A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.
Okay, time to explain guns to our new friends.
Every day, when I leave the house, I attach a holstered handgun to my belt, under my shirt or coat.
I would no more leave the house without a gun than I would walk around outdoors without shoes.
Is it because I "need" a gun?
No.
I live in rural Tennessee, which is state in the American south. It's very safe here. The dangerous parts of America are big cities where the local government is leftist, and they shelter illegal migrant from the third world, and won't send violent criminals to prison. Places like Chicago and New York City.
Yet, any time I leave the house, I put on a gun, knowing that I will probably never have to use it, and if I do, it will probably be on an aggressive stray dog, not a human.
So why do I do it?
Why do many other people who live around me do it?
Why do we do this so much that carrying a gun is considered totally normal? If someone spotted it, it would not even arouse a comment, much less any fear.
In fact, it is legal to carry a gun openly here, without covering it up. Covering it up is just considered polite.
So.... why?
Well, try thinking of an English nobleman, during the reign of Elizabeth the First. When he dressed to go ride to court, he would hang a slender fencing sword, called a rapier or smallsword, from his belt.
He didn't expect to be attacked.
He didn't even expect to fight a duel. And if he was challenged to a duel, he wouldn't need his sword right then. He would meet his challenger later at an agreed-upon place and time.
No, he wore his sword because it was an expression of who he was. He was a gentleman, a person of status, with the legal privilege of carrying a sword.
By carrying a sword, he asserted his rights and prerogatives as a nobleman.
In Japan, you had the same sort of thing happening. The samurai, members of the bushi class, wore the two swords not because they expected to be attacked at any moment, but because the two swords were an essential part of who he was.
So, in these two cases, weapons were carried by noblemen as an assertion of status. They had the right to do so, and they did so in order to assert, exercise, and retain the right.
Americans carry guns because every American citizen is a nobleman.
When we fought the British for our independence, that war began on April 19th, 1775, when British troops, fearing American rebelliousness, marched out from Boston to confiscate guns from people living in the surrounding countryside.
Our ancestors did not submit to this. We shot them instead, and they fled back to Boston with their tails between their legs, to cower under the cover of the guns from the warship HMS Sommerset.
Thus began several years of war.
And when we won that war, we made a country where no government, and no man, would ever be allowed to disarm the people.
No agent of the government may say to us, "I may have a gun, and you may not."
Because to say that is to say "I am a nobleman, and you are a peasant. I am a master, and you are a slave."
We are not peasants here. We are all noblemen. That is the most basic principle of what it means to be an American.
I can be impoverished, so I can to be so poor that I live in a van down by the river. But however reduced my circumstances, as an American, I still have the rights and freedoms of a nobleman, of a daimyo, because that is the basic founding idea of the nation we forged on that day.
If you come to America to visit, if you walk among us, you will pass many people carrying guns. You will not notice this. You will not see them. You will witness no violence. Everything will be normal. But the guns will be there.
Because that is who we are.
We don't carry guns to be violent. We don't wish to be rude, or to intimidate people. We keep our guns covered up.
But they are the deepest, most essential part of what it means to be American.
Islam did this to Iran.
Islam did this to Lebanon.
Islam did this to Egypt.
Islam did this to Syria.
Islam did this to Iraq.
Islam did this to Yemen.
Islam did this to Libya and Sudan and Nigeria and Chad and Algeria and pretty much every country it touched.
Islam did this to the Jewish people in Israel too. The difference is that the Jewish people decolonized Israel and freed it from Islamic oppression.
And Israel is thriving because of it. That why it’s so imperative that the world now helps the Iranian people to be free.
By freeing Iran of its Islamic oppressors, you don’t just free Iran and its people. You also free Lebanon and Syria and all the countries ruined and influenced by the Islamic regime.
Before you blackpill on Trump-Vance, consider the last 25 years:
> America was “ok” relatively speaking when George W Bush took over
> 9/11 birthed a disastrous expansion of the deep state regime
> Then we get a total market collapse (from Bill Clinton proto-DEI policies uncorrected)
> This sets stage for Obama
> Obama wins, takes us HARD LEFT for 8 years
> Sows seeds of everything we are experiencing
> Hillary Clinton set to inherit Obama trajectory and pour gasoline on fire
> Trump descends from Olympus on the golden escalator like a protean god from a former era of American nationalism and greatness
> Obama and Clinton are so scared of Trump disrupting their new world order plans they turn the FBI against his campaign, set stage for “Russian Collusion” narrative
> Trump still beats Clinton, doesn’t expect to, isn’t ready, walks into office having no idea what he’s up against and what’s been set in motion
> Gets undercut at every turn by disloyal Rs and deep state thugs in first term
> Still, Trump is such a threat that they run vegetable Biden against him in 2020 and engineer a global pandemic to provide cover for stealing election
> Trump STILL wins but they steal it, engineer J6 to cover it up the steal
> Now we get four years of Biden puppet with Obama team pulling strings
> Makes things 10x worse than we could ever imagine, flood country with illegals, raid treasury for ethnic and DEI interest groups, let world burn, entrench deep state further, prosecute Trump, all his allies
> Trump runs again, they try to assassinate him, he survives
> Biden is literally dying in office, they want to run him again anyway, but he short circuits on national TV
> Swap in Kamala and Walz, literal nightmare scenario for America
> Trump WINS FOR THE THIRD TIME IN A ROW
> Now when Trump takes office in 2025 things are FAR worse than they were 8 years, both because he never really got a first term and Biden era was the most disastrous 4 years for America in modern history
> Trump has way better team, way better VP, way better instincts than 8 years ago
> It’s only been one year
> You cannot overestimate how bad things have gotten
> You should not black pill because this is truly an amazing, providential stoppage of the total destruction of the U.S.
> It could be SO MUCH worse
> Then Charlie Kirk gets assassinated and the Right goes idiotic
> Still, we need to let Trump and Vance do work, let Vance set the stage for next 8 years, and be grateful
> If it wasn’t for Trump, we would be in the gulags
> We are not
> And we still have 3 more years of Trump
When you pull the historical camera out, it’s amazing America is still what it is in 2026. The entire century thus far has been pushing for total American destruction. And the only political figure in the last 25 YEARS to stall it, stop it, do anything to reverse it, is Donald J Trump.
Imagine being ungrateful for that. Imagine counting Vance out already. Couldn’t be me.
I always say Israel is losing the PR war, but have a read at this...…….
Mitch Schneider
October 10 at 12:09 PM
“I keep hearing that Israel "lost the PR war."
And you know what? Fine. Sure. Whatever.
The world thinks we're monsters. The UN passed over 30 resolutions condemning us. College campuses exploded with protests. "Genocide" trended on Twitter for 700 days straight.
We lost the PR war. Congratulations to everyone who won it.
Now let me tell you what we won instead.
Two years ago, my country was surrounded. Hezbollah had 150,000 rockets aimed at us from the north. Hamas controlled Gaza with an army in tunnels beneath it. Iran was months from a nuclear weapon. The Houthis were firing missiles at our ships. Assad's Syria was an Iranian highway. Iraqi militias were itching for war.
We called it the "ring of fire." Iran spent 40 years building it.
Billions of dollars. Endless weapons. Thousands of fighters. All of it designed for one purpose: to destroy Israel in a coordinated attack.
October 7th was supposed to be the beginning. Hamas attacks from the south, Hezbollah from the north, militias from the east, Houthis from the sea. The final war.
You know what happened instead?
Israel dismantled the entire thing. Piece by piece. Threat by threat.
Not in some distant future. Not "eventually." In two years.
Nasrallah spent 32 years building Hezbollah into the most powerful non-state military in the world. Israel killed him in his bunker and took out his entire command structure in weeks.
Hezbollah isn't weakened. It's finished.
Iran built a nuclear program for decades. Israel set it back years. Killed their top scientists. Destroyed their facilities. Made the regime so weak that its own people are revolting.
Assad survived a civil war, Russian intervention, and American strikes. He couldn't survive losing his Iranian backers. His regime collapsed. The land bridge is gone.
The Houthis thought they could close the Red Sea. Israel crippled their long-range capabilities and neutralized the threat.
Hamas? Sinwar died in rubble clutching a stick. Haniyeh was eliminated in Tehran. Deif is gone. The tunnels are destroyed. And this week, Hamas agreed to a ceasefire and the release of all hostages.
Read that again. The terrorist organization that started this war by massacring 1,200 people just agreed to release every hostage and accept a ceasefire on Israel's terms.
So yeah. We lost the PR war. I'll take that loss.
Because here's what we gained:
My kids don't have to run to bomb shelters anymore. The north is being rebuilt. Hezbollah's rockets are gone. Iran's nuclear threat has been pushed back years. The tunnels under Gaza are rubble. The "ring of fire" is extinguished.
And now? The hostages are coming home. There's a ceasefire. The fighting can finally end.
Two years ago, we were facing an existential threat. Today, we're the dominant power in the Middle East.
Here's the thing about the "PR war" - it's a luxury. It's what people with security worry about. It's optics. It's perception. It's whether someone with a blue checkmark likes you.
Israel doesn't have that luxury. We never did.
When people scream "genocide," we're preventing one. When they cry "disproportionate," we're stopping rockets. When they demand "ceasefire," we're rescuing hostages.
While the world was busy judging us, we were busy surviving.
And not just surviving. Winning. Fundamentally, decisively, historically winning.
Iran's 40-year plan to surround and destroy Israel? Over. The axis of resistance? Shattered. The greatest coordinated threat in our history? Defeated.
So let me ask you something:
Would you rather win the PR war and lose your country? Or lose the PR war and secure your existence for the next 50 years?
Because that's the actual choice.
And Israel made it. Again.
The world can have its hashtags. We'll take our sovereignty.
They can have their protests. We'll take our security.
Saying "Israel needs better PR" is like saying the Jewish people need better PR.
No one says the latter, because it’s absurd to think two millennia of obsessive, shape-shifting hatred can be massaged with slick messaging.
Yes, some states have “great PR.”
Qatar buys their good PR: paying off journalists and influencers, plastering ads across foreign networks, bribing FIFA, and running one of the world’s largest media organizations.
China prevents their bad PR: it censors the internet, arrests critics, intimidates reporters and manipulates the TikTok algorithm do eliminate China criticism, while amplifying Western sins (especially American and Israeli ones).
France and Britain pretend their state-owned broadcasters are neutral, but France 24, TV5Monde, and the BBC World Service are lineal descendants of their empires, built to beam Paris and London’s worldview to former colonial subjects.
They may criticize their governments, but never in ways that delegitimize the nation itself. And they wouldn’t platform IRA justifications as equal to Downing Street.
And that’s not all. The smaller players such as Turkey’s TRT World, Russia’s RT, and Saudi Arabia’s Al Arabiya each reach hundreds of millions across dozens of countries. What small, ancient minority population do you think they’re focused on?
Israel doesn’t buy journalists, it doesn’t muzzle the internet, doesn’t sponsor sports team, and it doesn’t own even a small global broadcast arm.
Instead it hosts more foreign correspondents than any almost any other. They are not here to write about archaeology or technology, nor to enjoy the cuisine and culture. They are here as hall monitors of the Jewish state, recording every misstep to show their readers back home that the Jews should no longer be pitied.
Put the world’s biggest magnifying glass over any society, stir in enemy states eager to stoke strife, add foreign state-owned media without enough material for their 24/7 news channels and you get a vicious cycle of “negative PR.”
Add in the hundreds of millions around the world who think they understand Israel because they watch Al Jazeera or the BBC, hand them anonymous social media accounts, and you could see how one might describe this as an “uphill battle” for a nation of 10M.
Thus Israel’s gay rights and pride parades are dismissed as “pinkwashing.” Its tech ingenuity is branded as surveillance and international crime. Its award-winning cuisine is derided as appropriation.
Israel's respect for religion and tradition is recast as apartheid. Its culture of national service is condemned as militarism. It’s defense against terror and rocket fire is libeled as “genocide.” And its citizens speaking up in defense of their state are reduced to “hasbara propagandists.”
No diverse democracy could withstand that scrutiny, let alone one whose people have long been accused of the worst crimes imaginable (deicide to slavery and from apartheid to genocide) .
And no serious country would orient its entire policy or national defense to appease hostile foreign audiences.
If you applied the same magnifying glass to the U.S., you’d see a nation of metal detectors in schools, prisons overflowing with minorities, bankruptcies from medical bills, a standard of living that hinges on illegal immigration, sports franchises doubling as universities, and a society obese, over medicated and suffering some form of addiction(real or imaginary).
Does that sum up America? That is how selective reporting works.
Israel doesn’t have a PR problem.
The world has an Israel problem.
I’m tired of the lies we tell ourselves. Our leaders cry every day about “the occupation” as if history began in 1948, as if Israel is some unique monster in human history. But let me remind you of something that no one dares to speak out loud: we Arabs are the children of the biggest and longest occupation the Middle East and Africa have ever seen.
In the 7th and 8th centuries, Arab tribes burst out of the Arabian Peninsula. Within just a few decades, they crushed the Byzantine Empire in Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt. They destroyed the Persian Empire. They swept across North Africa, reaching all the way to Morocco, Spain, and even southern France. At its height, the Arab Caliphate ruled 13 million square kilometers - larger than Rome ever dreamed of. Millions of Persians, Berbers, Copts, Arameans, Jews, Greeks, and others suddenly found themselves under Arab rule. Their languages and faiths were pushed aside. Coptic faded in Egypt. Aramaic nearly died out. Even Persian was nearly erased until poets like Ferdowsi fought to keep it alive. Arabic became the dominant tongue, Islam the dominant faith. That was not liberation - it was occupation on a scale that reshaped entire continents.
The Mongols came and went in about a century.
The Romans ruled for centuries, but Latin disappeared from the Middle East.
The British Empire held sway for 200 years, then collapsed.
The Arab-Muslim conquests? It changed the identity of entire nations forever.
Think about it: Egypt was Christian and Coptic-speaking for 600 years before the Arabs came. Today it is Arab and Muslim. North Africa was Berber and Roman. Today it is Arab and Muslim. The Levant spoke Greek and Aramaic. Today it speaks Arabic. Even Spain lived under Arab rule for 700 years. That is not just an “occupation” - that is a civilizational overhaul.
And yet, in 2025, our leaders - who are themselves the product of this massive Arab occupation, weep about Israel, a sliver of land the size of New Jersey, calling it “the worst occupation.” Really? Compared to what the Arabs did to North Africa, Persia, and the Levant? Compared to the centuries-long Arab rule that erased identities, forced conversions, and remade entire regions?
If we, Palestinians, want honesty, we must stop pretending that Israel invented occupation. The truth is bitter: we live in the shadow of the largest and longest Arab occupation in history. Blaming only Israel while worshiping our corrupt leaders who exploit this narrative is not justice, it’s cowardice.
History matters. And if we don’t face it, we will remain slaves not to Israel, but to our own hypocrisy.
Battlefield 1 was the beginning of the end, it’s the sole reason the franchise started going in the wrong direction - people loved BF1 for all the wrong reasons.
When @DineshDSouza appeared on the Alex Jones podcast yesterday, he said something few are willing to admit: Israel has every legitimate claim to the land it inhabits. This is not a political talking point or a matter of opinion; it’s a fact based on universal principles that define how peoples claim their land throughout history.
For thousands of years the right to land has rested on a few foundational principles:
𝟏 - 🏠 Inheritance - When people trace their roots and ownership of the land back through generations.
𝟐 - 🌿 Indigeneity - When people are the original, native inhabitants of the land, with cultural, spiritual, and historical continuity.
𝟑 - ⚔️ Conquest through war - When a land is taken and held through victory in battle.
𝟒 - 📜 Legal acquisition - When people acquire land through formal purchases, treaties, or international recognition.
While Dinesh articulated it masterfully, let’s break down and expand on these four pillars—ancestral, indigenous, military, and legal—and show why Israel’s right to the land is not just legitimate, but unmatched.
➤ 🏠 Inheritance: The Bloodline of the Land
The Jews have a documented, unbroken ancestral claim to the Land of Israel that predates almost every modern civilization. This isn’t based on vague tradition, it’s supported by history, archaeology, scripture, and an uninterrupted chain of memory. The Jewish people built kingdoms there, ruled and were exiled, returned and rebuilt, destroyed and prayed for return again, all centered around Jerusalem, Hebron, Shechem, and Tiberias.
Even in exile, Jews never spiritually or emotionally detached from the land. For 2,000 years they said “Next year in Jerusalem.” Jewish law, holidays, and rituals all revolve around the geography and agriculture of Israel.
Jews didn’t discover this land; this land was and always has been their home. The exile was the interruption. Their return was the continuation.
If inheritance means anything, if having something and losing it through persecution doesn’t erase your ownership, then the Jewish claim to Israel is undeniable.
➤🌿Indigeneity: The Native People of the Land of Zion
If the modern world wants to elevate the importance of indigenous identity, then it must apply that value universally. And when it does, one thing becomes obvious: the Jews are the indigenous people of the Land of Israel.
Indigenous status is not measured by population size or current borders but by cultural and historical roots. The Jews lived in the Land of Israel before the Arabs ever arrived. Hebrew is one of the oldest living languages on earth, still spoken. Jewish texts are filled with place names, rivers, and mountain ranges of Israel. Our laws, festivals, and worldview were shaped by this land, not borrowed or adopted from outside.
Most importantly, there has never been a single year in recorded history when there were zero Jews living in the Land of Israel. Even during the most difficult times of exile, persecution, and dispersion, a Jewish presence remained continuous and unbroken within the land itself. This undeniable fact proves the deep-rooted connection of the Jewish people to Israel.
Few peoples have a 3,000-year-old connection to this land that is so tangible, physical, and present. To say Jews are “colonizers” in Judea is to spit in the face of every definition of indigeneity. It’s dishonest and historically absurd.
➤ ⚔️Conquest and Victory: The Hard Truth of History
This is the part of the conversation most people shy away from—but D’Souza was right to say it plainly. In the real world, throughout all of history, force matters. The right to land was more often than not been established through war. Every border in Europe, every capital city, every state line on the globe was either won in battle or defended by strength.
The United States itself is a prime example of how force and conquest shape the map. From the Revolutionary War that secured independence from Britain to the Mexican-American War, which added vast territories like California and Texas, America’s borders were largely defined by military victories and negotiations won at the end of conflicts. The Louisiana Purchase, while a legal land deal, was also backed by the power to defend and control the new territory. Native American lands were taken through a combination of force and displacement. The U.S. story underscores a universal fact: power and the ability to defend land are the ultimate guarantees of sovereignty and survival. No country on earth, including the United States, became what it is today without war and conquest playing a decisive role.
And Israel is no different.
In 1948, the Jews declared independence and were immediately attacked by five Arab armies. They didn’t ask for war, but they won it. Again in 1967, surrounded and threatened with annihilation, they struck preemptively and gained Judea, Samaria, the Golan Heights, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. In 1973, on Yom Kippur, they were caught off guard and still held their ground.
But somehow, the world decided that every other country can keep what it wins in war but not the Jews.
And if we are already discussing war and power, let’s be brutally honest: Power doesn’t just defend legitimacy. Power is legitimacy itself. A people who cannot defend their home will lose it. Always. The Jews learned that the hard way, when they were scattered, unarmed, persecuted, and murdered for centuries. But not anymore.
Today, Israel has an army. It has nuclear weapons. It has air power. It has intelligence. And for the first time in two thousand years, Jews don’t need to explain why they deserve to live.
They have the strength to survive. And that alone, in this world, is a right no one can deny.
➤ 📜Legal Acquisition: The Diplomatic Record Is Clear
Even if one chooses to ignore history, culture, war and force, the legal record is still in Israel’s favor. Under the Ottoman rule, Jews, through organizations like the Jewish National Fund, legally purchased vast amount of land, such as in the Jezreel Valley, transforming barren land into thriving communities. Under the British Mandate, they continued to buy land and establish settlements. In 1922, the League of Nations formally recognized the Jewish right to reconstitute their national home in Palestine. The United Nations voted in 1947 to partition the land and establish a Jewish state alongside an Arab one. The Jews accepted. The Arabs rejected it and went to war.
In every international system that existed at the time, Israel followed the rules. It wasn’t a colonial imposition. It wasn’t theft. It was legal, ratified, internationally recognized self-determination.
And that legitimacy has only grown. Peace with Egypt. Peace with Jordan. The Abraham Accords with the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco. Dozens of countries trading and cooperating with Israel. You don’t make peace with a thief—you make peace with a sovereign.
No Apologies, No Permission Needed
The real discomfort people have with Israel isn’t about settlements, borders, or even religion. It’s about the fact that Jews are no longer weak. That they no longer beg for survival. That they have taken their fate into their own hands—and they’re winning.
People are fine with Jews as victims. They’re disturbed by Jews who fight back. But history doesn’t wait for permission. And survival doesn’t ask for applause.
Israel doesn’t owe anyone an explanation. Not for being born, not for winning wars, not for building a nation. The Jews have every single classic and moral claim to the land of Israel: inherited, indigenous, earned in war, and secured in law.
No other people on earth holds all four.
And if that makes some people uncomfortable—so be it. Jews didn’t come back to their land to make the world comfortable.
They came back to make sure they’d never be powerless again.
When Candace Owens and others like her urge Christians to turn against the Jews over a few vague or disputed rabbinic references to Jesus in the Talmud, texts that are not even part of Jewish Scripture, Christians ought to pause and ask:
What should Jews think of us?
Unlike a handful of ambiguous lines buried in the Talmud, the Church Fathers and Protestant reformers weren’t vague, they were vicious.
Their words weren’t confined to ink and scrolls, they ignited centuries of bloodshed. They fueled pogroms, expulsions, forced conversions, and centuries of Christian-perpetrated bloodshed against the Jews.
Take John Chrysostom, one of the revered Doctors of the Church:
“The synagogue is not only a brothel and a theatre; it is also a den of robbers and a lodging for wild beasts… They worship the Devil.”
— Homily 1, Adversus Judaeos
“God hates them… It is incumbent upon all Christians to hate the Jews.”
— Homily 4
Or Saint Jerome, translator of the Latin Vulgate:
“Jews are cursed because they crucified God.”
— Epistle 112, To Augustine
Or Martin Luther, the father of the Reformation:
“Set fire to their synagogues… their houses should also be razed and destroyed… let us drive them out of the country.”
— On the Jews and Their Lies, 1543
Yet, despite these monstrous declarations from prominent Christian figures, Jews are not rallying their people to hate Christians in return.
They’ve lived through our hypocrisy. They’ve endured our theology turned into violence. And still, they seek partnership and peace with the same faith that historically despised them.
So the next time someone tells you to hate the Jews because of a quote from a rabbi, remember: if anyone had cause to hate, it isn’t you. It's them. And yet, they don’t. That should humble you. Not inflame you.
“Not This!” is the battle cry of those who don’t know what they’re talking about. It’s performative ignorance, too lazy to study the history of war or the operational reality of Gaza (enemy forces, terrain, population, international political context, and all other operational variables). It’s easier to rant than invite real experts to explain what’s driving Israel’s strategy.
The great military strategist Piers Morgan says "the current strategy is failing." That’s not analysis, it’s ignorance. Wars are not judged by feelings. They’re judged by the political objectives of both sides.
Hamas has 3 supporting goals for the war:
1) survive the war and be a celebrated as the great terrorist regime that conducted October 7th and survived Israel's counter attack
2) It wants to maintain military capability to destroy Israel, kill all jews on the planet
3) it wants to stay as the governing power of Gaza subjugating its population, receive billions from the international community for the civilians in Gaza that they divert to achieve #2.
Hamas has achieved none of its goals and has no measurable variables to say its chosen strategy will get it there.
Israel also has 3 supporting goals:
1) Return the hostages.
2) Destroy Hamas as a military and as the governing body of Gaza.
3) Ensure no force in the Gaza Strip is able to threaten Israel again.
Israel has returned 196 of 251 hostages.
Hamas's military has been dismantled. It had 5 brigades, 24 battalions, 30-40k trained fighters, 20,000 rockets, held terrain, could conduct coordinated attacks and defenses. Today, it has none of that. Hamas does not have a military capable of organized operations, it has a guerrilla force made up of untrained, inexperienced, radicalized mostly youths (average age of a Hamas replacement soldier is in the teens) with limited military equipment continuing to use civilians as human shields and human sacrifice. Hamas is losing political control.
Gazans are protesting and speaking out against them. Their political and military leadership is dead. Israel has figured out a way to take their ability to control food distribution that they used as power over the people. Israel is closing in militarily in many directions.
No threat has the ability to leave Gaza to conduct operations against the citizens of Israel.
Israel has also defanged Hezbollah (the crown jewel of the Islamic Regime in Iran) in Lebanon, contributed to the fall of Assad in Syria, destroyed Assad's military arsenal, protect Druze communities in Syria, showed the world Iran was weak, proved its own resolve, restraint, and military superiority while fighting on seven fronts.
Despite what Piers and other ignorant mouthpieces say about Israel's reputation, the U.S. administration (and other nations) and majority of the U.S. population recognize the necessity of Israel's operations against Hamas in Gaza. Despite their feelings, Israel moves towards the complete destruction of Hamas every day.
If October 7 had happened in the U.S., UK, or any NATO nation, the response would have been overwhelming and just. The difference? Israel has fewer tools and more constraints, yet still complies with the laws of war and takes unprecedented precautions to protect civilians.
War is hell. War is death and destruction. Hamas built Gaza for war. It wants civilian deaths to feed its propaganda.
The belief that Hamas could be destroyed bloodlessly is not just naïve—it’s dangerous for the future of all nations.
trump's second term feels more like restarting a game at a save point after losing. it's his first term, played again, and now he knows where all the bosses are waiting and how to exploit their weaknesses. much worse for democrats than if he'd won in 2020.
I talk about Russia Ukraine all the time, and the reason I don’t pick a side in that war is because it’s a fight between two dictators. One of whom is fighting for his pride and expansion to gain more power, and the other who’s fighting because the United States for the past 4 years used him as a money laundering operation.
The war in Ukraine is a military industrial complex slush fund. There’s only one side and it’s the elite vs everyone who’s dying so they can get rich. Neither of those two corrupt fuckin countries is a threat to America, so it’s not my pig and not my farm. However, I hate Ukraine more because they stole more of my fuckin money.
You don’t have to pick a side in either conflict, but if that’s your position, take that position and take it all the way like I do. I have never once rooted for either to “win”. I’ve only wanted them to stop fighting so people stop dying and we stop funding it because we’re already out over 200 billion on this shit.
The war in Israel however costs us nothing, despite what retards on here will tell you. They buy weapons from us, give us military intel on our enemies, and outspend the “aid” we give them to the tune of about 1.5 billion a year. Comparing the two conflicts is a false equivalency. I hope that answers your question.
Just landed in Israel with my family. On the way here, we stopped in France. In the airport, my son yelled, “I’m so excited to go to Israel!” My heart sank.
We got nasty stares, and looks of disgust. It was uncomfortable and sad—it didn’t used to be like that.
As soon as we got to Israel, all of that melted away. The Israeli flags everywhere, waving proud. Israeli soldiers there to protect us. And a booming country fighting multiple wars with one arm tied behind her back.
My son was expecting to walk into a war zone. To his surprise, we feel safer walking on the streets here than anywhere in the world.
It makes me proud that a people rose from the ashes of the Holocaust and built this thriving country. Nobody will ever take it from us again.
It’s so sad to see the ignorant hate this country gets, from people that have never been here before.
I invite all the keyboard warriors who get their information from TikTok to get on a plane and experience the Holy Land for themselves.
God Bless Israel.
Fun fact.
There is a country in Europe called Poland that wants the people there to actually be Polish, speak Polish, adhere to Polish traditions and respect Polish culture and history.
It gives 0 free money to people who aren’t Polish and only wants foreigners who benefit Poland and pay their own way in Polish society.
In hundreds of years time people in that country will all largely be white and Polish and will drink Polish drinks and eat Polish food and celebrate Christmas at Polish Christmas markets free from terror attacks.
Sounds pretty racist.
They should do the opposite of that and be like the multi cultural paradise that is Paris France.
Paris good. Poland bad.