That hatred for Tinubu is partly because he practically took away the favourite talking points of many political analysts.
For years, the daily conversation was the same: Remove subsidy, float the exchange rate, establish state police, and devolve more powers to the local governments.
Then Tinubu suddenly appeared from somewhere and said, “Okay, let’s do them.”
Now, whether you agree with his implementation or not, the talking points have changed completely.
If na you nko, you go like the man?
You worry more about Governors abusing state police during elections that happen once every four years. You do not worry about whether the state of insecurity under centralised policing can be such that elections are not even held in some places in the first place.
You do not worry about school children being kidnapped every day in hundreds or kidnappers collecting ransoms through bank accounts that have BVN for which you must have an NIN, and proudly posting videos on social media.
You worry about how the states would fund state police. You do not worry that the Federal Government consumes 52% of all resources, and wastes it on frivolous spending and on irrelevant and ineffective agencies, while 36 states and 774 LGAs only get 48%.
You are not Ezemmuo. You don’t know things.
A terrific PMQs by @KemiBadenoch
Starmer kept repeating his greatest hits of non-existent winning policies to which Kemi replied ‘if it’s going so well why have you resigned’ (saying what the whole country was thinking) & Reeves almost cried again when Kemi pointedly asked where was she when Starmer resigned not with him outside number 10 but getting ready for a selfie with Burnham!
THE FIVE TESTS
For weeks I've argued that this party, and this country, needs a proper debate about where we go next. Not a reshuffle. Not a few degrees of course correction. The big, difficult, honest choices we've spent thirty years avoiding.
A few people have asked me what that debate should actually be about. Fair enough. I spent 24 years in the Marines and two in government, and I resigned because I couldn't win the argument I believed in from the inside. So let me make it here, plainly.
This isn't a manifesto, but a set of five tests. Anyone asking to lead our country should be able to look down this list and say yes to all five.
1️⃣ The Frontline Test
Do we give the people on the frontline the kit they need to do the job, and stand by them when the job is done?
I joined the Marines at 18. I've buried friends. So I do take this one personally.
I sat in government and watched us write a defence plan for a world that no longer exists, discussed in rooms I was kept out of. A 100k drone is now sinking warships that cost a billion. That is the reality of the wars being fought right now.
Passing this means 3% of GDP as the floor, not the ceiling. Buying for the next war, not the last. And fixing the Legacy Act so blokes in their seventies aren't back in the dock for what they were cleared of decades ago.
2️⃣ The Next-Generation Test
Are we handing the next generation a better deal than the one we inherited, or a worse one?
I'm a lad from a tough part of Aberdeen. My mum raised five of us through some bleak years. The only reason I got out was because I was given an opportunity. That cannot be said for young people today.
Nearly a million young people, around one in eight, are now outside work, education or training. That isn't their failure. It's ours.
Fixing this means a NEETs and youth unemployment target with a date, the youth guarantee delivered not just announced. Restoring the link between work and a decent life for the under 30s, on housing, wages and opportunity. Skills and apprenticeship numbers that beat the last government, not just match it.
Talent is everywhere in this country. Opportunity isn't. Fix that and you fix half of everything else...
3️⃣ The Trillion-Pound Test
Is the plan to add a trillion pounds to what Britain earns, or to manage the decline more politely?
Here's the lesson I learned from Ukraine and in government, and it never changes. We invent things. Other countries build them. Other countries decide. We're brilliant at the first mile and absent for the next ninety nine.
So set a target and be judged on it. A trillion pounds added to our GDP within a decade. Yes, it's ambitious. We should be ambitious!
Getting there means backing the high tech inventors just as much as the high street traders. Your local coffee shop shouldn't be paying more tax per cappuccino than Starbucks does. So why on earth do they?
It means an industrial strategy worth the name. Things to make and things to sell, in Barrow, in Derby, in every region. Our industrial base is national security, so we should fund it like it.
And it means building the chips and the compute here, not inventing the breakthrough and watching someone else scale it. Data is the new gunpowder.
4️⃣ The 10% Test
Can we make the country work 10% better, instead of only ever asking for 10% more?
I saw this from the inside. We patch the symptom this year, but the bill grows next year, and we end up paying for failure at the most expensive end of every system.
A 10% improvement in outcomes across a handful of our biggest problems, ill health, reoffending, wasted potential, would free up somewhere between £40 and £60 billion a year. We're already paying those costs. We just pay them too late, when they're at their worst.
Passing this means investing early instead of paying far more later, and having the honesty to admit that not every pound we spend today delivers an immediate return.
5️⃣ The Lights-On Test
Does our energy policy keep the lights on, the bills down and factories open, or do we keep chasing a target and hope the rest sorts itself out?
For years we've treated net zero as the only goal, and everything else, your bill, our industry, whether the grid even stays up, as a problem for later. That’s the wrong way around.
Make energy security the goal. Power that people, businesses, and industry can afford, and a grid that stays on when someone tries to switch it off. Do that and net zero follows. Chase the target on its own, and you end up with neither.
Passing this means a serious baseload, nuclear and the North Sea, built in time to matter. Strong countries have cheap, secure energy. Weak countries don't.
None of this is complicated. It's the oldest deal there is. You serve the country, the country stands by you. In uniform, in a hospital, in a classroom, on a building site. Right now that deal is broken, and everyone keeping our country going can feel it.
That broken deal is the real reason for the frustration out there. It's why trust has drained out of politics. And it's why our party that won a landslide is, halfway through the term, already arguing about who leads it.
But changing the person at the top fixes nothing if we don't fix the deal underneath. Swap one leader for another and leave the deal broken, and we'll be right back here in eighteen months, asking the same question all over again.
So I'm not interested in who gets what job. I'm interested in whether we've got the courage to pass these tests.
We've been promised a debate. This is my opening offer to it. And if that debate ever becomes a contest, it should be fought on this ground, not on personalities.
I know where I stand.
Just before PMQs, at the despatch box, she called one of my MPs a racist. She’s just said it again on Radio 4.
The hordes of Labour MPs rushing to twitter to whine about me calling her “spiteful” are just exposing their own hypocrisy.
They love to dish it but they can’t take it.
"I grew up on a council estate" is not an excuse for failure. You are sacrificing the future of generations of kids on the altar of your class envy -reversing even Labour's academy reforms.
0% of teachers think you're doing a great job. I'm not here to give you a pat on the back.
I speak for those people whose lives you're destroying and I'll NEVER stop speaking up for them.
“Manchester is not the United Kingdom, and all he did in Manchester was spend money which the Govt had given him”.
We need to cut benefit spending and invest in defence and the economy.
Only Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch is talking about serious policies. Nobody else is.
Starmer made two genuinely big calls in office.
The first was scrapping the Rwanda plan on day one, despite it being paid for, legislated for, and ready to go. He replaced it with the nebulous promise to “smash the gangs”. That decision blew a hole in his entire approach to illegal migration.
The second was his mobilisation of state power during the Southport riots. A muscular response was necessary, but Starmer crossed a red line. In doing so, he exposed the two-tier nature of the British state.
Those were the two defining decisions of his premiership. Both were deliberate choices. And both ultimately helped undo his premiership.
David Lammy will now be taking the G7 Summit statement in Parliament. David Lammy did not attend the G7 Summit.
A Tory Party source tells me "Kemi is the only leader actually turning up to do their job. The PM has clearly given up. All that guff about national interest and priorities has gone out the window in less than two hours. Kemi will be the only one in the Chamber showing any common-sense because there's none coming from the Labour benches."
Does nobody think it’s just the tiniest bit weird that even Labour MPs think there is nobody - not one person - elected in 2024 who would make a competent PM? Not one.
I don’t think I’ve seen a Labour MP with as much aura as Andy Burnham. He was favourite to become PM whilst still a mayor, An MP voluntarily gave up their seat for him, he breezed through the local elections. No other MP is willing to challenge him. He’ll become PM with no contest. Insane.