Mark

[Mark @dexaroy]

@socratesccost Nice attempt to move the goalposts.

Water vapor is a feedback to warming, period. Warmer air holds more moisture, and water vapor is a potent greenhouse gas.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@socratesccost @blizzard219 Dessler (2010) – Water vapor feedback from climate fluctuations
https://t.co/VtwrpHHYJW

Sherwood et al. (2010) – Tropospheric water vapor, convection, and climate
https://t.co/XgVPPtQmwK

[Mark @dexaroy]

@socratesccost @blizzard219 Soden & Held (2006) – An assessment of climate feedbacks in coupled ocean–atmosphere models
https://t.co/X51oz5DxSg

Dessler, Zhang & Yang (2008) – Water-vapor climate feedback inferred from climate fluctuations, 2003–2008
https://t.co/3dH0eAvf2S

[Mark @dexaroy]

@socratesccost @blizzard219 Happer is clearly wrong then. Water vapor feedback alone is ~1.8 W/m2/K.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@socratesccost This is AI garbage - almost every point is wrong.

For starters, water vapor feedback is measured by satellite and it's positive, ~ 1.8 W/m2/K. See Dessler & Davis (2010) and Dessler et al. (2013).

[Mark @dexaroy]

@socratesccost @blizzard219 You are incorrectly using the Planck-only response.

https://t.co/RaFMsOk0FF

[Mark @dexaroy]

@socratesccost Except 0.237 C/W/m2 isn't the correct climate sensitivity factor. In reality, it's closer to 0.8 C/W/m2.

If you really were a "CRITICAL THINKER" you would have noticed this and questioned it. Shewchuk provides no source for this figure because he knows it's wrong.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@socratesccost Except 0.237 C/W/m2 isn't the correct climate sensitivity factor. In reality, it's closer to 0.8 C/W/m2.

If you really were a "CRITICAL THINKER" you would have noticed this and questioned it. Shewchuk provides no source for this figure because he knows it's wrong.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@Dr_SlopLord @djcoates_ @peakaustria The IPCC does not say that within measurement error humans haven't warmed anything.

Where are you getting this from? Cite it.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@Dr_SlopLord @djcoates_ @peakaustria Do you actually think that CO2 isn't a GHG or that the greenhouse effect doesn't exist?

You can derive the forcing from first principles using CO2 spectroscopy and the lapse rate. It's purely physics.

Happy to point you to papers if this is your contention.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@1sum1else1 @punished_minion Why should the lower house be proportional? I don't think you've actually thought this through, you're simply unhappy with the current government.

Instead of Labor majority governments we'd have Labor + Green + Ind minority / coalition governments. Is that more representative?

[Mark @dexaroy]

@1sum1else1 @punished_minion That's your opinion. Not the opinion of all the 70% who ranked the ALP second or lower.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@1sum1else1 @punished_minion "Not my first preference" isn't the same as "doesn't want".

[Mark @dexaroy]

@adamseconomics @PrueBardsley You're supposed to be a political commentator. How about you don't just repost a "story" from a literal fake news website?

Hold yourself to some standard.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@GenXTruther72 @eranga_a Lies like this should be punished with jail.

Go fuck yourself.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@GenXTruther72 @realJoeBama @JoshuaCarr43335 @denoots @LeffGeoff Seats aren't determined by the state-wide popular vote.

You vote for someone to represent your electorate. In the majority of electorates, the majority preferred the Labor candidate to represent them.

It's not that difficult to understand.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@AustRepublican @LakeRhino Never costed by AEMO.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@AustRepublican @aaronsmith None of those are costed policies. They're not even policies. Costings are published by the PBO.

[Mark @dexaroy]

@SchneidGabriel @CColose @BurgessPark2 @dabelstein How?