Been working on a toy language, Zeus. What I found interesting: ensuring every path returns when a function has a return type.
It was simpler than I thought:
- track if statements fall through.
- returns, conditionals and loops update it.
- validate it at the end of func decl.
@JaromirTesar@CryptoSteveO1 every single *permissionless* blockchain works like this, leaders can order/censor transactions however they want to, it's how these systems were designed. if users don't agree with how validator is building blocks, it's their job to stake with someone else. it's not just Solana.
@hanni_abu@FigoETH Makes no sense for a single entity to run multiple nodes, on Solana there is no staking amount cap, multiple nodes do not provide any benefit for a single entity. And as you .eths like to say, it's also quite expensive to run a Solana validator. So what is this mental gymnastics?
@hanni_abu@FigoETH But why, how can you possibly say that? Helius is quite a big company that needs to run more than just Solana nodes. Of course their infra has redundancy, but that does not mean thay run multiple Solana nodes... Why would they? -
@hanni_abu@FigoETH Where does that say they run multiple Solana nodes? So you've just made that up, honestly not surprised at all based on the tweets I see from you regularly.
@DBCrypt0@toly It's funny how many people have replied to you that what you are spreading is absolute nonsense but your delusion or whatever it is still makes you think that your are the one that is correct here lol
@Kira_sama@toly People were literally saying Solana can be turned off whenever Labs or Foundation decides, and some retards still spread that nonsense. Was blatant lies in the same way that this guy now is lying about eth. He was probably one of those that was saying the same shit about Solana.
@Jikymeow@mert Why? It literally doesn't matter from the perspective of what the chain is capable of. Whether the tx gets reverted depends 99% of times on the program that is called and not chain itself. Basically the only reason for tx failure caused by chain is wallet doesn't have enough SOL.
@hanni_abu@rostyketh@mert@solana Because you, like the op, know nothing about how what you are using work. And that's fine, just don't be a retard on twitter.
@MoleculeLOL League community in a nutshell, just shit on everything, can't remember the last time some update was viewed more positively than negatively
@hanni_abu@toly I have not checked whether the tweet ur quoting is true or not, but let's say it is. The guy claims, no op consumes 1k cus, which is 4x more than p-token transfer which soon will be the standard token implementation. So I don't see how is it not possible to achieve with transfers
@baephine@Weaglelol Why is it crazy? It's a free to play game with pruchasable **cosmetics** that are not needed to play or to be good in the game. You don't have to buy it if you don't want to, someone else will anyway. Why do lol players have to cry about something constantly.
@gphummer@0x_Osprey > generally donโt *do anything.*
That's not true in the slightest. They are reverted precisely because they did read state, and the state was not what the ix expected it to be, so it was reverted. Same as eth, same as on every single blockchain or any state machine.