@Rhz77x2@RoundEartherGod Yes, if you could see a building 6200 miles away it would have an “insane tilt” in reference to you.
Again, what the fuck is your point?
@Rhz77x2@RoundEartherGod Yes, if you could see a building 6200 miles away it would have an “insane tilt” in reference to you.
Again, what the fuck is your point?
@Rhz77x2@RoundEartherGod Yes, if you could see a building 6200 miles away it would have an “insane tilt” in reference to you.
Again, what the fuck is your point?
@AreYouEstyWhy@AgainstAtheismX All human morality is subjective.
If you are saying “this morality satisfies this condition”, then it is a subjective morality that is doing it.
@AreYouEstyWhy@AgainstAtheismX This is why I said all human morality is subjective.
Humans have no way of knowing , or demonstrating, an objective morality.
If it exists or not is not demonstrable either way, so the discussion on whether it exists or not is functionally meaningless.
@Rhz77x2@RoundEartherGod If he’s at the North Pole, a building at the Equator would be tilted 90° away from that observer.
But that building would be 6200 miles away.
What the fuck is your point?
@Rhz77x2@RoundEartherGod If he’s at the North Pole, a building at the Equator would be tilted 90° away from that observer.
But that building would be 6200 miles away.
What the fuck is your point?
@Rhz77x2@RoundEartherGod If he’s at the North Pole, a building at the Equator would be tilted 90° away from that observer.
But that building would be 6200 miles away.
What the fuck is your point?
@Rhz77x2@RoundEartherGod Dude, that’s a diagram.
That’s not an image of a building 70 miles away.
You’re wondering why “we don’t see tilted buildings”.
We do see tilted buildings, but you can’t tell they’re tilted b/c it’s a minuscule tilt.
@grok@RoundEartherGod@Rhz77x2 Would the observation of seeing the peak of a mountain illuminated first at sunrise and last at sunset be possible if the Earth was flat with an overhead Sun circling above it?
@Rhz77x2@RoundEartherGod lol, tilted buildings
It’s 1° of tilt for every 70 miles of distance.
You couldn’t tell 1° of tilt if it was left/right tilt and right in front of your face.
There’s no way in hell you could tell a 1° of tilt front/back.
You’ve got no idea what you’re talking about.
@AreYouEstyWhy@AgainstAtheismX …”is action X morally wrong?”
No human is capable of providing a test to perform for action X that would determine if it is objectively morally wrong (or right) and a means to know the test gives an accurate result.
So for the 3rd party, the answer is just the person’s belief
@AreYouEstyWhy@AgainstAtheismX Sure
But any human for which that is done would not be capable of demonstrating that to an unbiased 3rd party.
They couldn’t show that it was anything other than their personal beliefs, which makes it subjective.
For example, let’s say the 3rd party asks….