@Lillyin_London Why do we have to render care for botched executions, but not for botched abortions. They should have bagged her up and discarded her in the trash
in June- July 1963 Lee Oswald was involved in a CIA rifle smuggling operation involving a Delta Line cargo /cruise ship that brought over 500 rifles to New Orleans from the port asociated with Caracas, Venezuela. In 2017/2018 the CIA released evidence of other smuggling ops of rifles from Caracas.
I contend that CIA released these files under the JFK Act because Lee was involved in at leat one incident of smuggling rifles from Caracas. How did I know about this? I was personally involved.
I believe these files were releaed because they were related to JFK and Lee Oswald records.
I first reported the Caracas smuggling operation in which I knew Lee was involved in 1999, long before any such files were known to the public.
But neither I nor 6 Minutes were able to find any supporting files for my testimony on rifle smuggling in the National Archives in 2000, when I was sent to search for them,along with 60 Minutes.' ressearcher Dr. Howard Platzman.
It would be 7 years before the files below were released, unredacted, buried among 1000's of untitled releases. I found these 3, then more later. Lee's address book - see below -mentions the shipment of 'guns' in a code with "Caracas."
Lee was not involved in CIA gun smuggling in Clinton, despite James Files' claims. Lee's true activities in Clinton are fully laid out in my books ME and LEE [2010] and in LEE HARVEY OSwALD AND ME [2022].
THE TRUTH IS THERE. All of it. Lee Oswald was working in anti-Catro activities for the CIA and FBI in New Orleans from April 26 1963 to Sept 26, 1963.
Go through my posts about Lee. Go back for months. I have the receipts. But I am not allowed to speak to Rep Luna's committee. I know too much. =jvb=
This is how 383 pages of Andy McCabe messages looked like when they were finally released.
For my Grand Conspiracy book https://t.co/FHLWlkWPUM, for just one my chapters, on McCabe (who opened investigation of President Trump on Obama's orders) I had to:
--read each individual message
--ocr each and create a spreadsheet
--guess what's redacted, decipher coded language
--put it into a chronology that I have been building for 10 years, and see how each message fits
--compare what McCabe said in his testimony, in his book, in his emails, and in his tv appearances
--see what others like Comey and Strzok and Page were doing at the same time
I cannot wait to finish the book!
Our Plandemic Research In March 2020 Summarized in a One-Minute Recreation With All The Real People That Were Part Of That Historic Declaration Of "This Is A Live Exercise". In reality, we were locked down on the Potomac for 18 days, but it made for great research.
You can’t teach students about what happened on 9/11 without discussing why it happened, and you cannot solve a problem without being able to define it. Imagine trying to teach about the Cold War without discussing Communism. If we don’t learn from our past, we are bound to fall victim to these extremists again.
https://t.co/J3yh8fYIGE
Here is the YouTube Class Action for protecting Fauci et al with selective censorship.
https://t.co/Xqn0mzpvlp
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEORGE WEBB SWEIGERT, YOUTUBE CREATOR 1 through YOUTUBE CREATOR 100, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE LLC; YOUTUBE, LLC; DOES 1–100, including responsible officers, executives, managers, and other persons whose identities and roles will be determined through discovery,
Defendants.
Case No. __________
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiffs George Webb Sweigert and YouTube Creator Plaintiffs 1 through 100 (“Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of a proposed class of similarly situated creators, allege as follows.
I. INTRODUCTION
1. This action concerns one of the largest repositories of independently produced documentary, journalistic, scientific, educational, musical, and historical material in modern history: YouTube.
2. Millions of creators have invested years of labor and substantial financial resources producing material for the YouTube platform.
3. Those creators have supplied Google and YouTube with content, audience engagement, advertising inventory, data, subscriptions, goodwill, and market value.
4. In return, creators reasonably expect that published rules governing their participation will be administered in accordance with the parties’ contractual obligations and applicable law.
5. This action challenges what Plaintiffs allege was a pattern of arbitrary, inconsistent, discriminatory, and/or bad-faith enforcement against particular creators and categories of reporting.
6. Plaintiffs do not ask this Court to determine at the pleading stage whether every proposition expressed in every removed video was correct.
7. Nor does this action depend upon proving that every opinion expressed by Plaintiffs ultimately proves correct.
8. The central question is different:
Did Defendants apply their contractual rules and enforcement procedures lawfully and in good faith, or did they selectively eliminate creators and historically valuable reporting based upon viewpoint or undisclosed criteria while representing that enforcement was governed by published standards?
II. THE AUGUST 20, 2026 TERMINATION
9. Plaintiff George Webb Sweigert is an independent journalist and creator who, over a period of years, used YouTube to publish thousands of videos.
10. Sweigert’s archive included substantial amounts of original, on-location reporting rather than merely commentary concerning material produced by others.
11. On or about August 20, 2026, YouTube terminated and/or disabled Sweigert’s channel and rendered thousands of his videos unavailable through the channel.
12. The affected archive allegedly included thousands of videos constituting on-site reporting, research, interviews, citizen-science projects, educational projects, music, cultural material, and other original works.
13. Among the material rendered unavailable were videos concerning Sweigert’s reporting surrounding January 6, 2021.
14. The archive also contained reporting concerning the attempted assassination of Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania.
15. It contained reporting and investigation concerning the death of Suchir Balaji.
16. It contained reporting concerning the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
17. It contained reporting concerning the origins of SARS-CoV-2, coronavirus research, laboratory research, government pandemic preparedness programs, universities, federal agencies, and military pandemic exercises.
18. Plaintiffs contend that much of this material constituted journalism, documentary reporting, commentary, scientific discussion, investigation, or public-interest reporting.
III. DESTRUCTION OF UNRELATED EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL MATERIAL
19. The consequences extended far beyond politically controversial videos.
20. Termination
XV. INJUNCTIVE AND EQUITABLE RELIEF
I think Swalwell getting his devices seized triggered this. He carried an encrypted Blackberry. The whole covert network Schiff is running comes down if they get one device.