CHAOS erupted outside of the Liberal Party Caucus Retreat, where protesters with F*** Trudeau flags were arrested and beaten by Trudeau's guards. The one girl who was ragdolled at the end was reportedly just picking up her cell phone.
So about that conspiracy theory that there is a push to have people eat crickets....
It's not a conspiracy theory at all.
Federal documents show the @JustinTrudeau has handed out millions to put crickets on the menu!
Read & RT
https://t.co/0v2CLHXqyh
Today Health Canada approved a Moderna fall booster for COVID-19 for all Canadians over the age of 6 months.
The European Society of Cardiology published a peer-reviewed study in March 2023 indicating myocardial damage in 1 in 35 recipients of a Moderna booster.
Find it here:
https://t.co/WVm3Z0GS9m
#StoptheShots
I’ve mentioned this before, but it bears repeating: the notion that Justin Trudeau is a global media darling is, quite frankly, a fabrication spun by Canadian outlets. Case in point? His less than stellar trip to India. It’s worth noting that when our Prime Minister was queried about his notable absence at a dinner, he dismissed it as “scheduling.” But was it, really?
Look, I've got to say, this whole international relations circus is really something else. Justin Trudeau—Canada's Prime Minister, mind you—goes to these global meetings, like the G20, and can't even get a nod from India's Narendra Modi? I mean, the video footage doesn't lie: Modi post a tweet where he greeted almost every world leader there, except for two. And guess who's one of those two? That's right, Trudeau. Now why do you think that is?
Could it possibly be because the world stage knows something that maybe, just maybe, the Canadian media isn't too keen on admitting? That Trudeau is not this international darling, but actually a far less impressive figure on the world stage?
Let's not kid ourselves. When you're snubbed by one of the world's most powerful leaders, in a setting designed for diplomacy, it's not about scheduling—it's about respect, or in Trudeau's case, a lack thereof. This is the leader of a country with one of the highest projected GDPs in the world. If he's not taking Trudeau seriously, why should we?
And speaking of India, where was Jagmeet Singh amidst all of this? India, projected to be one of the globe's leading economies in the coming years, is not a nation to be ignored. Yet, Singh, for his part, has remained mum. Here's a man leading one of Canada's major political parties, and he can't even set foot in India, a country that's projected to be an economic powerhouse in the coming years.
Why? Maybe it has something to do with his participation in a Sikh separatist rally?
Look, if you're going to be an opposition leader—especially the leader of a major political party—you owe it to your constituents to be transparent. What I can't fathom is how Jagmeet Singh, despite all the criticism, still won't clarify his stance on Khalistani extremism. This isn't some minor issue we're talking about; this is a radical movement that has been tied to acts of terrorism, including the 1985 Air India bombing.
And let's talk about that for a moment. Talwinder Singh Parmar is widely believed to be the mastermind behind that terrible act, and yet, when Singh had the chance to denounce him publicly, he passed it up. That's not just irresponsible; it's unacceptable for someone who wants to lead a nation.
The hypocrisy is palpable. Singh is quick to denounce the Proud Boys but remains curiously silent on the issue of Sikh extremists. The disconnect is glaring: condemn one extremist group but sing the praises of a controversial figure like Castro?
Look, let's be honest here. I've been watching Canadian politics for years, and let me tell you, what's going on right now is nothing short of a sham. You've got Jagmeet Singh, who claims to be this stalwart opposition leader, and yet his silence on key issues is absolutely deafening. What's the point of being in the opposition if you're just going to be a paper tiger, there for the optics but not the substance?
Jagmeet Singh is eager to find his voice when its time go after Pierre Poilievre, casting him as some kind of villain in a poorly scripted drama. Yet, when it comes to Justin Trudeau's superficial virtue signaling, Singh can't find his voice & It's obvious why—without Trudeau, Singh is irrelevant. They've got this NDP supply agreement that essentially lets the NDP off the hook from holding the government accountable.
But let's get something straight, dear reader: Singh and Trudeau are two sides of the same tarnished coin. They flourished in an era where virtue signaling was the ticket to political success. You could condemn everything while standing for absolutely nothing and still get applause.
You know, I've been saying this for a long time, but it's worth repeating: Trudeau's legacy will not be one that future generations will look upon favorably. No, my friends, he won't be hailed as some sort of progressive champion or woke hero. Don't be fooled by the pretty selfies and fancy socks. Justin Trudeau will be remembered as the Pied Piper of Canadian politics. He's playing a tune that might sound sweet now, but he's leading us all off a cliff.
Let's think about it: under Trudeau's leadership, what do we have to show for ourselves? Rising taxes? Check. Out-of-control inflation? Oh, you better believe that's a check. And don't get me started on the soaring interest rates that are hitting everyday Canadians right where it hurts. Is this the Canada we want to live in? A nation so bogged down in incompetence that we can't even recognize it anymore?
And it's not just domestic policy; it's international affairs as well. The man can't even secure a respectful nod from other world leaders. He's turning Canada into a global afterthought, a laughingstock on the world stage. And we're supposed to just sit here and take it? I don't think so.
Look, I'm as patriotic a Canadian as they come, and from Vancouver to Ottawa, from sea to shining sea, I am deeply concerned about the path we're on. It's riddled with hypocrisy and double standards. If you're not part of Trudeau's ideological tribe, you're deemed an outsider, an enemy of progress, a relic of the past. Well, let me tell you something: principles matter. Integrity matters. Leadership matters.
So, as we approach 2025, it's time to ask ourselves some hard questions. Do we want more of the same—more empty promises, more failure to deliver, more division? Or are we ready to say enough is enough? Are we ready for a Canada that stands up for its citizens, that respects its history while forging a new path forward? A Canada led by someone who actually knows what they're doing?
The choice will be yours, but remember this: legacies are written by actions, not hashtags. Justin Trudeau's real legacy is unfolding before our very eyes, and trust me, it's not one any of us will want to tell our grandchildren about. If we don't take action in 2025, we're implicitly endorsing this disastrous course. And I, for one, can't stand by and watch that happen. Not on my watch, dear reader. Not on my watch.
#cdn
The Liberals tell this same lie about oil and gas. They say no-one will buy Canadian oil and gas if we don't have a carbon tax.
No OPEC country has a carbon tax, and they've never had higher demand for oil.
Trudeau in 2015: Vote for me & I will make your housing more affordable.
Trudeau in 2023: Housing prices have doubled, rents have doubled, mortgage payments have doubled —but it’s not my problem. #cdnpoli
Trudeau now claims the federal government—which controls banking rules, mortgage insurance, and fiscal policy—has nothing to do with housing.
Then why did he promise that he would make it cheaper?
https://t.co/q4l1kb2OZf
At food basics: $10 for 5 apples. $4 for a puny acorn squash. $14 sack of grapes. 1st born sack of cherries. All you can hear at the checkout is people bitching about @JustinTrudeau#carbontax#TrudeauBrokeCanada