@burnermitch22@UnrigLA@yashar Ideally that would be the case, but the fact that the NBC site and the actual election data are not always in sync makes me feel like this is someone’s web design error or they are actually doing it manually. Not sure which is worse, it’s not a good look for NBC.
So many people are screaming that Pratt got zero votes in a ballot drop when in reality he actually got 21,870 in that drop.
They are just reposting the same inaccurate info from NBC News site (left). Receipts from official county registrar’s site on right.
@MikeAnd14047668@UnrigLA Exposed their own fraud by showing definitively that Pratt got votes in the dump where he supposedly didn’t…go be a bot somewhere else
@UnrigLA@MikeAnd14047668 Like the options are: democrats rigged the NBC website but not the official vote count OR someone at NBC skipped a couple of lectures in their programming class.
@UnrigLA@MikeAnd14047668 They would rather believe NBC is counting the votes themselves than understanding that they probably just update their site on some time period and input each ballot drop manually by candidate.
@burnermitch22@UnrigLA@yashar More plausible that NBC techs are bad at programming than the election data source they’re using is being intentionally mismatched. What do you think is more accurate, NBC or the place they get their data?
@SteveHiltonx India gets six weeks to collect the ballots and voting days are staggered across the country. In CA, a mail-in ballot can’t even be counted until all in-person voting is done because they have to make sure people aren’t voting in-person and then mailing in.
California called the race for Kamala as SOON AS THE POLLS CLOSED in 2024.
But when their selected nominee doesn’t win, they’ll count scam votes for a month until they can rig the result.
Then they’ll sue you to prevent you from double-checking their work.
Pull all federal funding from California.
@LorriganMichael@NKY_Leftist@EndWokeness Australia also has elections on Saturdays, the CA primary was on a Tuesday. You can’t count the votes by 6pm without making it difficult for working people to vote. CA laws are intended to make it easy to vote, not easy to count, as it should be.
@PeterSchmidhub2@mattvanswol@Hugowich Also, all of those links are just to homepages. Next time, respond to me as a human and don’t pass your work off to a chatbot, and maybe I’ll consider you worthy of intelligent conversation
@PeterSchmidhub2@mattvanswol@Hugowich Also, just so your LLM knows, I didn’t say “vote counting takes weeks in India” like you clearly prompted it to believe. I said elections take weeks.
@PeterSchmidhub2@mattvanswol@Hugowich The constitution doesn’t say how long it should take to count votes. It does, however, allow people to mail in ballots, and it leaves most voting procedures up to the States.
@PeterSchmidhub2@mattvanswol@Hugowich Thanks LLM. My point stands. India’s elections are staggered, which means they have more time to collect votes from each individual polling station before the final tally. Do you really think it’s the scanning ballots part that makes CA votes take long?
@TalkAboutItLS@BobMann2001@TheDemocrats The SAVE Act doesn’t eliminate mail-in voting. And if you really want to get rid of mail-in ballots, how are our troops fighting in Trump’s foreign wars going to vote?
@lessbureaucrats@Will__Emerson@DaphneKG1004@bennyjohnson They are registered at that address, the toilet is there because their lodgings were torn down. You’d be shocked how many people only register to vote in presidential election years.
@PeterSchmidhub2@mattvanswol@Hugowich Also I’d love to see you respond to the fact that your retweeted source is false and not researched with any integrity.