Digol

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@midaswi @hiamsoares @miguelcosta46 @wilderko The more appropriate term is that the Parliament failed at rejecting it. The majority voted against Chat Control 1.0, but they didn't reach the absolute majority

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@pa1ar @OldRktSciGuy @Tablesalt13 Contacting every MEP from every country and remember, what was approved was the 1.0, is only temporal, we can still fight against the permanent version

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@FlaskPost2024 @AlexandraIvanov Ja, Liberalerna röstade nej till Chat Control i EU-parlamentet i juli

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@SME_kvici_ASNB @POLITICOEurope It was the parties from the center. The Left and the Greens voted against Chat Control

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@Greek_Dandy @ricardogorski It didn't, it was the 1.0

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@falkonsnow @ricardogorski The 2.0 didn't pass yet, it's still on negotiations. The ones who passed is the 1.0

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@dragonux08 It didn't, the trilogue negotiation is the day 29th

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@PangeaVPN @nym The age verification has been rejected in the ongoing negotiations, the same with any kind of scanning of e2e apps, but still allows mass scanning on the rest of apps

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@ricardogorski Chat Control 2.0 hasn't passed yet, the next trilogue negotiation will be on September 29th, if you want to fight against mass scanning then it's better to contact the rapporteurs and the permanent representatives of your country in Brussels, besides the ministers of your country

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@PangeaVPN @nym I think the UK's OSA also mandates scanning of private communications, at least the non encrypted ones and is searching ways to mandate scanning on e2e apps in the future

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@Sprudel74 @bitterlemmer @spdde + doch die Schuld für die Rückkehr der Chatkontrolle 1.0 liegt bei der EVP-Fraktion und dem Rest der S&D-Fraktion.

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@Sprudel74 @bitterlemmer @spdde Zumindest die Mehrheit der SPD-Abgeordneten lehnt die Chatkontrolle ab; alle Mitglieder der EVP-Fraktion haben für diese Kontrolle gestimmt und sich zudem sowohl im Europäischen Rat als auch auf nationaler Ebene für diesen Vorschlag eingesetzt. Man kann der SPD vieles vorwerfen,+

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@welchering @keypousttchi Was halten Sie von Chatkontrolle 1.0 und Chatkontrolle 2.0?

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@seb_locke_ @AlastairMorgan @UKLabour I'm European and I hate Chat Control, but don't forget that the UK has the OSA, it's basically a mix between Chat Control and the DSA. If I'm not wrong the OSA also mandates the scanning of private communications and they are searching for a method to scan on encrypted apps

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@RealDarlanio @andreas_kuhne If Centerpartiet is against Chat Control, why did the MEPs of that party voted in favour of Chat Control 1.0?

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@SemisatiricalUA @BoudreauRWBlue @pipist0rm @Polymarket Well, about Chat Control, the state members wants the scanning to not require a court order, allowing the platforms to scan every conversation of everyone, even without the need of prior suspicion

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@Ericson_ubbhult @NeighborThrax @moderaterna + proportionerligt, så jag ser inga skäl att åter godkänna undantaget eller göra det permanent. Massövervakning skyddar inte minderåriga; det som verkligen skyddar minderåriga är riskbegränsande åtgärder.

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@Ericson_ubbhult @NeighborThrax @moderaterna Debatten om Chat Control är fortfarande aktuell eftersom frågan har tagits upp igen. Övervakningen bör endast riktas mot personer som redan är misstänkta och alltid ske med stöd av en domstolsorder. Efter fem år har Europeiska kommissionen inte kunnat bevisa att undantaget är+

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@iDealzer @JoanaCotar @Tarek_Muller Wir haben noch eine Chance, die Chatkontrolle zu stoppen. Was beschlossen wurde, war eine vorübergehende Aufhebung (Chatkontrolle 1.0), wir haben weiterhin die Möglichkeit, Massenscans im Dauergesetz zu vermeiden

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@SatinelSystem + más en mitigaciones de riesgo para evitar que se pueda dar la situación en el que un menor pueda ser contactado por un desconocido. En mi opinión eso ayudaría más que el escaneo masivo ya que no se pudo demostrar su proporcionalidad después de cinco años.

[Digol @Digol1604401]

@SatinelSystem +las herramientas IA. Si el resultado final acaba siendo algo más amplio de lo que dije acabaría dañando la privacidad de las personas de sobremanera y posiblemente sería desafiado en el TJEU, donde no es seguro que sobreviva. En vez de escaneo masivo opino que debería centrarse+