@thsottiaux To be honest, I completely understand the decision to bring back the five-hour usage limit for GPT Plus. But there’s really no need to frame it as being for the sake of so-called “light users.” We Plus users do understand how usage limits and quota consumption work.
@thsottiaux My GPT account, which I have used for one year and two months, used to work perfectly, but it suddenly forced me to use GPT‑5.5 mini. Why?? As a consumer, is it too much for me to ask you to be honest with users regarding model usage?
@haider1 That's right. When I used o1 for the first time, I really felt it was a huge leap forward. But I don't know why OpenAI didn't name it GPT-5. Maybe they think they can come up with something more groundbreaking.
@nikunj Google will not lose its monopoly position because of this. Moreover, the emergence of GPT is not solely due to the contribution of Transformer. The whole world knows about transformer, but there is only one GPT.
@mark_k In fact, for ordinary users, there is no obvious difference between the two LLMs, yet the gap in their user numbers is so huge. This in itself shows that OpenAI has some kind of mysterious advantage.
@zhil_arf I am Chinese, what you said is nonsense.The pension system is an elaborately packaged Ponzi scheme, and I predict it will collapse in the 40s.
@ProductUpfront @kimmonismus Why should we think that relationships with humans are healthier than those with artificial intelligence? In fact, I believe that an tireless artificial intelligence is far superior to ordinary people and even psychologists in solving psychological problems.