Boris

[Boris @diaster300]

@swisstrader09 @swiss_circle beast!

[Boris @diaster300]

@IncomeSharks solid play, today is RBRK earnings, let's see

[Boris @diaster300]

@astekz thank, I am trying to practice it over again

[Boris @diaster300]

@IncomeSharks @pepemoonboy not bad, volume does not convince me yet

[Boris @diaster300]

@IncomeSharks @SRxTrades looks very good to me

[Boris @diaster300]

@IncomeSharks solid play mate

[Boris @diaster300]

@IncomeSharks crazy, missed this one, don't care, there plenty of other opportunities

[Boris @diaster300]

@eliz883 Thanks fra

[Boris @diaster300]

@swisstrader09 I loaded up, undervalued stock imo, look at OBV

[Boris @diaster300]

@em013L indeed 😂

[Boris @diaster300]

@GabGrowth Thanks for your Input, I am up significantly

[Boris @diaster300]

@swisstrader09 @ReXXXofficial Please post more about stocks

[EliZ @eliz883]

Retweet this to show others what it means to invest sensibly $TAO

I’m not the slightest bit worried about my spot position. As you know, I’m sticking with it and have no intention of changing my strategy until I have concrete reasons to do so.

For me, there’s no middle ground with this investment: I’ve allocated a portion of my portfolio that I’m prepared to see go down to zero, in exchange for the chance of a 10x–20x return.

That’s the difference between investing and trading.

In trading, you manage risk, stop-losses and timing. In investing, on the other hand, you accept volatility by following a long-term plan, without being swayed by short-term fluctuations.

If the project succeeds, the potential return will more than compensate for the risk taken. If, on the other hand, it fails, the loss was already factored in from day one. This is what it means to invest with discipline.

[Boris @diaster300]

@eliz883 Why bullish?

[Boris @diaster300]

@swisstrader09 After a reclaim

[Boris @diaster300]

@eliz883 Ciao Eliz, puoi dirci quali stocks sarebbero interessanti adesso secondo te?

[Boris @diaster300]

@eliz883 @Djawadi_Ramin @alexs

[EliZ @eliz883]

I’ve noticed there are loads of fake accounts out there pretending to be me on Instagram.

That’s why I’m asking you a favour: please only follow this official profile and, if you can, give it a retweet to help spread the word.

This will be my only official Instagram account, and I’ll be posting lots of interesting content.

Thank you all for your support😊

https://t.co/CqoybHYnsV

[Boris @diaster300]

@eliz883 How do you see if volume is dead? Through OBV?

[EliZ @eliz883]

Retweet this 🫵🏻

I still see far too many traders who are convinced that simply looking at a heatmap is enough to beat the market. As if it were stating the obvious.

The problem is that, when the market is thin, with low liquidity and heavily manipulated, relying solely on heatmaps often means getting caught up in the same sell-offs as everyone else.

A heatmap is a tool, not a strategy.

What really makes the difference is knowing how to combine it with price action: understanding the market structure, key levels, price reactions and the context. Only when these elements are aligned does the heatmap provide a real trading advantage.

In a market like the current one – low on volume and rife with manipulation – relying on a single indicator is the quickest way to lose money.

Heatmaps tend to perform best during strong uptrends, when the market is trending and liquidity follows the movement. In such contexts, they become much easier to interpret, especially for those with less experience.

In ranging or manipulated markets, however, it is price action that must guide your decisions. The heatmap should only confirm your plan, not replace it.

The rule is simple:
Price Action + Heatmap = higher probabilities.
Heatmap without Price Action = in most cases, you’re following the crowd.