There’s been a lot of talk in this race about what makes a "real man."
A man does what’s right when no one is watching. He upholds his commitments to his family and neighbors. He doesn’t lie, cheat, & steal his way through life.
Real men serve others. Weak men serve themselves.
You caught them. Mom and Dad were going to sell bibles and cell phones, golden sneakers, and NFTs, Chinese watches and cologne but wouldn’t you know someone beat them to the punch. They were left with only one choice write two books like every former First Lady and President has done in modern history.
Following yesterday's NMIOTC content with the adjacent use case.
The architectural property that makes QSDP (QuStream Defense Protocol) hold command authority through Russian EW jamming is the same property that makes QSSP (QuStream Satellite Protocol) keep satellite calls connected through poor signal.
No handshake to break. Single-use keys derived locally instead of negotiated across the link. Calls that connect on the first scrap of signal, hold through dropouts, and deliver where current phones show "no service."
Viasat. Inmarsat. Thuraya. Iridium. Starlink Direct-to-Cell. Pass-through and regenerative satellite networks, made resilient at the software layer only. No new satellites, no hardware refresh.
The defense case is dramatic. The satellite phone case is commercially scalable. Same technology, two operational gaps.
https://t.co/JdBBfw4Jah
Today, Adrian Neal is presenting QSDP (QuStream Defence Protocol) at the NMIOTC NATO conference in Crete.
The data: every major encryption approach run through the same combined attack profile (packet loss, bit errors, burst jamming, reordering applied together). The kind of contested environment Western drones are actually losing C2 in.
QSDP holds command authority across the sweep. ML-KEM, the NIST #PQC standard, delivers 0% because its handshake can't complete under packet loss. AES-GCM degrades to near-zero. ECDH dies. QSDP is the only line that stays up.
The threat model isn't theoretical. Zhitel, Pole-21, and Krasukha are actual Russian EW systems currently operating in Ukraine. Western tactical encryption breaks against them. Post-quantum encryption doesn't help if the handshake never completes.
The audience today: military officers and procurement from NATO maritime command, JFCNF, and member-state defense bodies. They're not in the room because quantum computers might exist sometime between 2029-2035. They're in the room because drone warfare is the present, signal denial is operational reality, and resilient communications during contested operations is something they need answers for this year.
Explore the data yourself: https://t.co/miNlJqoMJc
Project market cap: $ 2.74m.
Isn’t it hypocritical to take a few Bible verses on sexuality and demand they be legislated over an entire country, while reducing over 2000 verses about wealth, care for the poor, the disabled, the vulnerable, and refugees to a private personal choice?
I will soon be introducing a bill to give the public a 50% ownership stake in the largest AI companies in America.
This would guarantee that the trillions created by AI are used to improve the lives of all of us — and block oligarch decisions that harm the American people.
Every major chain team should be looking at this.
Not because crypto breaks tomorrow.
Because the migration problem is bigger than most people want to admit.
$BTC, $ETH, $SOL and the rest need a realistic protection path before quantum becomes an operational deadline.
QuStream may be the protection layer crypto did not know it needed yet.
@theboogier@phhusson@lorahmoe For someone who doesn't know about open container law, there was not enough information to make it clear that open containers are against the law.
@QweefOnMaBeef@waziot In the video editor "choose from a bunch of transitions to join these clips" sense it's not a transition, but in film, it's a transition.
@theboogier@phhusson@lorahmoe They already made it clear they aren't from the US and aren't familiar with our customs.
Maybe you should have read better.
@MichaelC92893@EntropyRulesAll@JOKAQARMY1 Wow, so you can just decide what I believe and then say I'm too far gone because of what (you decided) I believe.
You don't even need another person for that kind of conversation. Very efficient.