Diego Vidal

Universo- Tierra - América- Ecuador - Guayaquil -Loja 🇪🇨- 🇮🇱

[La Derecha Diario Israel @DerechaDiarioIS]

🚨☪️🇦🇷🇪🇺 | "CONQUISTA SIN ARMAS": El creador de contenido Mauro, reflexiona sobre la expansión del islam en Europa, afirmando que ha ganado terreno e influencia cultural en el continente en pocas décadas mediante dinámicas sociales y políticas sin recurrir a conflictos bélicos.

[Diego Vidal @diegovidcampo]

@EmergenciasEc La vacuna diaria.

[Diego Vidal @diegovidcampo]

@runariasokuu El sector privado es asi en la realidad.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

Right now in the US, part of the Democratic Party has decided to play the "socialist" card. Days before the midterms, DSA candidates are winning primaries and the word isn't taboo anymore.

So today I'm going to show you why socialism never works. Not with ideology. With mechanics.

Let's start with a dumb question. How much should a loaf of bread cost?

You don't know. Neither do I. Nobody does. And that's exactly the point.

The price of a loaf of bread is the instant synthesis of millions of pieces of information that no single person holds: the wheat harvest in Kansas, the price of gas for the oven, the baker's wages, the shop's rent, a drought in Argentina, a war on the Black Sea, whether people feel like bread this morning or a bagel.

In 1920, Ludwig von Mises published a paper that should have ended the debate. His argument: without private ownership of the means of production, those means are never exchanged. No exchange, no prices. No prices, no economic calculation. The planner can't know whether a steel mill is worth more than a dam or a hospital. He's flying blind. He can't even tell that he's wrong.

In 1945, Friedrich Hayek drove the point home in "The Use of Knowledge in Society." Useful knowledge is scattered across millions of minds. The baker knows things about his neighborhood that no ministry ever will. Prices are a telecommunications system: when tin becomes scarce somewhere in the world, its price rises, and millions of users economize on it without even knowing why. No committee, no ministry, no plan can replicate that. The market isn't an ideology. It's a distributed information processor.

Then Milton Friedman picked up a simple pencil. The wood comes from Washington State, the graphite from South America, the rubber from Malaysia. Thousands of people who don't know each other, don't speak the same language, maybe even hate each other, cooperate to make something none of them could make alone. Nobody gave them orders. Prices were enough.

Now run the experiment in reverse. Set the price yourself.

Cap rents below market: landlords stop maintaining, stop building, housing disappears. Swedish economist Assar Lindbeck, a man of the left, said rent control is the most efficient technique known for destroying a city, short of bombing it.

Cap the price of flour: shelves empty, lines form, the black market takes over. Venezuela, 2016. The country with the largest oil reserves on earth, and people standing in line for hours to eat. Nearly 8 million Venezuelans eventually fled.

Socialism smashes the thermometer and then acts surprised that the fever keeps rising.

And this is where it gets serious.

Because when the plan fails, and it always fails, the planner has two options. Admit the plan is wrong. Or blame the people. Saboteurs, speculators, kulaks, enemies of the people.

He always picks the second one.

Hayek saw it in 1944 in The Road to Serfdom, in a chapter with a chilling title: Why the Worst Get on Top. A central plan requires central power. Central power attracts those who crave power. And when reality resists the plan, reality has to be broken. Which means people have to be broken.

Stalin. He collectivizes the land. Output collapses. He blames the peasants and seizes the harvests. The Holodomor, 1932-1933: millions starved to death in Ukraine, the breadbasket of Europe. Add the Gulag, the purges, the deportations.

Mao. The Great Leap Forward, 1958-1962. Backyard furnaces producing useless steel, insane grain quotas, local officials inflating numbers to avoid punishment, and the state requisitioning food based on those fake numbers. The result: the worst famine in human history. Estimates range from 30 to 45 million dead.

Pol Pot. The Khmer Rouge abolish money, markets, property, and empty the cities. The dream of total planning, carried all the way. In four years, roughly one in four Cambodians dies.

Hitler. He sent communists to the camps, but his party called itself National Socialist and the economy answered to the plan and the party. Companies stayed private on paper, but the state decided what to produce, at what price, and for whom. Hayek dedicated The Road to Serfdom "to the socialists of all parties" precisely because he saw the same root: the idea that the state must steer society toward a collective goal, and the individual must step aside.

Different eras. Different continents. Different cultures. Same mechanism. Same ending.

This isn't a bug. It's a feature of the system. Remove prices and you remove information. Remove information and you remove the ability to correct. And when you can no longer correct through prices, you correct through force.

So let me say it plainly. Socialism always starts nice. A rent freeze. Public grocery stores. Make "the rich" pay. Nobody promises the Gulag on day one.

But if America truly goes down this road, the rest of the story is already written. The plan will fail. There will need to be culprits. There will need to be power to punish them. And a socialist government holding the American state apparatus, its surveillance capabilities, its technology, its military, wouldn't be a regional tragedy. It could be the greatest tragedy in history.

The 20th century paid for this lesson with tens of millions of lives. We don't get to forget it in one generation.

Prices aren't the enemy of the people. Prices are the voice of the people.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

My post about Hitler and the far right got millions of views. Clearly, it hit a nerve. So today I'm going to show you, step by step, why the notion of "far right" as it's used in France makes almost no sense. And why the people who wield it are usually the last ones who should be lecturing anyone.

Let's start with the only question that matters: what makes a political system work or fail? To a very large extent, it's the economy. A country that produces wealth, that lets its citizens create, trade and build, stays standing. A country that destroys that collapses, no matter how beautiful its slogans are.

And in economics, there are really only two worldviews.

The first is collectivism. The idea that the State knows better than you. That it must plan production, set prices, run companies, decide what you earn, what you buy, and eventually what you think. The individual is just a cog serving a grand collective project: the class, the nation, the race, the people.

The second is freedom. Capitalism, property, individual liberty, individual responsibility. The idea that millions of people creating value for one another produce infinitely more prosperity than an office of planners, however brilliant they may be.

Now look at the list of the great totalitarian regimes of the 20th century. Stalin: total planning, forced collectivization, millions dead. Mao: the Great Leap Forward and the deadliest famine in human history. Pol Pot: money abolished, cities emptied, nearly a quarter of Cambodia's population exterminated. Mussolini, the man who coined the word fascism: "Everything within the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State." And Hitler, leader of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, whose program proclaimed "the common good before individual good." He subjected the entire German economy to State plans: the Four-Year Plan, frozen prices and wages, unions dissolved into a single state labor front, industrialists producing whatever the regime decided.

Their flags were different. Their designated enemies were different. But the machinery was the same: the individual doesn't exist, only the collective matters, and the State decides everything.

Why does it always end in totalitarianism? Because collectivism doesn't work. And when a system doesn't work, it has only two options: admit failure or force people. They always choose force.

Ludwig von Mises proved it as early as 1920: without free prices, without a market, a planner simply cannot know what to produce, how much, or at what cost. He is flying blind. A planned economy isn't a less efficient version of the market. It's an impossibility.

Friedrich Hayek drew the political conclusion in 1944 in The Road to Serfdom, a book he dedicated "to the socialists of all parties." One chapter is titled "The Socialist Roots of Naziism." Another, "Why the Worst Get on Top." For Hayek, controlling the economy isn't controlling one sector among others. It is "the control of the means for all our ends." Whoever controls your bread controls your life. Then your speech. Then your thoughts.

Milton Friedman put it his own way: a society that puts equality before freedom ends up with neither.

So we know exactly what works. It's not an opinion. It's a century of real-world experiments. Listen to the Austrian school, Mises and Hayek, with Friedman from Chicago alongside them: economic freedom, limited government, individual responsibility.

And this is where we get to the great accusatory inversion. Part of the left-wing press spends its time screaming fascism. Why? Because the fascism fantasy is the best way to never talk about the track record of their own ideas. Deep down, they know: if their collectivist program were applied all the way, it wouldn't work, because a collective economy cannot work. And an economy that doesn't work always ends up having to coerce, surveil and ban. In other words, it becomes exactly what they claim to be fighting. The real heirs of totalitarian logic are not the ones being pointed at.

So who gets called "far right" in 2026? People who want safe cities. People who want to keep their culture. People who just want to live a peaceful life, raise their kids, and not have to board up their shop every weekend. People who want the law to apply to everyone.

If that's the far right, then the word no longer means anything. And maybe that was the point.

[Luis Espinosa Goded @luisesgo]

Esto es el tercer mundo:
No tener electricidad porque un burócrata inepto y vago no pone su sello a un proyecto.

(Y más atrás: necesitar ese sello pues hay una Constitución socialista y pobrista que declara al sector eléctrico monopolio estatal).

[Dr. Eli David @DrEliDavid]

מילטון פרידמן מסביר שצריך לסגור את כל משרדי ממשלה חוץ מביטחון, חוץ, אוצר ומשפטים:

- משרד החקלאות: לסגור
- משרד הכלכלה: לסגור
- משרד החינוך: לסגור
- משרד האנרגיה: לסגור
- משרד הבריאות: לצמצם
- משרד השיכון: לסגור
- משרד העבודה: לסגור
- משרד התחבורה: לסגור

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

It's been months that I keep saying Hitler was far left. Every time, thousands of clowns show up in my replies to give me history lessons.

So I made a video to answer all these low IQ takes at once.

Topic closed. Next.

[Irving Gatell @IrvingGatell]

Ah, qué caray con estos valores familiares promovidos por la tradición occidental.
Tan efectivos para hacer feliz a la gente.

[Diego Vidal @diegovidcampo]

@MOSSADil He wasn’t mistaken; he said it because he likes to foster the idea that terrorism doesn’t exist, since, in a way, he supports it.

[Diego Vidal @diegovidcampo]

@sfrantzman Hamás is not just a number, it is part of the population.

[Irving Gatell @IrvingGatell]

Este pobre pendejo no tiene idea de cuántas familias en todo el mundo tienen trabajo y sustento seguro gracias a la venta de yates.
Los que odian al capitalismo son los que no entienden cómo funcionan las cosas.

[J. F. Carpio @jfcarpio]

@amarualertas Suban el precio de la luz para que la gente consuma menos. Funciona diez veces mejor que las campañas de conscienciación.

[Diego Vidal @diegovidcampo]

@KarinaLMariani Es un antisemita que odia a los judíos. Generaliza a todos por igual.

[Johannes Kaiser @Jou_Kaiser]

Francia tiene salud pública gratuita, educación pública gratuita, una semana laboral reducida de 35 horas, planes sociales para los desempleados, leyes de control de alquileres, jardín infantil gratuito y posnatal prolongado, pensiones de reparto, subsidios para la industria, el transporte, empresas energéticas nacionalizadas, regulaciones e impuestos sobre el carbón, así como estrictas leyes de protección ambiental. La cuota del Estado alcanza el 57,5 %. Francia debería ser el país de ensueño de la izquierda y, sin embargo, salen a la calle y prenden fuego a TODO. Los zurdos son insaciables. La ideología de izquierda conduce al caos y a sociedades absolutamente disfuncionales.

[Luis Espinosa Goded @luisesgo]

¿De verdad que hay muchos quiteños que mientras están en el atasco para llegar a ninguna parte, andan por calles sin asfaltar mientras vigilan que no les roben su preocupación es “medir su huella de carbono”?
😳😳😳
Esto también es corrupción, emplear los recursos públicos no para el bienestar de los ciudadanos sino para cualquier pendejada que sea del interés de los políticos.

[Isaac @isaacrrr7]

Ni una sola tienda propiedad de musulmanes ni ninguna mezquita fueron saqueadas durante los disturbios en Francia.

En una calle de Marsella, donde el 40% de la población es musulmana, TODOS los negocios propiedad de judíos fueron incendiados, mientras que ni un solo negocio propiedad de musulmanes resultó afectado.

La probabilidad de que esto ocurriera por puro azar es de 1 entre 123 000 millones.

Se trató de pogromos dirigidos. Los alborotadores disponían de listas de direcciones que indicaban qué establecimientos debían atacar.

Vía @realMaalouf

[Diego Vidal @diegovidcampo]

@KaterMutze @elxavi32 @luisesgo @grok Judeo- cristiana hacer referencia a la tradición heredada por los judios de los evangelios que occidente aplicó en cierta forma con la tradición grecoromana. Y normal esos judíos tambien vivieron las epocas del talmud ( Debates de la ley) .

[Luis Espinosa Goded @luisesgo]

Lo peor es el impersonal de las noticias “después de que fuera incendiado como parte de las protestas”,

No, cabrón colaboracionista, después de que inmigrantes africanos musulmanes y comunistas radicales enemigos de nuestra civilización y cultura lo incendiaran.
Que si no hablamos claro no pensamos claro y no luchamos claro.