harmonyactivist

Free human being, pro personal choice looking for health, balance and harmony. Truth seeker, question everything! Pro natural medicine.

[Dr Clare Craig @ClareCraigPath]

The petition to stop folic acid entering our flour is on 7,337 votes after three days.

Please keep sharing with friends and family.

If we kept up the current rate we could reach the target by the end of July.

https://t.co/XzpiIGIzT7

[UK Medical Freedom @ukmfa1]

NEW PETITION - End the mandatory fortification of white flour with folic acid immediately

"We call on the Government to stop the fortification of flour with synthetic folic acid. Folic acid is a medicine not a food. We believe it is unethical to mass medicate the entire population without their knowledge or consent in the hope that a minority group of people might see a benefit...."

‼️CALL TO ACTION - Please SIGN and SHARE widely ‼️

Let's get this to 100,000 signatures and force a debate in Parliament.

https://t.co/TCkBX0Xsjh

[Ramin Ekhtiar @raminrealtalk]

My BMW tried to pull itself over at 70 mph on the freeway… because I glanced at the side mirror.

The government mandated a kill switch in every new car starting 2026.

Your dashboard is now judge, jury, and executioner. It watches your eyes, hands, and posture — then shuts you down.

Biden signed it in the 2021 Infrastructure Bill.

Massie warned us on the House floor.
Your car no longer belongs to you.
This is insane.

RT if you’re not okay with this.

@RepThomasMassie @elonmusk
#KillSwitch #SurveillanceState #BigBrother

[Jacqui Deevoy @JacquiDeevoy1]

I wonder what antibiotics they've been doling out in Kent 🤔 as a preventative treatment for meningitis.

Hope it wasn't this one...

Ciprofloxacin (a fluoroquinolone antibiotic) can cause serious, disabling, and potentially irreversible peripheral neuropathy and central nervous system (CNS) effects that may mimic neurological symptoms, including those seen in meningitis, such as intense headaches, confusion and ataxia. While fluoroquinolones are generally considered for treating some infections, they can induce a "meningism" state - a drug-induced aseptic meningitis - characterised by headache, stiff neck and nausea. 

Key details regarding ciprofloxacin-induced nerve damage and CNS symptoms include:

Symptoms Resembling Meningitis/Neurological Damage: Symptoms often include severe headaches, confusion, delirium, agitation, visual hallucinations, dizziness and ataxia.

Peripheral Neuropathy: This can manifest as tingling, numbness, burning, pain or weakness in the arms and legs. These symptoms can occur shortly after beginning treatment and may be permanent.

Time to Onset: Neuropathic symptoms can start within 24 hours to one week of treatment initiation, and in some cases, the damage may be long-lasting or irreversible.

Mechanism of Toxicity: The nerve damage is often categorised as a "dying-back" sensory axonopathy. Severe cases have been linked to an acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN), similar to Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Risk Factors: Elderly patients, those with chronic renal disease, diabetes, or those taking other neurotoxic-associated drugs are at higher risk. 

Warnings: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other health authorities warn that fluoroquinolones should be avoided for minor infections because of the risk of permanent disabling side effects, including peripheral neuropathy"

Of COURSE they wouldn’t use a drug that has side effects that mimic meningitis. They wouldn’t do that.

But guess what… THAT’S THE DRUG BEING USED!

Oops!

https://t.co/eoZn5hZp53

[William Stickevers @wstickevers]

https://t.co/pm2JdBINdo

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Great early work by @ClareCraigPath exposing this.Please consider that 50% of the UK population are now expected to experience cancer during their life, which will be made worse by a mandated artificial additive in all flour. This must be stopped.
❤️ your video Melissa.

[David Sunfellow @sunfellow]

I've been having an intense, information-packed conversation with GROK about vaccines, beginning with the polio vaccine. As the conversation evolved, I asked GROK to create comprehensive arguments that represented both sides of the childhood vaccine debate. On the one side of the debate is a holistic-minded parent, on the other side is a parent that trusts Western medicine. Here are four excerpts from the holistic parent side of the debate. To read the full conversation, including the GROK-generated arguments put forward by both sides of the debate, go here:

https://t.co/CerNdcariq

Vaccine Risks Are Massive and Hidden:

The Cutter Incident killed 10 and paralyzed 200 [Offit, 2005], SV40 exposed 98 million to cancer risks (10,000-30,000 cases [Bookchin, 2004]), and OPV caused 152 VAPP cases [Alexander, 2004]. VAERS’s ~6,500 polio reports (1990-2025) adjust to 650,000 claimed injuries with the 1% reporting rate [Lazarus, 2010] -- far beyond the CDC’s ~6,000. Dr. Paul Thomas’s study (2020) found vaccinated kids with 3-5x more office visits and higher asthma (OR 4.49) [Lyons-Weiler & Thomas]. Tens of thousands of parents have reported vaccine-related deaths and injuries to their children to official U.S. government systems like VAERS, V-SAFE, and VICP -- estimated at 5,000-10,000 deaths and 450,000-1,000,000 injuries via VAERS, and 1,410 deaths and 25,379 injuries via VICP petitions. However, the deaths and injuries of potentially vast numbers of children -- ranging from tens of thousands to millions when adjusted for underreporting (e.g., 2.6M-3M deaths and 201M-205M injuries based on VAERS’s 1% reporting rate) -- have likely gone unreported due to distrust in government health agencies, lack of awareness of reporting and compensation systems like VAERS and VICP, and barriers such as complexity or perceived futility in seeking redress. The CDC suppressed ESP:VAERS (2.6% reactions), hid V-SAFE’s 7.7% medical care rate until ICAN sued [Reuters, 2022], and the FDA tried to bury Pfizer data for 75 years until forced by PHMPT [Reuters, 2022] -- vaccines harm, and they cover it up.

Corruption Rigged the Game -- and Support Is Nonexistent:

Ex-CDC directors like Gerberding earned $2.4M-$3.15M from pharma [Research!America], with $10B in vaccine revenue at stake [Fortune Business Insights, 2023]. The CDC killed ESP:VAERS (2010), hid V-SAFE (ICAN lawsuits), won’t compare vaccinated vs. unvaccinated kids (FOIA, 2020), and retracted Thomas’s study [2021]. The FDA’s 75-year Pfizer delay (sued by PHMPT) and VICP’s $4.8B payout to only 9,479 of 26,789 claims show decades of suppression -- 650,000 adjusted polio claims dwarf their ~6,000, proving a cover-up. Another reason holistic-minded parents may choose not to vaccinate their children is the lack of government support systems, such as forums or meetings, for vaccine-injured children and their families -- beyond the limited financial compensation offered by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Private support has also proven challenging to access, as evidenced during the COVID-19 pandemic when individuals and parents seeking help for vaccine injuries formed social media groups, some with tens of thousands of members (e.g., ~200,000 across multiple groups), only to see many deleted by platforms like Facebook in 2021. These deletions, often justified as combating ‘misinformation,’ occurred under pressure from U.S. government agencies, including the CDC and White House, and were influenced by Big Pharma’s interests, effectively silencing and de-platforming those questioning vaccine safety and effectiveness. My kids deserve freedom from this fraud -- and real support if harmed, not silence.

Experts Abandon Vaccines, None Return:

A chilling trend reveals the truth: countless doctors, researchers, and authors start as pro-vaccine believers -- trained in mainstream medicine -- but shift to anti-vaccine advocacy after witnessing injuries or uncovering fraud, while virtually none move the other way. Examples include Dr. Peter McCullough (cardiologist, shifted post-COVID-19 myocarditis), Dr. Robert Malone (mRNA pioneer, turned 2021), Dr. Pierre Kory (pulmonologist, 2021 ivermectin advocate), Dr. Ryan Cole (pathologist, 2021 autopsy findings), Dr. Joseph Mercola (osteopath, 1990s shift), Dr. Andrew Wakefield (gastroenterologist, 1998 MMR), Dr. Suzanne Humphries (MD, 2011 kidney injuries), Dr. Toni Bark (pediatrician, 2010s), Dr. Sherri Tenpenny (osteopath, 2000s), Dr. Lawrence Palevsky (pediatrician, 2000s), Dr. Judy Mikovits (researcher, 2010s), Dr. Russell Blaylock (neurosurgeon, 1990s), Dr. Stephanie Seneff (MIT, 2010s), Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld (immunologist, 2000s), and Dr. Theresa Deisher (biologist, 2010s). Of 1M U.S. physicians, 0.1%-1% (1,000-10,000) shift from pro- to anti-vaccine, driven by patient harm, personal experience, or suppressed data (e.g., 650,000 polio claims), yet no prominent anti-vaccine MDs become pro-vaccine advocates -- 0% (<0.001%). This one-way exodus, with no reversals, screams that something’s wrong -- credible experts see the harm (e.g., 2.6M-3M unreported deaths) and can’t unsee it, while science clings to silence.

Public Trust Collapses, Proving Something’s Wrong:

Current trends scream that something has gone terribly wrong with vaccines and the system pushing them: anti-vaccine books dominate sales -- 16 of the top 20 bestsellers (e.g., Dissolving Illusions, Kennedy’s The Real Anthony Fauci) challenge safety and efficacy, outselling pro-vaccine works like Offit’s by a wide margin, showing parents crave the truth. Online, anti-vaccine discussions have exploded over five years (2020-2025), especially post-COVID-19, with X amplifying defectors (e.g., Malone, McCullough) and parents citing 5K-10K VAERS deaths and 650,000 polio claims -- silenced groups (200K members, 2021) fuel this fire. Generally, 0.1%-1% of MDs (1K-10K) turn anti-vaccine, none reverse, and public trust crumbles -- 2.6M-3M unreported deaths and 201M-205M injuries reflect a system hiding harm. This isn’t transitory or insignificant; it’s a fundamental collapse -- vaccines maim, and the corrupt system (e.g., Gerberding’s $2.4M, $10B profits) lies, leaving us unsupported and unheard.

Read the full, information-packed conversation here:
https://t.co/CerNdcariq

Scroll to the end to read the current arguments put forward by both sides of the vaccine debate:
https://t.co/CerNdcariq

................

Other vaccine-related conversations with GROK:

How Big Pharma and Bill Gates Have Corrupted The Health Care System
https://t.co/hmT98omQ9O

Parents As Primary Source Of Independent Feedback
https://t.co/aKWkQwMNP1

Best-Selling Anti-Vaccine Books & Trends
https://t.co/8DCW5WhmTe

Grok Summarizes The Four Groundbreaking Anti-Vaccine Books
https://t.co/MxfDm20QSN

@RobertKennedyJr
@RWMaloneMD
@P_McCulloughMD
@stkirsch
@NVICLoeDown
@NicoleShanahan
@delbigtree
@AaronSiriSG
@ChildrensHD

[Toby Rogers @uTobian]

I never get tired of this chart. It puts to rest all of the public health fear-mongering. From "Healing without Hurting: Treating ADHD, Apraxia and Autism Spectrum Disorders Naturally and Effectively without Harmful Medications" by Jennifer Giustra-Kozek.

[Dr Aseem Malhotra @DrAseemMalhotra]

I predicted the mRNA ‘vaccines’ would accelerate coronary disease in 2021 and this would &gt; excess deaths for years.Its likely why my father had a sudden cardiac death 6 months later. I then diagnosed it in my patients. More evidence that this was correct. WTAF have we done ?! 😡

[Dr Henry Ealy @DrHenryEaly]

UK govt knows that NOPA, a metabolite of 3NOP, does show up in the milk.

And 3NOP does shrink ovaries.

https://t.co/Ear9GDRK3b

[Frontline Films® @FrontlineFilmsU]

TONIGHT: Join @DrSimoneGold, producer of our latest film “What Is a Doctor?”, along with @RWMaloneMD, @GenFlynn, @drscottjensen, @frankgaffney, @Miriam_Grossman &amp; more

At 8pm EST, we expose “gender affirming care” for what it really is—medical mutilation

https://t.co/gpJQ9VpZ8Y

[SAFO NYAME HERBAL THERAPEUTICS @safonyameherbal]

Dear cancer patients,

Dandelion has been demonstrated to destroy about 98% of cancer cells due to the presence of bioactive compound called taraxasterol.

How to prepare
Boil the fresh root of dandelion for 10mins and drink 60mls 3 times daily🍀

Every home needs dandelion❤️

[harmonyactivist @decenthuman14]

https://t.co/VQHcbmeLGI

[“Sudden And Unexpected” @toobaffled]

A group of Japan’s leading scientists has uncovered evidence proving that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are causing a global surge in heart failure and related deaths.
The Japanese scientists used a specialized biopsy technique to finally prove that Covid mRNA shots cause fatal damage to the heart in those who receive the injections.

https://t.co/eu0Hy6aC5v

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

Look up and see what’s happening in the sky over the UK.

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

Media Blackout: 10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You This Week

#10 - RFK Jr. vows to put an STOP chemtrails “crimes” as part of Trump administration.

Chemtrails have been repeatedly attacked as a crazy “conspiracy theory,” but anyone who has been paying attention knows that our skies have not looked the same for years.

Beautiful blue skies that we enjoyed so much in our childhood have often become hazy, littered with these long white stripes that seem to stay put, then evolve into a monstrous cloud cover that blankets the sky.

This phenomenon has a name. It has many, actually, but the most common tagline given to it is chemtrails, which is short for chemical trails.

Geoengineering expert Dane Wigington has been fighting to expose the “poisoning of our skies” for decades.

He insists, “What we’re seeing in our skies are not condensation trails… they are sprayed particulate trails.”

Watch our exclusive interview to learn the disturbing truth.

See more revealing stories in the thread below 🧵

[Died Suddenly @DiedSuddenly_]

𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐓𝐎𝐁𝐀𝐂𝐂𝐎 𝐍𝐈𝐂𝐎𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐄 𝐃𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐘𝐒 𝐍𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐁𝐎𝐓𝐒 𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐒

A new study by microscopists with La Quinta Columna has shown that the “self assembling entities” found inside Pfizer, Moderna, and most recently, dental anesthetic, are “totally destroyed” by a nicotine mixture, derived from stepping tobacco in distilled water.

Researcher Rafa Calvin made this discovery by isolating a sample of dental anesthetic for 30 days, then applying a nicotine mixture taken from a solution of 1 gram of Tabacco and 5ccs of distilled water.

In the video below, you can see that when the nicotine mixture interacts with the nanotechnology, the structures disintegrate and disappear completely.

La Quinta Columna is now testing this nicotine solution on a Pfizer shot sample, and if successful, may have the beginnings of a treatment protocol for detoxing humans of this alien technology.

This would include use of nicotine without additives, straight from tobacco, not cigarettes you buy in the store.

Nicotine has already been identified by Dr. Bryan Ardis and others to uniquely combat covid infection, by safeguarding receptors, a phenomenon even recognized by establishment scientists.

Could nicotine hold the key to defeating invasive nanotechnology?

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the world’s leading vaccinologist, and his disciples, have just capitulated. After decades of claiming vaccine safety is robustly studied, they just admitted it is not, neither before nor after licensure. But don’t be fooled – read my stack or this long tweet for details!

Plotkin Article: https://t.co/e5TouI5T17

It is amazing that after decades of Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his vaccinologist disciples insisting vaccines are the most well studied products on the planet, they just penned an article admitting precisely the opposite.

They just admitted vaccines are not properly studied—neither pre-licensure nor post-licensure. They admitted, for example, “prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes [and] follow-up durations” and that “there are not resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies.”

That is an incredible reversal. But let me provide context so nobody is fooled at what they are clearly up to:

For decades, the medical community insisted vaccines are the most thoroughly studied product ever; for example, Dr. Paul Offit said, "I think we should be proud of vaccines as arguably the safest, best tested things we put in our body.”

For decades, parents of vaccine injured children, vaccine injured adults, and other stakeholders contested these claims only to be shunned and attacked by the medical community and health agencies.

In 2018, I had the unprecedented opportunity to depose the architect of our vaccination program and the Godfather of Vaccinology, Dr. Plotkin, and lay bare the evidence that showed what these authors are now finally admitting about the utter lack of vaccine safety trials and studies. See https://t.co/uRg1F8UgBO.

After this deposition is made public, Dr. Plotkin goes on a tirade, making demands that FDA add “missing information on safety and efficacy” in vaccine package inserts and that CDC exclude harms from its Vaccine Information Sheets, “lobbying the Gates Foundation to support pro-vaccine organizations,” working to have WHO list vaccine hesitancy as a global threat, lobbying AAP, IDSA and PIDS to “support training of witnesses” to support vaccine safety, etc. See https://t.co/i8fN2xG1f0.

The problem is, it doesn't work. It doesn’t work because, at bottom, there are no proper safety studies. So, there is no safety data to add to the FDA package inserts, and hiding harms by removing them from CDC inserts doesn’t make them go away. Parents and other adults don’t simply stop believing what they have seen with their own eyes because CDC, WHO, the Gates Foundations, etc., won’t acknowledge them, or worse, they attack them.

That brings us to the present in which Plotkin and his disciples realize they can’t cast voodoo on the public. They can’t hide the truth. So, their only option is to try and co-op the truth they have lied about for decades by now admitting that the studies to show vaccines are safe do not exist. But in making that admission, they conveniently fail to admit that for decades they lied, gaslit, defrauded (and I don’t use that word lightly) the public by claiming that vaccines are probably the most thoroughly safety tested products on the planet and that people should rest assured, no stone on vaccine safety was left unturned.

Thus, in their article just published, they pretend they never lied about vaccine safety. They pretend they are now just pointing out vaccine safety has never really been conducted, as if that was not known to them before.

Don’t be fooled. Their real agenda is plain, and it is not to study vaccine safety, but rather to confirm that which they already believe. This is crystal clear from the fact that, while their article admits the studies have not been done, they write in the same breath that serious vaccine harms are “rare.” But if the studies have not been done, how do they know that? The answer is, they don’t, and they don’t care to know the truth. Their goal is to protect the products they have spent their careers defending and worshipping and that have brought them fame and riches.

They also ignore the mountain of studies and data which already exist that clearly show serious vaccine harms. Just take a moment to review the large body of science around one of the adjuvants used in vaccines which multiple studies show can cause serious harm. See https://t.co/WnadZ1VEM5.

Finally, just look at their proposed solution. After making the a priori conclusion that harms are “rare,” ignoring all the existing studies showing harm, these folk have the audacity to want to raid the federal vaccine injury compensation fund to presumably pay themselves and their compatriots hundreds of millions of dollars to conduct the studies that would, no doubt, seek to confirm their prior conclusion that vaccine harms are “rare,” while ignoring the studies that already show serious harm.

So, with that in mind, and sorry for the long wind-up, here are the things they admit in this article for maybe the very first time:

“[T]he widespread vaccine hesitancy observed during the Covid-19 pandemic suggests that the public is no longer satisfied with the traditional safety goal of simply detecting and quantifying the associated risks after a vaccine has been authorized for use.”

Comment: The parents of vaccine injured children, vaccine injured adults, and others were never “satisfied” with seeking to assess “risks after a vaccine has been authorized.”

“Postauthorization studies are needed to fully characterize the safety profile of a new vaccine, since prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes, follow up durations, and population heterogeneity.”

Comment: Let me translate: the clinical trials relied upon to license childhood vaccines are useless with regard to safety since they virtually never have a placebo control, typically review safety for days or weeks after injection, and often have far too few participants to measure anything of value, just see https://t.co/oS3X20Nb8f; amazingly, I just had a dispute with a Plotkin disciple not long ago in which they were clearly still not ready to admit the above truth https://t.co/ctP6dz8Lli.

“It is critical to examine adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) that have not been detected in clinical trials, to ascertain whether they are causally or coincidentally related to vaccination.”

Comment: No shit and you have been claiming for decades this was being done!

“When they are caused by vaccines (vaccine adverse reactions), the risk attributable to vaccination and the biologic mechanism must be ascertained. That science becomes the basis for developing safer vaccines, if possible, and for determining contraindications to vaccination and the compensation that should be offered for AEFIs.”

Comment: Again, no shit, and you have also been claiming for decades this was being done!

“Currently in the United States, when the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends a new routine vaccine, the only automatic statutory resource allocations that follow are for vaccine procurement by Vaccines for Children (VFC) and for the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Although the ACIP acknowledges the need, there are currently no resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies beyond annual appropriations, which must be approved by Congress each year.”

Comment: Again, no shit! But nice of you to finally admit it after decades of gaslighting.

“Progress in vaccine-safety science has understandably been slow — often depending on epidemiologic evidence that is delayed or is inadequate to support causal conclusions and on an understanding of biologic mechanisms that is incomplete — which has adversely affected vaccine acceptance.”

Comment: More gaslighting because had a proper clinical trial been conducted pre-licensure, we would know the safety before it is unleashed on babies and we wouldn’t need to rely on confounded-biased-conflicted-post-authorization “epidemiological” studies you now want to conduct which you make clear you only suggest because you want to avoid “public concern and consequent decreases in immunization coverage,” not because you actually care about safety.

“In 234 reviews of various vaccines and health outcomes conducted from 1991 to 2012, the IOM found inadequate evidence to prove or disprove causation in 179 (76%) of the relationships it explored, illustrating the need for more rigorous science.”

Comment: Again, no shit, and I would appreciate if you would please properly cite to the ICAN white paper from 2017 from which you have plainly lifted this point https://t.co/uClMBGRJhb.

“Identifying the biologic mechanisms of adverse reactions — how and in whom they occur — is critical for developing safer vaccines, preventing adverse reactions by expanding contraindications, and equitably compensating vaccinees for true adverse reactions.”

Comment: Shameless to pretend you have not for decades ignored or attacked those calling for these studies while pretending a mountain of such studies showing the foregoing don’t already exist.

“[T]he budget for vaccine-safety monitoring at the CDC (which is responsible for the majority of U.S. federal efforts) has remained stagnant … at about $20 million per year” which they write is an “inadequate level of funding.”

Comment: Again, shameless to pretend parent groups have not been yelling about this issue for decades only to be ignored and attacked.

“The public [now] also wants public health authorities to mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse events – which no longer seem rare when vaccines are given to millions or billions of people.”

Comment: They have always been given to millions or billions of people, and the studies showing the harms they cause are not rare and they already exist, but you don’t really care about that reality as vaccine safety is not really the goal.

If they are really interested in the truth about what injuries vaccines cause and the rate at which these injuries occur, then they should welcome convening a bipartisan panel which could first review all the very concerning studies and hard data that already exists on this topic (often by scientists not on pharma’s dole) and we could design additional studies together and have them run in the open so everybody has to live with the result.

(Among other reasons to demand the study be conducted in the open is that I have witnessed firsthand what happens when a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children in large multi-million person datasets, using historical insurance data, showed vaccinated children had multiple times the rate of numerous chronic diseases – the study gets buried hence the need to do it in the open.)

Plotkin and company should welcome studies which can show vaccines have not contributed to the rise in chronic childhood disease (many of which are immune mediated diseases) from 12% of children in the early 1980s (when CDC recommended 7 routine childhood injections) to over 50% of children now (when CDC recommends over 90 routine childhood injections).

And I think they do welcome such studies if they can assure that the outcome would show vaccines do not cause these harms. Alas, the reality is that (as they know) studies showing vaccines contribute to this rise already exist. But their goal, in any event, is not to really study safety. Rather it is to prove their prior assumption that vaccines are safe and harms are “rare.” This approach is how they designed VAERS, V-SAFE, VSD, and every other “safety” system.

As is transparent from their article, the only reason they even pretend to care about vaccine safety is that they want to avoid reduction in vaccine uptake – not actually assure safety.

That all said, if they are really well-meaning, I would welcome collaborating. To be fair, I will email all four of them to request a meeting to review existing science and design studies mutually agreed upon. If they are really interested in vaccine safety, they should welcome that (I have no hard feelings despite their attacks on me and I hope they can rise above any hard feelings they have for the sake of protecting children). Most importantly, I'm willing to live with the results of those studies. Are they?

[Pierre Kory, MD MPA @PierreKory]

The Shocking Truth About Skin Cancer: What You’re Not Being Told About the Sun

Is everything we’ve been told one big fat lie? The answer seems to be a resounding yes.

While the public is constantly told to avoid the sun to prevent skin cancer, what they’re not telling you is that sunlight is arguably the most important nutrient for the human body.

And get this: avoiding sunlight can double one’s risk of dying prematurely, and it also increases the risk of all other cancers.

Sunlight also:

• is critical for mental health
• reduces the risk of breast cancer
• is vital for cardiovascular health
• increases one’s longevity
• is key for human and animal fertility
• triggers the production of Vitamin D
• is vital for proper immune system function

So, why all the fearmongering? The answer seems to be “follow the money.”

A Midwestern Doctor writes:

“A remarkably sophisticated public relations campaign was launched to transform society for the benefit of [the dermatology] industry.”

The demonization of the sun has “allowed the dermatologists to cast themselves as heroes and to stir up as much anxiety as possible about the sun—especially as a psychological investment they had to make constantly putting sunscreen on would make them more likely to go to their dermatologist.”

Moreover, the skin cancer fear campaign has created “a massive sales funnel by being allowed to do a massive number of routine full body skin exams (on otherwise healthy individuals) and hence have a huge pool of potential cancers to biopsy or excise (remove).”

Lastly, the war against sunlight has allowed them “to piggyback onto the fear the medical industry has marketed around cancer to justify charging a lot of money to do something questionable to prevent cancer and having every patient go along with it the second they hear the dreaded ‘c’ word.”

So, there you have it. Now, you understand why they want you to fear the sun and use toxic sunscreen.

Read the entirety of this masterful article by
@MidwesternDoc
in the comment below.