Glad you asked!
1) LLMs are created by scraping all the art and writing off the internet without creator’s compensation or consent, allowing companies to make billions of stolen labor
2) This tech allows companies to then fire the very employees whose work they stole. It’s like taking your blood and using it to power your robot replacement
3) The resulting auto-generated plagiarism slurry can be extremely realistic, allowing companies, governments, scammers etc to create an infinite deluge of propaganda, fake evidence, scams, revenge porn, and addictive meaningless slop flooding our eyes from cradle to grave, a kind of reality-obliterating internet pollution at a scale beyond human comprehension.
4) That’s not even counting the massive electricity drain of the server farms that are gobbling up land and the impending economic crash when the so called “abundance” promised by Silicon Valley vultures never meets their impossible promises.
LLMs are to societal trust what toxic runoff is to drinking water. And just like the pollution that comes from Exxon Mobile, this disaster is only possible when the government abdicates its regulatory responsibility because it’s been bought off by the CEOs responsible
TLDR:
PROS: You can make Judy Hopps make out with Martin Luther King
CONS: Mass unemployment, the death of reality, a permanent underclass addicted to a digital meth slot machine
I'd like to thank Sam Altman and every single AI bro for creating the first ever "RAM run" and completely destroying all technological progress made in the past 30 years
They're trying to normalize the use of AI, btw. Don't believe for a second that every studio, hell, every artist in the industry is using it. keep broadening your horizons, learn about artists, art styles, take inspiration from culture, history, and science.
The best movies were made without it, the best games were made without it, the best comics were made without it, the best stories were made without it, the best songs were made without it. And now for some reason we really need it, there's no other way.
The European Commission lost the Chat Control 2.0 battle over access to end-to-end encrypted data. By the summer 2026, they will be back with their next attempt: Going Dark. This time some EU member states want to include VPN services.
The Going Dark initiative, or ProtectEU as the Commission now calls it, wants to “enable law enforcement authorities to access encrypted data in a lawful manner”. This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt.
The EU Commission and several member states are also looking for new rules on data retention. In a new ”Presidency outcome paper”, the member states discuss metadata retention: which websites you visit, and who is communicating with whom, when and how often. The ambition is “to have the broadest possible scope of application” and this time some member states also want the proposal to include VPN services.
Mullvad has spent the last three years opposing Chat Control 2.0 – even though the law would have affected our business positively.
We will continue to fight Going Dark with full force, regardless of whether VPNs are included or not. If VPNs are included, and if Going Dark becomes law, we will never spy on our customers no matter what.
@PhriekshoTV@ViperlL7 @MrLongTerm @DiscussingFilm Pushing AI into every single aspect of human life is extreme. Your stance is valid and I agree with you.
@PhriekshoTV@ViperlL7 @MrLongTerm @DiscussingFilm There is no point in discussing with AI defenders man. Waste of time. Their brains are already rotten and they wont accept a single argument against AI