened in Northern Ireland, a place that has known more than its share of violence, and even there residents said they had never seen anything like it.

Your government has presided over record small boat crossings. It has failed to proscribe the IRGC despite repeated promises. It has blocked the grooming gang inquiry for a year before being forced to concede it. It has spent £10 billion on asylum accommodation contracts. It has actively resisted measures that would have reduced the number of unvetted individuals entering and remaining in this country.

The victims of these attacks are not statistics. They are British people, going about their lives on their own streets, who were failed before the attack happened. Failed at the border. Failed by a system that prioritises the rights of those who arrive illegally over the safety of those who were already here.

Your thoughts are with the victim. So are ours. The difference is that thoughts are not policy. Thoughts do not secure borders. Thoughts do not remove individuals with no right to be here. Thoughts do not protect the next victim, whose name we do not yet know, on a street we cannot yet identify, from an attack that has not yet happened.

How many more before the thoughts become action?

[BritMatters 🇬🇧 @britmatters]

Labour’s Two-Tier Sentences Exposed.

On 23 July 2024, Muhammad Amaad, 26, and Mohammed Fahir Amaaz, 21, were involved in a violent clash at Manchester Airport. Shocking CCTV footage showed the brothers punching and kicking police officers, including a female officer punched in the face, leaving her with a broken nose.

Two trials. Two hung juries. In May 2026, the CPS ruled a third retrial was not in the public interest. The brothers had been bailed for much of the process. Starmer watched the footage and expressed concern at the time, but there was no sustained push from Number 10 to fight for the officers or the public good.

On 29 July 2024, Lucy Connolly, a mother and wife of a local councillor, posted a furious, expletive-filled rant on X in the raw aftermath of the Southport child murders. She called for mass deportations and said: "Set fire to all the f*cking hotels full of the b*stards for all I care." It was viewed hundreds of thousands of times before she deleted it.

She was refused bail, the case was fast-tracked with counter-terrorism lawyers involved, and she was pressured into pleading guilty to stirring up racial hatred. Starmer’s government demanded rapid action on online incitement during the riots. In October 2024 she was jailed for 31 months. She served part of it before release on licence. No suspended sentence. No sympathy for being a first-time offender or a mother.

Early 2025, Chaudhry Zaman, 70, approached a 12-year-old girl walking home from school in Slough, Berkshire. He forcibly held her hand, kissed her, and told her to cover her head while sexually assaulting her. The victim spoke of lasting trauma, crippling anxiety, lost friendships, and major changes to her daily routine. She even regretted coming forward because of the backlash.

In February 2026, Judge Amjad Nawaz gave Zaman a nine-month suspended sentence, 80 hours unpaid work, a five-year restraining order, and put him on the sex offenders register for 10 years, citing his age and lack of previous convictions. No government fast-track. No Starmer statement demanding a review. A child was assaulted on a public street, and the system chose leniency.

June 2026, protests erupted after the murder of 18-year-old Henry Nowak and controversial bodycam footage. Connor Bishop, 24, picked up a traffic cone and threw it towards police. Along with Reece Robinson, 21, and Noah Etherington, 18, they were pressured into pleading guilty to violent disorder. Bail was refused. All three were immediately remanded in custody ahead of sentencing at Southampton Crown Court on Monday. Custodial sentences are expected.

Starmer condemned the protests, dismissed two-tier claims, and the government’s full force of the law on disorder kicked in at speed.

Labour’s Two-Tier Sentences Exposed.

Under Starmer’s watch, Britain’s justice system is extremely selective.

Brothers filmed brutally assaulting police officers walk free after the CPS drops the case.

A working-class mother who vents online in grief and anger gets fast-tracked to prison.

An elderly migrant who sexually assaults a 12-year-old girl on the street receives a suspended sentence and walks free.

And white working-class lads throwing traffic cones during a protest over two-tier policing are immediately remanded in custody with years behind bars almost guaranteed.

This isn’t justice. This is bullshit.

#UKNews #UKPolitics #CrimeNews

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

@StephenMorganMP We're skint!

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

Demand justice for Henry Nowak: charge the officers, publish the findings - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/6h5dnS5L9a via @UKChange

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

Demand justice for Henry Nowak: charge the officers, publish the findings - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/k8Ze59M21L via @UKChange

[Danny Cartwright @dccartwright73]

@UKLabour We know what you're doing and it's not keeping us safe!

[The British Patriot @TheBritLad]

🚨WOW: Hundreds gather in Scarborough, Perth, Australia, to honour murdered British teen Henry Nowak.

They take the knee in tribute and proudly wave British flags high.

Australian patriots stand strong with Henry Nowak. 🇬🇧🇦🇺