Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago

धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

हर भव में किसी ना किसी कारण वर्ष हमारे प्राण गए थे चाहे व एक्सीडेंट हो या कुछ! पर इस भव में अगर शत्रुंजय गिरिराज, सम्मेद शिखर या गिरनार या शासन की रक्षा हेतु प्राण त्यागने पड़े तो भी कोई संकोच नहीं।

#savepalitana #savegiriraj #saveshatrunjay #tirthraksha #sammedshikharji #girnar

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

Facts & Truth of this silly man.

[Tanvi Jain 🇮🇳 @TanviSolanki_]

कोई कितना गिर सकता है सफेद पट्टी को लाल खून से रंग देगा
जब बुद्धि भ्रष्ट हो जाती है तब इंसान कुछ भी कर सकता है। जब सज्जन समाज दुर्जन का इलाज नहीं करता तो पूरा समाज भुगतता है। न्यूज चैनल को मजा है कमाई हो रही हैं वेदपाठक की भी कमाई।
क्या समाजसेवको देश का बड़ा नुकसान होता नही दिख रहा?

[Jain Media @JainMedia]

आज सफ़ेद पट्टी का विरोध हो रहा है..
कल गणपति का भी विरोध होगा..
आज 'जैन जिहाद' बोलनेवाले कल 'गणपति जिहाद' बोले तो आश्चर्य नहीं होगा..
ऐसे लोगों से सावधान होना चाहिए।

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

Shameful Act by a silly man just for his ego boost & to be in a controversy.

We failed once more😔

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

Again & again saying Michammi Dukadam by Prasad what does he trying to portray??

[Mumbai Tak @mumbaitak]

Mumbai White Line issue: 'आम्ही गोंधळ घालून बकऱ्याचा बळी दिला तर चालेल का?' प्रसाद वेदपाठक

[Pu₹vesh | SEBI®️RA @TA_Purvesh]

ऑयल पेंट इसलिए किया जाता है ताकि पैरों को गर्मी न लगे। तुम्हारा परिवार भी उसपे चलेगा तो कोई नहीं रोकेगा।

उसे धार्मिक प्रतीक बनाकर किसी जीव की हिंसा करनेकी बात करना अपने आप में एक मूर्खता है। और उसी को न्यूज बनाना आपके चैनल की न्यूज में दरिद्रता दीखता है।

सफेद रंग कब से किसी एक धर्म का निजी प्रतीक हो गया?

अगर रंग ही धार्मिक पहचान है तो फिर: 📘 अपने बच्चों को नीले पन्नों वाली किताब ही देना, 📗 या हरे रंग के पान वाले कोई पेड़ मत रखना अपनी सोसाइटी मे, 🟪 और फोन का स्क्रीन बैकग्राउंड वायलेट न हो तो फोन भी तोड़ देना।

रंगों को धर्म से जोड़कर तर्क नहीं बनते।
किसी भी जीव के प्रति क्रूरता को सही ठहराने के लिए बहाने बनते हैं। अगर बकरा काटने से आपको लगता है कि कोई बड़ा बुद्धि का काम कर रहे हो तो करो।

तर्क से लड़ो, रंगों से नहीं।

[Sadhvi Prachi @Sadhvi_prachi]

ISKA KAAM HAI HINDU VS JAINS KARANA

Don't fall in his trap

[Singh Varun @singhvarun]

A white strip painted for barefoot walkers within the boundaries of a housing soceity has "sparked controversy" because one resident says he wasn't consulted.

Here's what the law actually says.
In a housing society, individual consent is not required. If the managing committee passes a decision in the general body with majority approval, and it doesn't violate the model by-laws, it can be implemented. Period.

The Maharashtra State Co-operative Appellate Court reaffirmed this as recently as May 21, 2026 (Appeal No. 24 of 2026): the general body is the supreme authority.

The aggrieved resident had one job: to tell us whether this was discussed in the society meeting, whether the majority consented or dissented, and if he was in the minority, why he believed the decision violated the rules.

He didn't. Instead, he went viral, which he is entitled to, but...

If he genuinely believes the decision was unlawful, the correct route is a complaint to the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies so that it doesn't remain just a social media post and his campaign appears genuine..

By withholding every legally relevant fact, the complainant didn't raise a housing issue. He ran a clickbait campaign.

[Rachit Jain @rachitpjain]

Mr. Vedpathak,

You are highlighting the issue of the white line on social media. However, in your interview with the news channel, the society office bearers clearly stated that the decision was taken collectively during a committee meeting.

If you had concerns about the decision, they could have been raised in the appropriate forum with the society management. Unfortunately, instead of seeking clarity first, you chose to present the matter publicly in a manner that created unnecessary controversy.

What many people found objectionable was not the fact that you raised a concern, but the way it was raised. Using terms such as "Jain Jihad" was completely inappropriate and unfair. Such language wrongly associates a peaceful community and religious tradition with hostility, which naturally hurt the sentiments of many people.

Constructive dialogue is always welcome, but public discourse should be based on facts, context, and respectful language. Differences of opinion can be expressed without using inflammatory terms that divide communities and distort the actual issue.

A simple effort to understand the reasoning behind the practice before making such allegations could have led to a far more meaningful and respectful discussion.

Link of the news https://t.co/7HMxmyuqhU

@prasadvedpathak
@TanviSolanki_ @arpitsinger @fpjindia

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

Wait for the end..

Just to satisfy his ego & for getting attention he has picked up this useless point of paint. Nothing else.

@arpitsinger @JainMedia @JagoJainJagore @MeetShah144 @anamikamber @TanviSolanki_

[Sadhvi Prachi @Sadhvi_prachi]

Ye leftist pehle se hindu virodhi hai

Society dispute ko jain jihad bolne wala adharmi hai

We stand strong with jain Dharma and jain saint and sadhvi ji

Jo jain Dharma microorganisms ko bachane ki baat karta ho ushe tere jaise mansik adharmi ka koi certificate nei chahiye

[Arpit Shah @arpitsinger]

First and most importantly...no Jain monk asked for this. Not one. No sadhu. No sadhvi. No guru. No religious authority issued any demand, directive, or instruction to paint this pathway.

This was done voluntarily, by residents of the society, out of their own goodwill and consideration. It was not ordered from above. It was not a religious mandate. No monk showed up and said "paint this before I walk." That is not how Jain monasticism works — and anyone with genuine familiarity with Jain monastic tradition would know that.

Jain monks do not make demands of householders. They accept what is offered. They do not negotiate, lobby, or assert territorial claims.

So the entire premise of your post — that some authority "demanded an exclusive pathway" — is factually incorrect.

Second — this is not a religious marking.

There is no Om. No Swastik. No Jain symbol. No scripture. No idol. No flag.

It is white paint on a pathway. The same lime wash that has been used on Indian walls and floors for centuries. Calling it a "religious marking" is a characterization you have chosen to impose on it — it is not inherent to the paint itself. A white strip becomes a "religious imposition" only if you decide to see it that way.

Third — it is open and accessible to every resident without exception.

No one has been barred from using this pathway. There is no gate, no rope, no signage, no restriction. Every resident — of every faith, every background — walks on it freely. It is not "exclusive." The word exclusive implies others are excluded. They are not.

Now, to your broader argument — which deserves a direct response.

You write beautifully about compassion, Bhagwan Mahavir's values, and harmony. I agree with every value you invoke. But there is something important to name here:

You are appealing to Jain values — ahimsa, compassion, empathy — to ask the Jain community to remove something that harms no one.

But you tweeted with a terrible hashtag. You tagged a political party and a television news channel instead of attempting dialogue. You chose viral amplification over a society meeting.

If compassion is the standard — and we agree it should be — then it must apply to how this dispute was initiated, not just how it is resolved. Compassion does not begin with a hashtag designed to paint a minority community as an aggressor, and end with an open letter asking that same community to be understanding. Ask yourself honestly: who escalated this?

On your fear that "conflicts begin when one group's feelings are considered more important than another's": Agreed completely. Which is why we ask: whose feelings have been centred in this viral moment? A community of people who painted a footpath and said nothing — or one person who felt aggrieved and immediately reached for the most inflammatory hashtag available?

Hurt feelings are real and valid. But they do not automatically make the other party guilty. And amplifying hurt with the word "Jihad" attached is not a neutral act.

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

Just for a white paint on path we are been criticized⁉️

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

This is MURDER.

[Aacharya Vimalsagarsuriji @Vimalsagarsuri]

सेलम में संकल्प की सिद्धि का परितोष महोत्सव
वर्षितप की साधना के शानदार सामूहिक पारणे
#varshiptap #vimalsagarsuriji #jago #salem #jainism

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

🚨अभ रुके तो हम अभ गए

[Aacharya Vimalsagarsuriji @Vimalsagarsuri]

बैंगलोर की पुण्यधरा पर JITO द्वारा आयोजित नवकार महामंत्र के जाप का विराट आयोजन
#vimalsagarsuriji #jago #jito #navkarmantra #banglore

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

यह प्रभुवीर जन्म कल्याणक के नाम पर किया गया नाचगान है जो Mhisal (दिगम्बर) के जैनो द्वारा किया गया है।🫠

अगर यह आपको नही पसंद आ रहा , पर आपको श्वेताम्बर कॉन्सर्ट विगेरे पसंद आते है तो आप दोगले जैन हो।

क्योकि आपको प्रिय कॉन्सर्ट कल इस दिशामे जाएगा ही।

[Atul Bafna @abafna]

Jai Jinendra,

In view of the current situation and closure of airspace, if any Jain member is stranded in Dubai and requires accommodation or any assistance, please do not hesitate to reach out.

Our JITO member from Dubai, Rajeshbhai, has very generously come forward and offered his hotel falong with support for other essential needs during this difficult time.

We stand with you. Please feel free to contact us for any help or guidance. JITO is your family, and we are there with you in this challenging situation.

With prayers for everyone’s safety.

Team JITO International Wing
Team JITO Dubai

Helpline numbers:
Rajesh Jain [phone]
Biren Jasani [phone]
Mukesh Vora [phone]
Doulat Jain [phone]
Mahaveer Mehta [phone]
Mahaveer Jain [phone]
Nisarg Dugad [phone]
Vipin Maloo [phone]

#Jain #Jainism #Dubai #UAE #Dubaihelpline #Emergency #Jainseva

[Jago🇦🇹Jain🇦🇹Jago @devgurudharma]

प्रश्न ज़रूरी है।