Devang

[Devang @devangcfx]

@_0xMRJ @foraxisofficial @0xMRJ_ I really need bro 🥲

[MRJ @_0xMRJ]

🎁 BIG GIVEAWAY — MRJ × forAxis 🔥

🏆 6 × $5K Accounts Up for Grabs! 💰

TO ENTER:
• Follow @foraxisofficial @0xMRJ_ @0xMRJ_

• Register here: https://t.co/qUqOEwxw2n

• Like ❤️
• Comment 💬
• Repost 🔁
• Tag a trader 👥

🎯 6 Winners. 6 Chances to Win.

Don’t miss your chance! 👀🔥

#forAxis #Giveaway #PropFirm #FundedTrader #Trading #Forex #MT5

[Liftsntrades @Liftsntrades]

🎁 BACK FROM WORK — TIME FOR A GIVEAWAY! 🔥

I’m giving away **3× SharkFunded Bolt **Accounts 🚀.

How to enter:
1️⃣ Follow @Liftsntrades & @SharkFundedfirm
2️⃣ Tag 2 friends 👥 & Repost
3️⃣ **Join our **Discord 💬.https://t.co/7mZtIbkzLf
That’s it. Simple. 😎
🏆 3 Winners
📢 Winners will be announced in our Discord
Good luck, everyone! 🍀🔥

[Devang @devangcfx]

@propfirmsupdate @Aliatcx Clarify this 🧐

[Prop Firms Update @propfirmsupdate]

No-one is building a narrative, Mr – @Aliatcx.

We’re just trying to show the reality – which you don’t want to show.

If you guys are paying everyone, why are 25% of your audience calling your firm a “SCAM”? 👀

Proof: https://t.co/eQeqFa33NH

[Devang @devangcfx]

@PropFirmsGuru @Trustpilot @FTMarketslive Trust pilot can't approve positive reviews

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

@Trustpilot a public warning is a serious act.
So answer this in public.

Why did you put a fake reviews label on @FTMarketslive without naming the reviews, the reviewers, or the evidence?

Why did you ignore a written offer to verify every review with purchase history, KYC, trading records, payout data, and support logs?

Why are 5-star reviews from paid, funded traders being rejected or removed, while 1-star reviews remain?

Why was Wei from Singapore treated as fake after 48 payouts totaling $60,828.12?

A warning with no case file is not consumer protection.
It is a smear that traders now have to look past.

In January 2026 that label appeared on FTM Trustpilot page.

FTM challenged it immediately and followed up.

The reply, in effect, was policy language rather than proof.

Since then the pattern has been one-sided.
Traders who were paid their genuine reviews were blocked.

FTM has more than 30,000 traders and processes large payouts.

There is no wave of unpaid-withdrawal claims on X. Since the warning, the firm says the business grew fourfold.

That is traders voting with their own money.

FTM also publishes a breakdown of every 1-star review in Discord: account history, the rule in question, and the chat record.

If the concern is honesty, that is the standard a review platform should meet as well.

@Trustpilot, this is not fair. Produce the evidence or remove the warning.

Stop burying verified 5-star reviews.

[Devang @devangcfx]

@propwatchmedia I also facing same problem

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨 BREAKING: LUCID TRADING’S KYC ISSUE NEEDS ANSWERS

A growing number of traders are reporting issues with Lucid Trading’s KYC process.

Some claim their verification is denied before they can even complete KYC, while others have submitted all required documents and remain stuck on “Under Review” for several days.

The impact is straightforward: traders are losing valuable trading days while waiting for account access.

This isn’t about one isolated complaint anymore. The repeated reports around KYC delays, early denials and prolonged reviews deserve a clear explanation.

@TradingLucid @ajtradinglucid , what’s happening with the verification process, and what timeline should affected traders expect?

Traders need clarity, access and transparency.
Not days of uncertainty.

[Devang @devangcfx]

@propwatchmedia @GuardianFutures What are you doing @GuardianFutures why reject payout without any reason

[PropWatch @propwatchmedia]

🚨BREAKING: $10K PAYOUT REJECTION — THE FULL PICTURE MATTERS.

A trader claimed @GuardianFutures rejected his $10,000 payout for hedging while providing “zero evidence.”

But the evidence tells a different story.

The accounts flagged by the firm were linked through opposing positions across multiple accounts ,the exact activity covered under its prohibited hedging/reverse-trading rules.

The trader’s defence then shifted:
From “No evidence.” To “Those are my old accounts.” To “I was already paid $10K before.”

But a previous payout doesn’t erase trading activity later identified in a risk review.

And after the additional evidence was reviewed, the conclusion was straightforward:

The hedging allegation was supported.

Credit to @Shubhankan007 for directly stepping in, accelerating the case, getting the additional proof on the table, and helping get the full picture reviewed.

And respect to @seanbaint for handling the situation transparently and allowing the evidence to speak for itself.

This is why the full case matters.
Don’t build a “firm scammed trader” narrative before checking the evidence.

@seanbaint @GuardianFutures

[Devang @devangcfx]

@propfirmsupdate @GuardianFutures @GuardianFutures we know you are best firm , but what is this why you reject payout

[Prop Firms Update @propfirmsupdate]

🚨 $10K Payout Rejected – @GuardianFutures

This trader $10,000 payout was rejected and five $50K Reserve accounts were breached for alleged hedging.

But the proof provided reportedly shows trades from five OLD evaluation accounts from August 3.

Those accounts are NOT the accounts connected to the rejected payout.

The trader started trading the rejected accounts on September 2 and had already received a separate $10K payout from Blue Guardian on August 18 using different accounts.

@seanbaint – review this case & pay him as soon as possible.

[Devang @devangcfx]

@propfirmsupdate @EquityEdgeUK @P_AreaScatter Please approve payout

[Prop Firms Update @propfirmsupdate]

🚨 $4.2K Payout Rejected – Trader Requests Evidence

@EquityEdgeUK rejected this trader (@P_AreaScatter) $4,200 Payout after he completed the challenge.

According to the trader:

• Initial reason: "Group Trading"

• He requested the accounts, names and trades involved

• The explanation later reportedly changed to device linkage

• No IPs, hardware IDs, timestamps or logs were reportedly provided

The trader is asking for clear evidence supporting the alleged Violation.

Hey @berkayglife – can you clarify this vase and provide the evidence behind the allegations?

[Devang @devangcfx]

@PropFirmsGuru @SureLeverage @SureLeverage it's too bad

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

A trader received a $10,000 2-step account with @SureLeverage passed the evaluation, and was one day away from payout eligibility.

Shortly after, the partnership was cancelled, the accounts were marked breached/invalid, and the conditions changed.

After the trader said this would be made public, the accounts were returned but with new consistency rules that made the account much harder to trade.

$750 payout was later requested and, after back-and-forth, around $350–$380 was received.

This was kept quiet for a long time because it shouldn’t look like a personal attack.

Overall, the firm isn’t bad.
There are traders who have had decent experiences.

What needs to be asked, respectfully, is this:

Why are so many partnerships being terminated with the explanation that engagement or reach isn’t enough?

From what is coming out, that does not appear to be the full story.

This is being looked into further because traders and partners deserve clearer answers.

This isn’t about revenge.
It’s about transparency.
If the firm is willing to address this openly will be appreciated.

Because it the start the firm was already aware of reach and engagement so why sudden termination?.

I know a lot of people who was given a reason of performance but this is not the full story I'm on it with a few other people we will find it out and will address it publicly as well.

This is not a threat it's a fair worry.

[Devang @devangcfx]

@PropFirmsGuru @Pipstonecapital Pipstone fire 🔥🔥🔥

[Prop Firms Guru @PropFirmsGuru]

🏆 EXCEPTIONAL WEEK. WORLD-CLASS TRADERS. OUTSTANDING PAYOUTS.

congratulation to last week elite payout holders at @Pipstonecapital.

global class of disciplined professionals who turned strategy into substantial rewards.

🌍 Top Rewards of the Week

🇮🇳 Saif Alam — $7,900.33
🇩🇪 Ali Noor — $7,080.20
🇺🇸 Mendes Z — $4,591.00
🇮🇹 Maria Roberts — $4,399.40
🇮🇳 Bobby Jaspreet — $3,700.00

Every week the community grows stronger.
real traders, real results, real withdrawals.

This is more than a leaderboard.
This is proof of what consistent execution and a firm that actually pays can deliver.

The next chapter belongs to those ready to write it.

Pipstone Capital Changing lives.

[Devang @devangcfx]

@propfirmtrack @EquityEdgeUK @P_AreaScatter It's totally wrong @EquityEdgeUK