Deharath

[Deharath @deharath]

@nomadmum81 miałem w szkole średniej. nie pamietam nawet czy wiedzieli o jego istnieniu, uzywalem go tylko ja xd

[Deharath @deharath]

@aureliuuusz no fajnie, że tesy mają fajne lore, tylko szkoda, że pomimo tego skyrim writing ma na wskroś chujowy i drewniany.
tes 5 stał i osiągnął sukces wyłącznie gameplayem.
szansa na dobrą grę od tego studia jest tylko i wyłącznie, jeżeli wyciągneli wnioski z starfielda.

[Deharath @deharath]

@gulczynskim @AwDitrich @b_mroz_gorgon tak, tutaj większym problemem, że ta praca jest na poziomie darmowych modeli sprzed półtora roku.

[Deharath @deharath]

@RadekKar mozna prosic tryb ciemny 😭

[Deharath @deharath]

@GejmerAkrobata na tych straganach zawsze było niskiej jakości gowno

[Deharath @deharath]

@loss_gobbler I kinda did similar thing year ago on copilot, but used the fact that I could edit commands it wanted to execute, so I simply told it to do echo done when done and then I edited "done" to keep going without using another premium request

[Deharath @deharath]

@PiotrMaciejczak Wiedźmin 3 2, generalnie reszta interfejsu też wygląda jak kopia

[Deharath @deharath]

@Pirat_Nation I know it's the team that made w3, but goddamn, this game looks too much like Witcher 3 II

[Deharath @deharath]

@M_Jozefaciuk @Gasiuk_Pihowicz oj ale trochę rażą w oczy typowe dla AI manieryzmy

"to nie X, to Y" plus puenta

[Deharath @deharath]

@RadekKar z ciekawości

[Tibo @thsottiaux]

@rxmphai I'll do another performative reset on Monday

[Deharath @deharath]

@Kari445009 pisze się spróchniała 😭

[𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚊𝚕𝚒 @alkalinesec]

wait hold on shit

[jacob @jsnnsa]

@raffx03 opus 4.6 warmed up to these bits for me and found them very funny

[Taelin @VictorTaelin]

this is my personal singularity moment

this post may sound like a paid ad. I only wish. I'm concerned, more so than happy. the world is changing, and, among the scenarios where AI goes terribly wrong, inequality is the most realistic, yet, the one Anthropic seems to be the least concerned about. I'm glad OpenAI is taking the opposite stance: *personal AGI for everyone*. I think this is a commendable position in the times we live. but who am I in the queue of the bread?

anyway, Fable is here, so I'll just report my first-hour experience

first of all, all my pet prompts are solved.
→ λ-calculus puzzles
→ bug questions
→ one-shot apps
all are trivial to it.

I don't have anything harder other than my
ongoing work

so, in the last several days, I've been toying with HVM5, a new interaction net evaluator with a faster loop.

after writing the first version, I left 32 GPT-5 agents working for ~20 hours each. this resulted in up to 2x speedups, but the file size increased by 2-fold and quality decreased significantly.

I then simplified the whole thing into an even simpler core, and left Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 optimizing it for 8 hours. Opus got a legit 6% - 34% speedup in most benches. GPT got better results, but, sadly, an unusable file.

I then asked Fable to optimize it.

2 hours later, it landed a 1770% speedup in one case, 100%+ in other 4, and 22% in average. yes, in 2 hours it outperformed me, opus 4.8 and a swarm of gpt 5.5 agents, by one order of magnitude.

that could not possibly be legit. "it must be hardcoding the benchmarks" (GPT trauma). so I read its explanation and what it did was, indeed, the most high impact optimization one could try first. seems like HVM5 was wasting a lot of time garbage-collecting unused branches of pattern-match nodes. I had optimized that for static mats, but not for dynamic mats. skill issue. Fable figured how to do it for these, resulting in a massive speedup in some benches

but wait, is that *correct*? I'm not sure yet, it is credible, but this is the kind of thing that is very easy to get wrong on interaction nets. the problem is, when I was ready to start auditing Fable's solution so I could tell whether it was buggy or legit, it interrupted me to tell me it had found a massive bug on the code *I* had written.

... wait, what?

so... for garbage collection purposes, I stored a bit on lambda term pointers that meant "the variable bound by this lambda has been freed, so, its lambda must free whatever argument it is applied to". that's fine. yet, on duplicator nodes, I also used the same bit to mean "one of the duplicated variables was freed, so, treat this dup as a passthrough no-op". so, if a lambda entered a duplicator, it would mistake the lambda's collection bit for its own, resulting in corrupted interaction!

that's a mouthful, why I'm writing this?

just so you can appreciate the sheer absurdity of what just happened. I didn't ask it to find bugs. I asked it for an optimization. and even if I did ask it to find bugs, this bug is so astonishingly subtle and specific, identifying it takes mastering the domain to an extent that it beyond even me. I'd easily need hours or days to fix it, *if* I ever came across it. chances are it would just go unnoticed. and Fable found it and fixed it like it was nothing, while it was busy adding a 17x speedup to a file that neither I, nor Opus 4.8, nor a fleet of GPT 5.5 managed to barely make 2x faster.

oh and there is also another tab where it is also ripping through Bend's codebase and finishing everything I had to do

I don't know what to say anymore

this isn't about Anthropic or OpenAI, this is about our collective future as a species. the world is changing, and we need to be aware of it, and discuss how to handle this change.

receipt below . . .

[Deharath @deharath]

@th30wlm4n

[Biuro Prasowe ORLEN @b_prasoweORLEN]

@coolfonpl Mówi się: Russkij wojennyj korabl, idi…

[Deharath @deharath]

@asubparusername hard disagree about it being biggest learning curve out of paradox games, i would argue this title belongs to eu4

[Deharath @deharath]

@ProudBavaria Haven't played on this patch so idk how it works in practice, but it would be cool to have AI attitude separate, but coupled for country and a ruler and have them compound/cancel out. Country one could switch based on age for example.

[Ra @slimepriestess]

everyone talks about AI psychosis, yet no one talks about anti-AI psychosis which seems much worse and much more widespread.