@blackchainyogi@BitcoinPierre you mean it does everything and is actually decentralized hence why randomly "updating" rules for network is hard, only centralized networks are easy to "update".
@Guyonabuffalowo@DHSgov@grok his priors might make it breach of something but I don't see a threat just a guy confusing basic border enforcement with ww2 folks who mass imprisoned their own citizens. he said "should" and described the nonsense sounding more like nuremberg trials. maybe call to action was it
@Bierhalter2006@DHSgov you forgot how many attempts there were and even the times they missed the agents and hit other 2 illegals fatally instead accidentally. there hasn't been almost a single day without fascist left assaulting someone like innocents with red hats or in uniform they suspect is ice
@JDLuckenbach@DHSgov illegals are not immigrants, they never got permission to immigrate, they broke in. there has been an assault or an act of violence almost every day by anti-ice leftists and fatalities from shots aimed at ice facilities, kirk, moltovs, bricks, leftist islamists & trans shooters
@tohonestycom@PARABOLIT so basically not in any way centralized. when people decide independently there is no evidence of central control. fully centralized means 1 party in control which isn't relevant here
@ctoLarsson who cares. there has always been much more bitcoin than that always capable of doing exactly same thing with market. it's not relevant long term.
@IanSmith_HSA@BobMcElrath@murchandamus up to 130 bits for known public key (used p2pkh) and up to 69 bits for unknown pubkey (unused p2pkh). bc for pubkey there's a much faster pollard's kangaroo algorithm for solving afaik.
@BobMcElrath@murchandamus I find it difficult to care if someone spends existing coins. it was always the assumption most coins could be spent. plenty of incentive to move coins to quantum safe addresses when possible without need to create new incentives.
@dybcrypto@BitcoinArchive it wouldn't be a soft fork as you'd have to know the keys to use them in any way. regardless it doesn't matter if post quantum unused coins are spent by others, plenty of time to move if necessary by those who are still around.
@BitcoinArchive yeah no, loss is already incentive enough to move coins if you can, none of this is necessary. and the whole phrase to recover it later is nonsense since countless addresses didn't use any phrase and just generated private key directly