Barry

Seminarian
Detroit, Michigan

[Barry @district_d40688]

@AlyssonBrvno Okay. Just don't spread lies about a Doctor of the Church, one of the mayors.

[Barry @district_d40688]

@BaxterWilliams_ Full consent and full knowledge regarding the formalization of the moral act, not regarding its intensity. These are completely different things. A reading of Saint Alphonsus and his difficulty would resolve it, but you prefer to complicate things arbitrarily

[Barry @district_d40688]

@BaxterWilliams_ What you say about the ancient philosophers is also mistaken. No one desires evil insofar as it is evil, but rather insofar as it is apprehended by the intellect as having some aspect of goodness, whether through a displacement of the good, an obscuring of the intellect...

[Barry @district_d40688]

@BaxterWilliams_ This is why you will never be catholic: because you attack not the Catholic Church, but what you think it is. No moralist demands full knowledge and full conviction (that is almost impossible for men), but sufficient knowledge and sufficient conviction

[Barry @district_d40688]

@Thomisticae Another funny thing is when they call their theologians "scholastic." They definitely don't know what that term means. They probably think a scholastic is someone who divides topics into disputes and questions

[Barry @district_d40688]

@Thomisticae When they don't quote, they copy. There is ample evidence of this, including in those subjects they claim to always be superior (exegesis). Protestants are pathetic

[Barry @district_d40688]

@Eschlastic This is what happens when a young person starts studying Theology while they are still ignorant and sinful: first, they become a protestant; then, a liberal.

[Barry @district_d40688]

@caJosue0060 @ChrisRojas4081 @sincead33 You've got everything mixed up. I'll stop here. I've wasted my time

[Barry @district_d40688]

@caJosue0060 @ChrisRojas4081 @sincead33 In your thesis, you wouldn't be able to adhere to Christ unless you defend a direct intuition of the truth

[Barry @district_d40688]

@caJosue0060 @ChrisRojas4081 @sincead33 Do you deny the inclusion of abductions in Scripture as a moral necessity? Answer me, I want to see the level of your ignorance

[Barry @district_d40688]

@caJosue0060 @ChrisRojas4081 @sincead33 You need to prove that the most probable cannot move the intellect to an agreement and that, due to its relationship with negation, affirmation is not preferable. Good luck. All epistemologists, including modern ones, condemn you

[Barry @district_d40688]

@caJosue0060 @ChrisRojas4081 @sincead33 It's not merely logical credibility. There's a distinction between reasonableness and factual probability

[Barry @district_d40688]

@caJosue0060 @ChrisRojas4081 @sincead33 Not in the same genre of demonstration or proof. That's the basics of Logic. If you know nothing about Logic, why do you want to talk about Theology? Are you trying to emulate Gerhard? lol

[Barry @district_d40688]

@Thomisticae I await you at the Society of Jesus. We need help to rebuild it.

[Barry @district_d40688]

@Thomisticae Astro, I'm a suarezian. I confess I've been annoyed by your somewhat bitter opinions on middle knowledge, but from now on, everything's fine: you've done a service to Doctor Eximius