One thing is clear: the Delhi protesters want to plunge India into chaos, and stop the nation's progress. We must defeat this malicious agenda, which is aided and abetted by powers that want to destroy India.
We have a vibrant democracy and elections are the proper way to express our collective judgment.
Raakh is facing backlash for adding caste and religious spin to the infamous Ranga-Billa case.
From Dahaad to Tandav, Prime Video has repeatedly pushed similar ideological narratives in Indian stories.
Creative liberty cannot become a cover for twisting real events and vilifying Hindus.
writes @immortalsoulin
https://t.co/RGbNv8wszw
Trump: If India was attacked, America will be there to help
Trump looks at a laughing Modi: Is that a good statement?
Trump: If anyone attacks Modi we will be there. But if there is another leader in India, then I don't know
Did you know that a #Jain shravak donated โน1 lac each to 7,000 needy Jain families all across India (โน 70 crores). He is considered an epitome personality in Sadharmik Bhakti ~meet โKalyug ka Chamatkarโ ~ Shri Kalpeshbhai V Shah. Read his complete story in the thread
#Jainism
Is section 324 BNS applicable here for this permanent deformation of a society common area with white epoxy paint for personal religious event by a flat owner ?
I see men like them and then wonder what have I done in life? In front of their achievements and their sacrifices, we civilians have achieved nothing .
A white strip painted for barefoot walkers within the boundaries of a housing soceity has "sparked controversy" because one resident says he wasn't consulted.
Here's what the law actually says.
In a housing society, individual consent is not required. If the managing committee passes a decision in the general body with majority approval, and it doesn't violate the model by-laws, it can be implemented. Period.
The Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court reaffirmed this as recently as May 21, 2026 (Appeal No. 24 of 2026): the general body is the supreme authority.
The aggrieved resident had one job: to tell us whether this was discussed in the society meeting, whether the majority consented or dissented, and if he was in the minority, why he believed the decision violated the rules.
He didn't. Instead, he went viral, which he is entitled to, but...
If he genuinely believes the decision was unlawful, the correct route is a complaint to the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies so that it doesn't remain just a social media post and his campaign appears genuine..
By withholding every legally relevant fact, the complainant didn't raise a housing issue. He ran a clickbait campaign.
Mr. Vedpathak,
What surprises many people is not that you raised a question, but the way you chose to raise it.
Before understanding the purpose behind the practice, you used the term "Jain Jihad" โ a phrase that unfairly associates a peaceful religious tradition with something aggressive and hostile.
Later, in your own video, you acknowledged that Jainism is an achha dharam and deleted your earlier post.
If that is your genuine belief, then surely you can understand why many people found your original choice of words offensive and inappropriate.
The reality is quite simple.
โข The white coating on the pathway was not damaging the society.
โข It was not reducing property values.
โข It was not blocking access to anyone.
โข It was not taking away anyone's rights.
โข The pathway remained open to every resident.
โข In fact, such practices are followed at many temples and religious places across India, particularly where monks and devotees walk barefoot.
โข The purpose is practical โ white-coated surfaces remain cooler during intense summer heat and make barefoot walking more comfortable.
Most importantly, how does this negatively affect your life in any meaningful way?
Has your property value gone down because of it?
Has your quality of life suffered because of it?
The answer appears to be no.
Had you spent a few minutes researching the reason behind the practice, you would likely have found a satisfactory answer. Instead, a simple local matter was presented in a way that invited outrage and communal interpretation.
The monks you indirectly targeted are the same people who spend their lives practicing non-violence, renunciation, self-discipline, and compassion. They walk barefoot not for convenience, but as part of a centuries-old spiritual commitment. Whether one follows Jainism or not, such dedication deserves understanding and respect.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with asking questions. But when a question is framed using inflammatory language, it stops being a search for answers and starts looking like an attempt to provoke a reaction.
Everyone can make mistakes. The mature response is not just to delete a post, but to acknowledge that the term "Jain Jihad" was wrong, clarify the facts, and apologize to the community that was unfairly targeted.
#Jain
@prasadvedpathak