Ива Иванова

When the last tree falls, when the last river dries up, when the last bird dies, only then will people understand that money cannot be eaten.

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

@Z_Lib_official Что за ерунда? Набираю в поиске на сайте название книги, нажимаю -найти и перекидывает не понятно куда. Что за дела?

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Отцы туземуна https://t.co/V23coWRr8s

[vitalik.eth @VitalikButerin]

Looks like the options thing is happening already!

See also: various people thinking through and building different versions of the idea in the thread: https://t.co/gFNEvCbHct

Though I do strongly urge that if any of these get on mainnet quickly, we formally verify it first. I hope @vyperlang and/or https://t.co/OMFlWRqJda folks ( @Fricoben) can help!

(Also, now is a good time to be thinking about robustness-optimized oracles)
https://t.co/j1dxLV4Pn4

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Конец «ультразвуковых денег»: почему Ethereum теряет разработчиков и поддержку китов https://t.co/awTIlnMQN7

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Минфин России не хочет разрешать некастодиальные криптокошельки https://t.co/oOLWaqIE59

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Когда AML-сервисы расходятся в оценках https://t.co/TgecxUlggQ

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Биткоин, о котором Хайек не просил https://t.co/JDxDVj3sRj

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Кто и зачем отслеживает биткоин-транзакции? https://t.co/gYwj6Bl0k4

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Кирки и лопаты Ашенбреннера https://t.co/n4AeJXZKW0

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Шифр без панка https://t.co/w87EghjW2W

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Со дна навайбкодили - https://t.co/BOp0jekQW2

[ZachXBT @zachxbt]

1/ An investigation into the opaque private loans/OTC, unilateral vesting changes, market maker coordination, unknown float, and >95% supply control behind $LAB's recent pump to $6B FDV.

Here's why @LABtrade_ represents everything wrong with the current meta of retail extraction on major centralized exchanges.

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Премудрые киты https://t.co/ja9HURq3QH

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Грибница вместо иерархии https://t.co/Op370m3SiH

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

ИИ-диктатура против новых криптохабов https://t.co/CT4aIVcsWH

[Conor Deegan @conordeegan]

We awarded the Q-Day Prize today to Giancarlo Lelli for breaking a 15-bit elliptic curve key on a publicly accessible quantum computer. They derived a private key from its public key using a variant of Shors across 32,767 candidates on cloud-accessible hardware. This is the largest public demonstration of this attack class to date.

The reason we created this prize a year ago was that there has never been an objective public measurement of where quantum attacks on ECC actually stand. The state of the art has been inferred from whitepapers, conference slides, and whatever could be triangulated from rumour or private disclosures. What we know publicly is now grounded in a reproducible result on real hardware. Whatever comes next has to exceed 15 bits under those same conditions, and anyone can verify it.

The most common response to a result at this scale is that 15 bits is nowhere near 256 bits and therefore <insert_cryptocurrency_you_hold> is fine. That reasoning is wrong (unfortunately not FUD/alarmist just physics). The distance from 15 to 256 bits is not a linear slog. Shors algorithm is polynomial in the number of bits being attacked. The logical qubit requirement grows roughly linearly with key size, and once you have fault-tolerant logical qubits the limiting factor is manufacturing and error-correction overhead rather than any new physics.

Progress is gated by thresholds and not by brute-forcing the search space one bit at a time. The intuition people borrow from classical key search does not apply here and it is the single biggest source of confusion we encounter.

Looking at the research, Googles recent paper put breaking 256 bit keys at under 500,000 physical qubits. The subsequent Caltech and Oratomic paper dropped that down to roughly 10,000 in a neutral-atom architecture.

The remaining gap is increasingly an engineering problem rather than a fundamental physics problem. I am not claiming anyone is about to break Bitcoin next week and the uncertainty on the timeline is genuine but the trajectory is objectively clear.

Around 6.9 million Bitcoin sit in wallets with exposed public keys. Google and Cloudflare have committed to being quantum-secure by 2029. The rational response to an objective measurement like this one is to stop arguing about whether the threat is real and start moving keys

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Что такое теория игр и как ее используют в криптовалютах? https://t.co/EJqmnyTm0X

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Бизнес за закрытыми дверями. Как принимать биткоин и не раскрыть оборот конкурентам https://t.co/GiOyJLvNR5

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

Безопасных мест в DeFi не осталось? Чему учит кейс Aave и Kelp https://t.co/4pYOPS1v5K

[Ива Иванова @decomeron]

@Z_Lib_official Oops! Something went wrong. Please reload the page and try again.