@_Superjudge@LifeInThe306 Then remove that talking point so that they have one less lever to pull, since its an irrelevant measure anyway?
Name me one advantage of keeping the tarrif in place?
@ToughCallPod@LifeInThe306 Show me the govt and govt funded media outlets in thebUS that spend 75% of their coverage on calling our PM/country insulting names 7 days a week? Don't pretend this isn't almost all one-sided. Our politicians and media have been insulting them for a decade straight
@ToughCallPod@LifeInThe306 The hysterical anti americanism and anti trump propaganda has resulted in political decisions that just harm average Canadians, like the booze ban.
He has the worlds largest and most powerful consumer market access, military, intelligence services, economy, and currency....
@ToughCallPod@LifeInThe306 Eschewing leverage that you have at hand to help save Canadian families from losing their jobs is poor leadership, especially when it's underwritten by partisan politics. Simply put, its dumb not to use this to our advantage over "orange-man-bad"
@ToughCallPod@LifeInThe306 Oh, okay so let's just thumb our nose at them and watch the lives and livelihoods of our citizens get destroyed and do nothing about it.
At least they can stick it to Trump while in a bread line..
@ToughCallPod@LifeInThe306 Your question is a bit confusing, but my point is we could remove the dairy restrictions and in return get relief on auto, aluminum, steel, or soft wood lumber tarriffs. Doesn't that make more sense than maintaining a rule that you say isnt ever triggered anyway?
@ToughCallPod@LifeInThe306 Irritant to the US, they've said so themselves. My question is, if its never triggered, why not remove it to get a better deal for Canadians? Why maintain something that isnt used that just pisses off our most important trading partner?