Thanks to @FoxNews for using our site at https://t.co/zN6TLV9G8O to cite their H-1B investigation!
So happy more mainstream media are talking about this.
Use our site to look up any employer, by county, filing for H-1B employees over Americans.
DeSantis just exposed the birthright citizenship myth.
In 1924, Congress had to pass a special law to make Native Americans citizens.
If ‘born on U.S. soil = automatic citizen’ was the rule, why the statute?
The 14th Amendment never meant instant citizenship for everyone dropping a baby here.
This is the real time bomb: Every day without mass deportations, thousands more anchor babies become instant citizens.
They grow up, vote, chain-migrate their families, and permanently shift the country left.
Delay = irreversible demographic replacement, exploding welfare costs, and cultural collapse.
Fix birthright citizenship. Deport at scale.
Tick… tick… tick…“
@nypost How many laid off were H1B visa holders vs. American citizens? Let's get the numbers. Not a single American should be let go before a foreigner in this country.
They Dont Work for You
One Simple Law: Prohibit any company that has laid off American workers in the past 24 months from sponsoring new H-1B visas.
If you are firing citizens you do not get to import replacements. This ends the cycle of mass layoffs followed by quiet visa hires that has devastated tech and engineering fields.
@marklevinshow This is very disheartening as an American citizen. Seriously how much time and money must be spent to get this loser out of the country?
🚨ISLAMIZED BRITAIN’S POINT OF NO RETURN: Muslim Population Hits 4.4 MILLION – Over 6% of the Country
This is Demographic conquest....
Here’s what happens when the Muslim population grows (historical pattern repeating across Europe – and now Britain):
1% or less: Peaceful minority image.
2–3%: Recruitment ramps up (prisons, gangs, disaffected youth).
5%: Sharia pressure begins – demands for halal food in schools/supermarkets, prayer rooms, Islamic dress codes, special accommodations, and harassment of politicians.
We are now at 6%… and the acceleration is unstoppable without immediate action.
At 10%: Increased lawlessness explodes. Complaints turn into riots and threats. Non-Muslim “offenses” (cartoons, free speech, criticism of Islam) trigger violence, car burnings, and street chaos. No-go zones multiply. Politicians start pandering to the Muslim voting bloc. (See France and parts of Sweden today.)
At 15%: The tipping point hits hard. Major riots become routine. Jihad militias begin forming. Sporadic attacks on non-Muslims, churches, and institutions spike. Demands for Sharia patrols and parallel societies intensify. Political power shifts – they start winning local councils and influencing national policy. (This is where India’s trouble zones and Lebanon’s collapse began.)
At 20%: Frequent riots, organized jihad militias, and direct attacks on non-Muslim institutions. Ethnic tensions erupt into open conflict. Non-Muslims flee areas. Sharia enforcement in Muslim zones becomes de facto law. (Lebanon went from Christian majority to civil war hell at this level.)
At 40%: Widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and full militia warfare. Entire regions fall under Islamic control. Non-Muslims face daily persecution.
At 60%: Persecution of non-believers, ethnic cleansing, Sharia law fully enforced, and jizya taxes imposed on remaining infidels.
At 80%+: State-run ethnic cleansing and genocide. The drive to 100% Muslim is relentless.
At 100%: The “peace” of Dar al-Islam – everyone submits or dies.
There is NO coming back from these numbers. High birth rates, chain migration, refusal to assimilate, and parallel societies mean Britain is sleepwalking into irreversible Islamization.
No-go zones, grooming gangs, riots, and Sharia creep are already here – and it only gets worse at 10%, 15%, 20%, and beyond.
The Muslim Council of Britain celebrates this as “cultural and religious diversity” and “significant” contributions while calling for “strengthened peaceful coexistence.”
But what does “peaceful coexistence” REALLY mean when THEY say it?
In Islamic doctrine, “peace” (salaam) is NOT equality or mutual respect. It means total submission to Islam. Quran 8:39 commands fighting until “the religion, all of it, is for Allah.”
Treaties with non-Muslims are temporary hudna (truces), breakable whenever it benefits Muslims, as Muhammad did with the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah.
True “peace” only arrives when non-Muslims convert, pay the jizya tax as subjugated dhimmis, or are eliminated.
No reciprocal coexistence. Just dominance.
Britain – Stop the invasion, enforce assimilation or deportation, or watch your country disappear.
Illegal Monday- Update to debanking of non-citizens
Back in April we posted about how the government was moving to require banks to verify citizenship and legal status for accounts, while ICE began sending formal notices to those here without documentation that they owe money for failing to leave after final removal orders.
That post is now playing out in real time.
The Treasury Department continues rolling out the citizenship verification requirements for financial institutions. At the same time, ICE is actively issuing failure-to-depart fines - some at $1,000 per day - to people with standing deportation orders who refuse to leave. ahem.. they just added several hundred thousand to that list. Boy are they going to be shocked when they are sent bills. It could be another great way to pay down that debt too.
Meanwhile, those being told to return to their home countries... They could have serious issues staying here. Yes, this will include those told to leave and wait for green cards applications.
The next logical step is becoming clearer by the week: once accounts tied to individuals who cannot prove legal status or who have ignored removal orders are identified, asset seizure (bank accounts, vehicles, property) becomes a very real enforcement tool.
This is how we start clawing back what was taken from American taxpayers - trillions spent over the years on benefits, healthcare, education, housing, and enforcement that never should have been necessary. They are unlikely to give folks a heads up... especially if the plan is to 'freeze or seize' accounts. Fines have to be paid after all.
For years we watched remittances, welfare, and uncompensated care drain the system while American workers were pushed aside. These quiet, systematic steps are the beginning of reversing that flow.
It’s not complicated. It’s just long overdue.
We are watching a carefully planned and strategized execution come through one phase at a time.
Previous Post Reference (April 2026): https://t.co/nQrhaHgfEc
Recent Updates:
U.S. Department of the Treasury Executive Order on Verification of Citizenship and Legal Status (March 2026) https://t.co/4Ddh1atkUb
ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Report on Failure-to-Depart Notices (February 2026)
At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions.
Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place.
The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin.
Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not.
Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese)
On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days.
One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads.
I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard.
Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general.
When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it.
I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this.
I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity.
I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc.
But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.
@ChiefEngineerCE@jasonryanmd I am so enjoying your intuitive comments to these people who don't care about the job market and future for actual American citizens.
@FmrRepMTG Given enough? He stopped representing his constituents and had his own agenda. Both of you got rich off a less than 200k salary. Answer how.
Nobody voted for this and nobody would yet...
Congress allowed the Social Security trust fund to be used for benefits paid to non-citizens who never paid a full career into the system.
Our parents and grandparents paid payroll taxes their entire working lives expecting the money would be there for American retirees.
Instead the fund is being drained faster by people who contributed far less or nothing at all.
While non-citizens do pay into Social Security through payroll taxes, many draw benefits (or have U.S.-born children who do) without a full lifetime of contributions. Meanwhile, means-tested welfare use is dramatically higher among immigrant-headed households: 53% vs 37% for U.S.-born households, with non-citizen households at 59% (Camarota & Zeigler, Center for Immigration Studies, 2026).
Generations that built the program with decades of contributions are the first ones getting shortchanged.
We were promised these systems would be protected for the people who funded them.
Nobody would have voted for this.
Citations:
Key points from DOGE’s findings and related reporting (early 2025–2026):
They discovered millions of non-citizens receiving Social Security numbers through the “Enumeration Beyond Entry” (EBE) program, with numbers jumping dramatically in recent years (from ~270,000 in FY2021 to over 2 million in FY2024 according to charts presented by DOGE).
DOGE has flagged cases where non-citizens (including some with temporary or questionable status) are accessing or positioned to draw benefits, particularly Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and disability payments.
They have emphasized that many non-citizens are receiving benefits or having U.S.-born children who qualify, while contributing far less in lifetime taxes than native-born Americans who paid in for decades.
Musk and DOGE allies have described it as part of broader waste, fraud, and abuse in the system, with improper payments going to people who should not be eligible under strict rules.
New data shows once an Indian CEO gets hired at a major company, what follows is Americans getting pushed out of their jobs and replaced by Indians
Major Companies with an Indian CEO:
- Google - Sundar Pichai - Indian
- Microsoft - Satya Nadella - Indian
- YouTube - Neal Mohan - Indian
- Adobe - Shantanu Narayen - Indian
- IBM - Arvind Krishna - Indian
- Infosys - Salil Parekh Indian
- NetApp - George Kurian - Indian
- Arista Networks - Jayshree Ullal - Indian
- Novartis - Vasant Narasimhan - Indian
- Micron - Sanjay Mehrotra - Indian
- Honeywell - Vimal Kapur - Indian
- Flex - Revathi Advaithi - Indian
- Niyafair (Wayfair) - Niraj Shah - Indian
- Chanel - Leena Nair - Indian
- Shantanu Narayen (Adobe) - Indian
- Cognizant - Ravi Kumar S. - Indian
- Cognizant (variant/duplicate) - Indian
- Vertex - Reshma Kewalramani - Indian
- Escaler Indian
- Zscaler - Jay Chaudhry - Indian
- Microsoft Gaming - Indian
- FedEx - Indian
“There's an observable correlation between the rise of Indian-born CEOs taking the helms at major U.S. companies and increased offshoring and outsourcing activity to India”
There is also a massive correlation to once an India CEO gets hired, H-1B visa applications skyrocket
This needs to stop