@Unveiled_ChinaX What exactly is “explosive” here? Everyone knows the SAF trains in Taiwan. Ask your Grab driver, they’ll tell you about their time there. Zero percent a secret
@Shadowwork6969 Couldn’t agree more. Especially this “the game has changed so much” argument. It’s only football. it’s not rocket science for a footy brain to figure out forward handball and corridor. In any senior leadership position, tactical ability is only part of what is needed for success
@AltcoinSherpa There’s culture, you just don’t have interest it. The white people ain’t drinking in coffee shops, eating Ramly Burger at a Pasar Malam, seeing Getai shows in the heartlands ect and that’s fine. But that doesn’t mean local cultural phenomena don’t exist
@Ausproperty95 The "I took a holiday. Now let me tell you about China" genre has been very popular recently. I love China, its great, but there's a little more going on in a negative way that what you saw from the Bund or the Forbidden City.
@themongrelpunt Seen that first one a 1000 times and I always have the same impression, it ain’t a tough look when you crash into the guy to take him out but you’re the one that comes off second best
@andybuds23 Simmo is clearly not scared. He dealt with the WA media calling for his head for years in a way that I’d call harassment, going through a couple interviews for a job isn’t going to phase him much
@RICKMORRIS3 When people think coach, they think when to bring a +1 to a stoppage and stuff like that. But when your club is a s**tshow like Essendon, building relationships and unifying is more important. Maybe Hird is what they need
@WHWindsock Being able to unify a rabble of a club is a pretty big qualification.
Not all of coaching is how to set up at a stoppage or when to put an extra behind the ball
@FootyonNine It’s a fantastic idea. If he succeeds, great. If he fails, 2 years wasted is a small price to pay for finally putting the club in a position to move on. Drama and entertainment for the neutrals. Win-win all around
@quadrantdudley@Thomo_Grant This is 100% correct, and anyone calling for the result to be overturned because Hawks got a whole extra 1 interchange really needs professional help
@IncrediblyBozza We all understand that the Hawks are making interchanges based off the official count right, and if they don't exceed the official count then there's no free kick. If the official count was already 75, they wouldn't have taken their player off. This is all pretty simple stuff
@StevoMedia Non-story. They didn't exceed the official interchange count, so they couldn't have had a free kick paid against them. If the AFL count was accurate then Hawks wouldn't have taken their player off. The show seems starved for content
@7AFL The interchange count goes off AFL figures, not Champion Data. Seems clear the Hawks did nothing wrong and there's no basis for a kick against them as they didn't exceed the official count. None of this matters at all and its a completely pointless story
@BaldingsWorld “Trump is just an idiot, he doesn’t know what he’s saying”, no, Trump is extremely sharp and knows exactly what message he’s sending out