@EFCLyndon It felt today that we were playing to relegate West Ham. First half was dreadful from an attacking perspective. Nothing to play for, yes, but no one to blame but themselves over the last few weeks.
@PED7 Arsenal pushing for a title put on a 16 year old, whose contribution wins the game, while we pay £40million for a teenager to gradually strip away all of his confidence and never get on the pitch.
@EFCLyndon@EFCLyndon I’ve maintained that the Frame rate of the video itself is a major problem. If we assume 30fps and the defender and attacker are running in opposite directions that could be a 64cm variance per frame if both are running at top speed, or 32cm if one is static.
@jay74397972@RobRyanRed They did Yo-yo test yesterday, they were just tired, lacked a bit of spark. Palmer and Ashfield did some good things 1st half, but conceded two sloppy goals. It’s all about fitness at this stage.
@NathSalt1@RichFay Clearly a sledgehammer approach to prevent individuals reselling, or organised touting like Vivid seats. The club need a nuanced approach especially but not limited to the circumstances highlighted, to support fans & community but also to prevent touting the policy aims to stop.
@NathSalt1 Listened to the pod, I think both you and @RichFay missed an important point. The club mentioned a “same seat same person” policy and that “no seats are transferable”. So only named STH can ever attend a game during season, no subs in any circumstance, let alone renewals.