Yes, Africa needs more innovators, inventors, engineers, and technology investors...”
But innovation cannot flourish unless the political and institutional ecosystem protects liberty, rule of law, fair competition, and constitutionalism.
If talent is an output of the brain, then talent is not the bottleneck, because the human brain is the same everywhere, across ethnicity and geography. So what is the real constraint? Societal ecosystems shaped by a society’s values.
Think about this as an illustration:
Are there “Chamisas” out there willing to die on the hill of constitutionalism, domestically within their own micro-parties and nationally? Are they willing to subordinate personal ambition, self-interest, and power to principle?
This is Africa’s deepest question.
Had Chamisa’s personal ambition and desire for unchecked control not vetoed the constitutional aspiration encapsulated in “Citizens First,” then SADC’s electoral indictments of Mnangagwa would have had legs to usher in a new dispensation of liberty for the citizen.
And with that liberty would have presented the opportunity for a generation to start afresh and create the ecosystem that sets the foundation for Zimbabwe’s own Musks and Bezoses to rise.
Some may say, “But Strive...” Well, Strive Masiyiwa is a rare anomaly. He defeated a hostile State ecosystem. Not even Elon Musk could have achieved what Strive achieved, or launched a single rocket, if he were fighting a weaponized State machinery led by Mugabe and his protégés like Mnangagwa.
Where are Africa’s billionaires and tech leaders? While Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos are competing to connect Africa through cutting-edge satellite technology, many of Africa’s wealthiest individuals remain focused on traditional sectors such as mining, banking, telecommunications, real estate, and retail.
The future belongs to those who create technology, not just those who consume it. Africa needs more innovators, inventors, engineers, and technology investors willing to think beyond the next quarterly profit and build for generations.
The insults are the grating part. Calling fellow Africans “idiots” and “foolish” simply for holding a different opinion is condescending and infantilizing. It drowns the signal in message and shuts down discussion.
It’s the same playbook we see at home: label dissent as stupid or treasonous or puppet of the West. The tag then justify silencing it - even imprisoning journalists in the name of “national interest.”
Mukoma, we all want the same thing: a better society. But charity begins at home. Insults are not the best means of communicating perspective, they don’t make converts; they only drown the signal in a tweet.
This is what I was talking about when the war began in Iran, that Africans who are celebrating Donald Trump’s reckless military attacks on Iran together with Israel are idiots. They are foolish. This is exactly what I meant.
When fuel prices go up in South Africa, the cost of everything goes up. Food, furniture, transport, everything has to be moved, and that movement depends on fuel. It does not end there. It is even worse for Zimbabweans, because the trucks that move goods from South Africa into Zimbabwe factor in those increased fuel costs. Whether they are carrying food, equipment, or furniture, you are still going to pay more.
That is how idiotic it is for anyone to celebrate such a reckless war. You are celebrating something that directly makes your own life more expensive.
No mukoma, this reads like misleading political spin.
Yes, Spirit Airlines has ceased operations today (May 2, 2026). But calling it the “first major casualty of the Iran war” due to jet fuel prices under Trump ignores years of deep-rooted problems.
Spirit’s Actual Situation
- Shutdown today: All flights canceled, orderly wind-down after failing to secure a last-minute ~$500M government rescue during its second Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
- Fuel prices played a role: Jet fuel roughly doubled (from ~$2.20–$2.50/gallon pre-war to over $4/gallon) due to the Iran conflict disrupting supplies. This was a painful hit.
- But it was already dying: Massive losses (billions since 2020), crushing debt, operational woes, aircraft issues, and two bankruptcies (2024 and 2025). Not a sudden victim of a war in 2026.
The Merger That Could Have Saved It
- The Biden administration blocked it: DOJ sued to stop JetBlue’s $3.8B acquisition of Spirit in 2023 over antitrust concerns. A federal judge blocked the deal in 2024; it was abandoned. Critics argue this removed Spirit’s best path to survival and consolidation.
- Trump’s position: Trump publicly supported buyers/mergers for Spirit (“I’d love somebody to buy Spirit… maybe the federal government should help”) and floated bailout/takeover options to save jobs. He opposed some bigger mergers (e.g., United-American) but backed help for smaller carriers. A recent rescue deal still fell apart over creditor terms.
Spirit’s core problems: Pandemic and post-COVID demand shifts, labor costs, unsustainable ultra-low-cost model, and legacy debt.
Objectively, these problems predate both the current fuel cost spike and Trump’s presidency. The war accelerated the collapse, but the war was never the root cause.
Objectively, both administrations share responsibility but Biden shoulders more:
- Biden’s team blocked a merger that could have created a stronger #5 competitor against the Big 4 (who dominate ~75-80% of the market).
- Trump’s team couldn’t close a bailout deal much as Trump publicly advocated for it unlike Biden who blocked a deal that could have saved Spirit airlines.
The tweet cherry-picks the fuel angle to blame Trump while ignoring the long documented historic decline. It’s not a purely “Trump’s war killed Spirit” story.
This is the first major casualty of the Iran war, with Spirit Airlines shutting down as jet fuel prices soared.
Spirit Airlines owned roughly 200 aircraft, but due to the sharp rise in fuel costs and existing financial pressures, it has ceased operations. Trump promised Americans an economic renaissance, but he is delivering economic instability and rising costs.
In matters where publication of the files preceded a nationally broadcast statement, discovery will probe the broadcaster the uncomfortable triad: **What was known, when was it known, and why publish anyway?**
Under *respondeat superior* (let the master answer) the defamation exposure (lawsuit) may likely extend to those who exercised editorial control: scripting, approving, producing, and distributing the publication.
And in cases involving nationwide/global broadcast, plaintiffs often engage in forum shopping to jurisdictions whose courts may enforce procedural guardrails to ensure discovery and plaintiff’s testimony under oath remains relevant about whether he ever travelled to the infamous Island rather than fishing expeditions to humiliate a plaintiff.
For that reason alone, I would hesitate to dismiss such litigation as implausible. @daddyhope
Donald Trump will never sue Trevor Noah. To do so would require him to testify under oath, and that would expose him to questions whose answers would drag into the open far more about his associations with a deeply disturbing circle of paedophiles.
Trump will not sue. Bookmark this tweet.
He threatens lawsuits loudly but frequently avoids cases that would put him under oath or expose him to detailed questioning.
Credit card debt chimbadzo chaicho if you don’t pay it off within the same month you used the credit.
Both @freemanchari and @daddyhope are right, but only half right.
Yes, you need to build a credit score (the visibility point Hopewell makes). But you don’t do that by taking on long-term debt like a 5-year car loan (that’s where Freeman is right to warn people).
The smarter route is to build your credit score using your credit card for small, day-to-day consumables like your Amazon, Walmart - groceries and make sure you pay it off in full before interest is charged.
This way, you become visible to the credit system without being trapped by the ‘chimbadzo’ interest rates.
With a strong credit score, your regular bank, the one receiving your monthly or bi-weekly paycheque, will often notify you (on that banking App on your phone) that you’re pre-approved for a mortgage amount determined by your monthly salary. The mortgage interest rate will then depend on your credit score and whether you’re a first-time home buyer.
Summary recommendation: use credit cards for daily consumables to build visibility, pay them off every month, and reserve long-term, low-interest debt for assets like a home mortgage. By the way a car is a liability.
So here is my experience. It may work or not work. When I was looking for my first car in US, I had been at work for just 1 month. I went into a dealership and they asked me what car I really liked. It was a Dodge Caliber and my car note would have been about $650/month then. My monthly net salary then was ~$3500 and my rent was $600. So a car wld have been the most expensive thing I was gonna pay for... for 5yrs.
I was also thinking about the hullabaloo around credit etc and I went into a bank and asked an investment advisor how best I cld do it. She gave me many options but the one I took was to have a $300 limit secured card that I paid upfront and then use like a credit card. It's the only credit card I have ever owned which they took away from me last year after 15 yrs.
I spoke to a guy I knew who worked at a dealership & he is the one who advised me to go to dealerships last Saturday of the month when majority of Americans are trading in their cars for new ones. I did that and I got a $1000 Dodge Stratus whose biggest fault was a tapped rear view mirror.
Drove that car for 8 months. The only issue I had was my inexperience on driving in snow. I nearly drove into Walmart. In those 8 months, I cld have paid an extra $4200 in a car note, instead I put it aside and bought a 2yr old Camry for $9000. I drove that Camry for 12yrs.
Now the Math. I wld have been on the hook for $39k for that Caliber in 5 yrs. Instead I spent just $9k. The other $30k was freed for me to invest in other things. Which was the down payment for our first home... again we bought a 3-bed townhome which was $172k then and modest enough for us. That one $300 card which we jointly shared with my wife is the only thing we used to build credit for that home. Interest rates were low then ~ 2.4%. We paid off that mortgage in 4yrs. We stayed in that townhome for 7yrs and when we sold it we made a decent inflation adjusted profit.
Having said all this, I still credit the decision not to plunge into debt as the main reason we were able to have a lot of wiggle room for many things. Of course, it wld have been nice to been seen by the boys with a brand new Dodge but I prefered PAYTIENCE.
This is my story. It can be different and better for others.
The Canadians have spoken—through the President & CEO of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association. They’ve weighed in on Carney’s dangerous China “appeasement” deal: mortgaging Canadian jobs while suffocating the domestic auto industry. This marks the beginning of Carney’s political downward spiral. He had little to gain by antagonizing the Trump administration, which still has three years left in the White House.
And this brings us to your astute point: countries must act in their own interests. Carney is no exception to the rule. He now must choose between a $420Billion U.S. export cheque or a $20Billion Beijing receipt that also exports Canadian jobs to Beijing.
Impressive madness to this particular play.
@daddyhope The man remains immensely popular with conservatives yet hated in the extreme, by liberals. Such is the wide disparity of views on one man - who is disrupting the world in a manner that will not be repeated in a generation and a half.
What do you think drives such a stark divide?
Sentiments of Venezuelans
I’m going to say this once, and I don’t care if it makes people uncomfortable.
If you have never lived in Venezuela
If you did not grow up there
If you did not watch your country collapse in real time
If you did not stand in food lines
If you did not watch your parents lose everything they built
If you did not have to leave your home with nothing
Then shut the fuck up.
You do not have an opinion.
Your opinion does not matter.
And you don’t get to lecture anyone about what’s happening there.
I’m Venezuelan.
I lived there most of my life until my early twenties.
I watched my country go from a functioning democracy to full blown socialism right in front of my eyes.
This is not politics to me.
This is trauma.
Before socialism, Venezuela was not perfect, but it worked.
There was trade.
There was money coming in.
There was investment from the US.
There were jobs.
There was food.
There was medicine.
My family had five businesses.
We had our home
We had investments.
We had a future.
Then the government started nationalizing everything.
Private companies were taken.
Foreign investors were pushed out.
Imports were blocked.
Price controls destroyed production.
Corruption exploded.
And everything died.
Not slowly.
Violently.
People didn’t suddenly become poor because of “capitalism” or “the US” or whatever bullshit slogan people like to repeat online.
They became poor because socialism destroyed incentives, destroyed production, destroyed trust, and destroyed hope.
People today in Venezuela are not debating ideology.
They are trying to survive.
They are trying to find food.
Trying to find medication.
Trying to keep their families alive.
So when I see people in the West posting from comfortable homes, full fridges, stable currencies, and safe streets talking about “imperialism” or “US bad” or “Trump this or that”
No.
It’s not complicated.
You’re just ignorant.
China is not rebuilding Venezuela.
Russia is not rebuilding Venezuela.
Cartels are not rebuilding Venezuela.
They are stealing.
They are extracting.
They are draining what’s left.
If the US comes in and reinvests
If refineries get rebuilt
If infrastructure gets restored
If imports open back up
If food, water, and medicine become accessible again
If people can work and earn with dignity
Then yes.
Let them take all the oil they want.
Because at least something gets built instead of destroyed.
This is something to celebrate.
Not because it’s perfect.
But because for the first time in a long time, there is hope.
Hope that families can eat.
Hope that people don’t have to flee their country.
Hope that Venezuela can function again.
If you’ve never lived through a country collapsing
If you’ve never watched socialism destroy everything around you
If you’ve never had to leave your home because staying meant starvation
Then again
Shut the fuck up.
This isn’t theory.
This isn’t politics.
This is lived experience.
By Stephen Subero
Entire populations in countries where China’s extractive greed enrich corrupt leaders while impoverishing the people increasingly resent both China & their own rulers.
The question is simple: does sovereignty belong to the people or is it a right for rulers that Beijing shields?
🇨🇳🇺🇸 The world is asking China a question it has avoided answering for decades:
"When the United States begins to kidnap foreign leaders, invade weaker nations, plunder the resources of small countries, and carry out terrorist attacks with bombs, do you intend to remain silent, or prepare to become the order itself?"
China certainly doesn't want to answer.
Because answering means transforming from a builder of civilization into a guardian of the rules.
But Trump's empire isn't maintaining order; it's creating neo-Nazism: Venezuela is the first, Mexico and Colombia are the second, and ultimately, every small country will understand: peace is not a right, but an insurance policy bought with nuclear weapons.
The world will push China to the forefront, not because of its rise, but because there is no one else.
This is the irony of the new order: the United States proves itself with bombs, while China is forced to prove its civilization with restraint.