@DerivativesDon@ftraderft This depends on whether you're doing risk management or playing tactical shorting. For the former, enforcing stop for hedging is the way to live. The retest may have a high probability of happening, but risk management cannot rely on that.
@mranti 不过有些功能还是会出错(websearch, deepresearch),不知道是不是因为我 subanget 也用 pro: API Error: 400 thinking options type cannot be disabled when reasoning_effort is set
I Went From $3,000/Month on Claude to $5/Week on DeepSeek
And honestly? 80% of my work is identical.
For the past two months, I was burning $3-5K monthly on Claude Code. Every idea from design to development to testing - full end-to-end automation, even simulating users to test my products and provide feedback.
Extremely token-intensive. But Claude's caching sucked, making it insanely expensive.
Then I discovered DeepSeek V4.
The numbers:
• Claude: $5 input, $25 output per million tokens
• DeepSeek: $0.28 input, <$1 output (with their current discount)
• DeepSeek cached: $0.0002 - literally less than a penny
The caching optimization is game-changing. Once DeepSeek has seen content, it basically stops charging tokens.
My result: $5/week vs $1,000/week for the same workload.
What works exactly the same:
• UX modifications
• Product development
• Competitor research
• Content writing
• Code reviews
Where Claude still wins:
• Complex architectural decisions
• Extremely nuanced problems
But here's the thing - Claude has been getting dumber recently. It often says "done!" when it's clearly not done. Then apologizes but still doesn't finish the work.
My current stack:
• DeepSeek V4 Flash/Pro for 80% of daily work
• Codex 5.5 for the hardest problems (more reliable execution)
• Claude Code occasionally (because I already paid for it 🤷♂️)
DeepSeek is also 3x faster than Claude. For tasks like "compare these repos" or "read this long document," DeepSeek finishes instantly while Claude takes 3+ minutes.
Fun fact: I heard DeepSeek's speed comes from both optimization and gradually switching to Chinese chips (Huawei). If that's true, we might see even better performance later this year.
Everyone's betting on Anthropic's rising valuation in secondary markets. But when 80% of daily dev work can be done faster, better, and cheaper by open-source models...
Is Anthropic guaranteed to be the final winner? I think it's too early to call.