dillzilla99

Nothing to put here

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@Avazoey_ No, it's because most people are pretty indifferent to men at best and act as if they are a burden for existing in most cases so the moment someone doesn't act that way it gets interpreted as that person liking them.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@MarieIsabellaB @MikeOxlongOG88 You're the fastest because you are blocking everyone else.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@ysroot @themishra4402 The problem is that this is only true because people accept this premise.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@lowcountryev @TeslaPatriot It wouldn't have crashed if the driver was driving instead of it. The only reason why it crashed is because the owner accepted the premise of the car being "full self driving" and not particularly self driving.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@GameAnim Stop accepting the premise of assholes. This works fundamentally different from how AI works and accepting that terminology is the reason the rules are murky.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@Edward63561584 @TeslaPatriot Are you suggesting Texas is not a first world state?

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@lowcountryev @TeslaPatriot If it worked everywhere it wouldn't have crashed.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@KevoModesto @samischwalen @JRT228 @evan_doji Now you are trying to switch the argument to San Antonio when the whole point was that you can't get anything affordable unless it's in an extreme ghetto.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@KevoModesto @samischwalen @JRT228 @evan_doji No, that is the point. That's the entire point. You said Tulsa. Tulsa and San Antonio are not remotely the same thing. Tulsa is cheap only because people appropriately view it as a threat to their own health and safety to live there.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@lowcountryev @TeslaPatriot If you replace "full self driving" with "supervised self driving" then fine but having it called "full self driving" then the CEO brag about how you don't even need a driver on a regular basis, that's my issue. The messaging is very double speak.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@Edward63561584 @TeslaPatriot They are literally in Texas when the Express lanes are closed.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@KevoModesto @samischwalen @JRT228 @evan_doji San Antonio is not at all affordable

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@GregOwen70 @TeslaPatriot According to the law boneless wings aren't boneless and wings doesn't actually mean wings. The law is not always correct.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@lowcountryev @TeslaPatriot You shouldn't have to supervise something called "full self driving". The very suggestion implies that it is in fact not fully self driving.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@bowhuntr09 @TeslaPatriot "full self driving"

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@PTrubey @TeslaPatriot If it is supervised then it needs to not be called full self driving.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@GregOwen70 @TeslaPatriot This is BS double speak. You can't say your program is fully self driving then say that the driver must be liable for what the car is claimed to be fully capable of doing. The only reason this gets a pass is because these companies lobby to make rules against the public will.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@KevoModesto @samischwalen @JRT228 @evan_doji The risk of both of those things combined is lower than the violent crime rate in the cities you suggested. That's also ignoring that the accident rates also tend to follow high crime rates.

[dillzilla99 @dillzilla11]

@KevoModesto @samischwalen @JRT228 @evan_doji What's dishonest is suggesting it is unreasonable for people to not want to have a high risk of death or injury just to have a place to live.