These people are the villains out of Atlas Shrugged. Rand was a prophet because she understood that philosophy moves the world.
The tax will NOT soften any blow. It does the opposite. It delays and raises the cost of everything AI is already solving: cancer and Alzheimer's research, safer surgery, faster diagnosis, software that makes developers and businesses more productive, tools that help writers think. Tax the data centers and you slow all of it.
But she sees none of that. She sees only money to loot for her "causes." The producer is the threat to be managed, the disruption a pretext, the seizure a virtue.
They never create. They only wait for someone else to build something worth taking, then arrive with a tax and a speech about who they're cushioning. A despicable bunch indeed.
Listen up AI nerds: here’s the deal.
We need you to give 50% of your companies to the government and then pay a 50% unrealized capital gains tax on the rest. And then a 37% Federal Tax and a 13.3% California tax. And tip 30%.
And don’t let any of this affect your growth rates or shut your companies down.
We’ll need more money next year.
We’re spending $80B repaving the parking lots of every Learing Center in the country.
Greater good.
Some of the greatest philosophers and economists for liberty have Jewish ancestry.
Javier Milei
Ludwig von Mises
Murray Rothbard
Ayn Rand
Milton Friedman
Robert Nozick
Israel Kirzner
David D. Friedman
Jack Lloyd
Walter Block
Henry Hazlitt
Michael Malice
It's incredible to see!
I’m a fan of Popper too. I think he produced much better work on epistemology than Oism, at least from what I’ve read. (I’ve read lots of Popper and a fair amount of Oism.)
My main criticism of him is that he had a soft spot for socialism and thought too highly of democracy and of Kant.
I agree there’s large overlap between Popper and Oism. For example, both are fallibilists (at least pre-Peikoff).
I agree with your observation that Popper’s criticis don’t understand him. Which is weird because he always writes simply and clearly.
@EP_Freely No that doesn’t like popper. He says we create *new* knowledge. It does come from within, but it’s new regardless. It’s just not the discovery of knowledge that was hidden away. And the bit about a past life is obviously mystical
As an engineer, there’s some disappointment in getting something right on the first try.
It may sound counterintuitive, but when things go wrong, there’s room for growth. I can debug errors and *learn*.
But if I get it right on the first try, then I’m already… done.
60 years ago today, Surveyor I made a three-point soft landing on the Moon—the first soft landing for America's space program—AND accomplished on its first try. Over the next 6 weeks it returned more than 11,000 images of the lunar surface including this one featuring its shadow.
The mission was one of the great successes of NASA's early lunar program.
@brave Buggy as hell btw. When I minimize brave YouTube stops playing and I have to hit play in the control center within seconds or it loses the track completely
@JPKivisto@Sam_kuyp We don’t grow knowledge by finding secure foundations and deriving conclusions from them. We grow knowledge by guessing solutions to problems and correcting errors in those guesses
@jasonfried@MindMyF1tness@DKThomp At 100 yeah probably. I’ve seen some remarkable strong and youthful 80 year olds though. They all lifted weights. I expect them to do much better than the average 100-year-old