Colin Cowherd goes OFF on the WNBA’s Caitlin Clark snub:
“They dropped a commemorative poster for 30 years of the WNBA. Caitlin Clark isn’t on it… but Paige Bueckers and Angel Reese are.
When she entered the league, they had to move her road games to bigger arenas just to fit her fans. She upgraded the WNBA from Southwest back rows to private jets.
Yet she’s left off the 30-year anniversary poster?
It’s either incompetence or intentional. Both are embarrassing.”
Trump says he’s working on national reciprocity.
Carry in all 50 states.
And this is about to expose a lot of people.
Because if your driver’s license works when you cross state lines…
Why shouldn’t your carry permit?
If you’re trusted to protect your life in Texas, why does that right disappear the second you land in New York, California, or New Jersey?
An imaginary line on a map should not erase your right to defend yourself.
And this is where the “I support the Second Amendment, but…” crowd always tells on themselves.
Because national reciprocity is the easy one.
This isn’t even the AR-15 fight.
This isn’t the magazine fight.
This is just saying:
If you went through the process, got licensed, and followed the law, your permit should be recognized nationwide.
That is actual common sense.
So watch who fights this.
Because the people who oppose national reciprocity were never defending the Second Amendment.
They were defending control.
Now be honest:
Should your carry permit work in all 50 states like your driver’s license?
Or should every state get to decide whether your right to protect yourself disappears at the border?
Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still says, “I support the 2A, but…”
Fully support this. Japan and America are the geopolitical equivalent of 2 guys that got into a fight and then became best friends. Germany has a military, none bats an eye. Zero reason Japan shouldn’t also.
Bill Maher to JD Vance: "I’m just glad you're talking to me, you know? I say it every time, the Republicans come here and they take their beating like a man. It’s the people I vote for, they’re the ones who won't talk to me! That’s odd, isn’t it?"
The Left demands absolute obedience to the Supreme Court when it benefits them, but once a ruling comes out to protect our borders, suddenly, a bunch of leftist NGOs come out of the woodwork to subvert it.
Go ahead, Mamdani. Make NYC even more of a sanctuary city. Set up your "solidarity" hotline and forget what "temporary status" means. Maybe the federal government should remind you by temporarily pausing all federal funding of your city.
A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment.
Good win.
But that’s not even the biggest part.
The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years.
Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories.
Not arms.
Not protected.
Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle.
But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said:
No.
If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment.
That creates a problem.
A big one.
Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions.
That’s called a circuit split.
And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in.
So this isn’t just about suppressors.
This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep.
Now be honest:
Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment?
Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them?
Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.