afcnate

arsenal

[afcnate @dexnate24]

Not posting til we win the league

[LIVELY @mc_lively_]

How long will we keep doing this in Nigeria????

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@edgaralandough Using personal incredulity doesn't disprove history. Strict moral codes have been invented by human societies for thousands of years to maintain social control.

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@Bim_Hopfan_MOG @Dream_pips @iamzioraa @Sanyaa011 If women get two benefits (money + sex), then men are actively paying for sex and giving it away. That makes demand the primary engine driving the transaction. Demand creates the market; without buyers, there is no seller.

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls Agrippa’s Trilemma isn't a positive claim that needs justification—it’s a description of how reasoning works. Calling it 'self-refuting' doesn't answer which path your 'criterion' takes: circularity, infinite regress, or dogmatic assertion?

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls Shifting the goalposts to Jesus is a complete non sequitur. You still haven't explained how you justify your criterion of coherency without falling into an infinite regress or begging the question

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls Calling it an 'internal critique' is a label, not an argument. Point out the specific contradiction in my premises, or answer the question regarding the Münchhausen Trilemma.

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls Insults aren't arguments. If questioning logic isn't radical skepticism, then explain how your worldview grounds the law of non-contradiction without relying on the logic you're questioning.

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@nonewthing Equating modern dating to the bubonic plague and claiming non-conservatives can't have faithful relationships is an extreme false dichotomy

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@7thsignal @itsasecrethk @Dream_pips @iamzioraa @Sanyaa011 Lemme just say that this whole cirgin thing is just a minor thing in my eyes when it comes to marriage. The whole concept of virginity is construct used to control women

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@7thsignal Disgusting and degrading rhetoric…

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@FacelessP01 @softly3against Sleep comes easy when the logic is sound. You should try it sometime

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@sannijimoh10 @onyeobododot @MarvinUchenna_ Exactly 💯

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls That's a bare assertion, not an argument. Distinguishing a phenomenon from its description doesn't resolve the Munchhausen Trilemma for your worldview. Care to answer the actual question?

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls A transcendental argument isn't an external anchor; it shows that your 'criterion of coherency' is epistemologically impossible without those preconditions already in place. You're trapped in Agrippa's trilemma

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls That's a goalpost shift. Relabeling it as a 'paradigm' doesn't escape the problem: if you require a foundation for the preconditions of thought, what grounds your paradigm without logic already being presupposed?

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls If logic isn't logical, then 'A' can equal 'not-A', and your argument has already refuted itself. Radical skepticism is an easy escape hatch, but it leaves your own worldview completely groundless

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@FacelessP01 @softly3against Extremes don't clarify a point—they distort it. Using a hyperbolic scenario to justify a general rule is a textbook straw man, and declaring victory when called out on it isn't an argument; it's an evasion

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@onyeobododot @sannijimoh10 @MarvinUchenna_ History shows that religious violence and forced conversions aren't exclusive to any single faith. Grouping an entire major religion with terrorist groups ignores history, text, and the vast majority of adherents who reject violence

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@Bim_Hopfan_MOG @Dream_pips @iamzioraa @Sanyaa011 Saying something is 'by design' doesn't override supply and demand. Transactions require two parties—if men stopped paying for sex, the price tag disappears regardless of supplier behavior

[afcnate @dexnate24]

@GuthrieF62784 @bdeasaka @Ephesians_Ch4 @ezoochewqu @MarcusFidelicus @DoctorPauls That's an ad hominem, not a counterargument. If you can't refute the transcendental premise, just say that.