Andrew Kenneth Fretwell

Stuck in Painful Patterns?
🔑 Gene Keys & Evolutionary Astrology Reveal Soul’s Gifts & Challenges
🧘Inner Freedom with Wu Ji Gong & Inner Alchemy School 👇

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@DuncanKoebrich @SwipeWright @BretWeinstein Yep these naieve folks forget phama has billions in fines for lying!

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@SwipeWright @paulctan @BretWeinstein Or with billions in fines for lying repeatedly. That data does not count for you? Please get over your naievity. Remember the billions in fines was when they we're caught!

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@CredibleCrypto @JanakiramJohnny Why do so many folls here expect @CredibleCrypto to be an exact phycic oracle ?Repeat after me "Markets are probabulities not certanties'" If it was that easy everyone a millionaire! I have learnt to much following him very grateful.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@OfficialBBrooks @Bitcoin_Teddy Of course they did! They want to control everything from top down! For the peoples good of course lol 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

So funny when you listen to the democrats sayimg no kings but here is what they wanted and planed.....total control! From the top down lol 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

https://t.co/YTEXh6AWci

[Bitcoin Teddy @Bitcoin_Teddy]

MARC ANDREESSEN: "We had meetings with the Biden admin where they told us to not even start AI companies because there's no way they'll let them succeed."

JOE ROGAN: "What do you do after a meeting like that?"

MARC ANDREESSEN: "You go endorse Donald Trump."

LMAO

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@CryptoxxxCoffee XRP

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@GuoShenCN7 BTC

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@SteveSchmidtSES Oh my god the stories one tells oneself to keep ones worldview in place? Perhaps its much simpler?

https://t.co/PV6RZpcoCR

[IT Guy @ITGuy1959]

Dear legacy media journalists:

In light of your Scott Pelley lunatic antics; apparently, you all need a reality refresher. So as a public service to your cratering brand, here you go:

1- You do not run the company that employs you. The executive management runs the company, subject to oversight by the owners and/or the stockholders. You are not part of that oversight process.

2- The company that employees you does not owe you an explanation of everything they do, especially with regard to personnel matters. In fact, your own legal / HR department will tell you it is problematic to discuss personnel decisions beyond a need-to-know basis.

3- People don't care who reports the story - they care about the quality of the story. Reading a teleprompter put together by the production team that did the story isn't the galactic-level skill you may think it is.

4- This one should be obvious, but when journalists are the story versus reporting the story, you all failed.

5- When you run a story that is critical of an individual, administration, or institution; allowing the subject of the story to comment ahead of time is not "injecting political bias into the story." It's Journalism 101, which apparently is no longer taught in Journalism 101.

6- We really don't care what a "former producer" or a "former correspondent" thinks about anything. There's often a good reason they are a "former" something, and that reason usually undercuts their credibility.

7- This one also seems obvious, but you're subject to - and only subject to - the same employment laws that affect everyone else in every other business. When the First Amendment was written, the "press" referred to the printing press, not some special class of citizenry that is exempt from laws that affect everyone else.

8- When you have a show that suffered one of the worst scandals in journalism history - revolving around the literal forging of fake memos - don't tell us it's a gold standard that never had a blemish in its history. You just look dumb when you do that.

You're welcome.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@MarcoFoster_ @TaiChi_John Nope
https://t.co/PV6RZpcoCR

[IT Guy @ITGuy1959]

Dear legacy media journalists:

In light of your Scott Pelley lunatic antics; apparently, you all need a reality refresher. So as a public service to your cratering brand, here you go:

1- You do not run the company that employs you. The executive management runs the company, subject to oversight by the owners and/or the stockholders. You are not part of that oversight process.

2- The company that employees you does not owe you an explanation of everything they do, especially with regard to personnel matters. In fact, your own legal / HR department will tell you it is problematic to discuss personnel decisions beyond a need-to-know basis.

3- People don't care who reports the story - they care about the quality of the story. Reading a teleprompter put together by the production team that did the story isn't the galactic-level skill you may think it is.

4- This one should be obvious, but when journalists are the story versus reporting the story, you all failed.

5- When you run a story that is critical of an individual, administration, or institution; allowing the subject of the story to comment ahead of time is not "injecting political bias into the story." It's Journalism 101, which apparently is no longer taught in Journalism 101.

6- We really don't care what a "former producer" or a "former correspondent" thinks about anything. There's often a good reason they are a "former" something, and that reason usually undercuts their credibility.

7- This one also seems obvious, but you're subject to - and only subject to - the same employment laws that affect everyone else in every other business. When the First Amendment was written, the "press" referred to the printing press, not some special class of citizenry that is exempt from laws that affect everyone else.

8- When you have a show that suffered one of the worst scandals in journalism history - revolving around the literal forging of fake memos - don't tell us it's a gold standard that never had a blemish in its history. You just look dumb when you do that.

You're welcome.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@RealMattCarey Nope not even close

https://t.co/PV6RZpcoCR

[IT Guy @ITGuy1959]

Dear legacy media journalists:

In light of your Scott Pelley lunatic antics; apparently, you all need a reality refresher. So as a public service to your cratering brand, here you go:

1- You do not run the company that employs you. The executive management runs the company, subject to oversight by the owners and/or the stockholders. You are not part of that oversight process.

2- The company that employees you does not owe you an explanation of everything they do, especially with regard to personnel matters. In fact, your own legal / HR department will tell you it is problematic to discuss personnel decisions beyond a need-to-know basis.

3- People don't care who reports the story - they care about the quality of the story. Reading a teleprompter put together by the production team that did the story isn't the galactic-level skill you may think it is.

4- This one should be obvious, but when journalists are the story versus reporting the story, you all failed.

5- When you run a story that is critical of an individual, administration, or institution; allowing the subject of the story to comment ahead of time is not "injecting political bias into the story." It's Journalism 101, which apparently is no longer taught in Journalism 101.

6- We really don't care what a "former producer" or a "former correspondent" thinks about anything. There's often a good reason they are a "former" something, and that reason usually undercuts their credibility.

7- This one also seems obvious, but you're subject to - and only subject to - the same employment laws that affect everyone else in every other business. When the First Amendment was written, the "press" referred to the printing press, not some special class of citizenry that is exempt from laws that affect everyone else.

8- When you have a show that suffered one of the worst scandals in journalism history - revolving around the literal forging of fake memos - don't tell us it's a gold standard that never had a blemish in its history. You just look dumb when you do that.

You're welcome.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@WesSmith123 Nope not even close

https://t.co/PV6RZpcoCR

[IT Guy @ITGuy1959]

Dear legacy media journalists:

In light of your Scott Pelley lunatic antics; apparently, you all need a reality refresher. So as a public service to your cratering brand, here you go:

1- You do not run the company that employs you. The executive management runs the company, subject to oversight by the owners and/or the stockholders. You are not part of that oversight process.

2- The company that employees you does not owe you an explanation of everything they do, especially with regard to personnel matters. In fact, your own legal / HR department will tell you it is problematic to discuss personnel decisions beyond a need-to-know basis.

3- People don't care who reports the story - they care about the quality of the story. Reading a teleprompter put together by the production team that did the story isn't the galactic-level skill you may think it is.

4- This one should be obvious, but when journalists are the story versus reporting the story, you all failed.

5- When you run a story that is critical of an individual, administration, or institution; allowing the subject of the story to comment ahead of time is not "injecting political bias into the story." It's Journalism 101, which apparently is no longer taught in Journalism 101.

6- We really don't care what a "former producer" or a "former correspondent" thinks about anything. There's often a good reason they are a "former" something, and that reason usually undercuts their credibility.

7- This one also seems obvious, but you're subject to - and only subject to - the same employment laws that affect everyone else in every other business. When the First Amendment was written, the "press" referred to the printing press, not some special class of citizenry that is exempt from laws that affect everyone else.

8- When you have a show that suffered one of the worst scandals in journalism history - revolving around the literal forging of fake memos - don't tell us it's a gold standard that never had a blemish in its history. You just look dumb when you do that.

You're welcome.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@GeoffRBennett Nope

https://t.co/PV6RZpcoCR

[IT Guy @ITGuy1959]

Dear legacy media journalists:

In light of your Scott Pelley lunatic antics; apparently, you all need a reality refresher. So as a public service to your cratering brand, here you go:

1- You do not run the company that employs you. The executive management runs the company, subject to oversight by the owners and/or the stockholders. You are not part of that oversight process.

2- The company that employees you does not owe you an explanation of everything they do, especially with regard to personnel matters. In fact, your own legal / HR department will tell you it is problematic to discuss personnel decisions beyond a need-to-know basis.

3- People don't care who reports the story - they care about the quality of the story. Reading a teleprompter put together by the production team that did the story isn't the galactic-level skill you may think it is.

4- This one should be obvious, but when journalists are the story versus reporting the story, you all failed.

5- When you run a story that is critical of an individual, administration, or institution; allowing the subject of the story to comment ahead of time is not "injecting political bias into the story." It's Journalism 101, which apparently is no longer taught in Journalism 101.

6- We really don't care what a "former producer" or a "former correspondent" thinks about anything. There's often a good reason they are a "former" something, and that reason usually undercuts their credibility.

7- This one also seems obvious, but you're subject to - and only subject to - the same employment laws that affect everyone else in every other business. When the First Amendment was written, the "press" referred to the printing press, not some special class of citizenry that is exempt from laws that affect everyone else.

8- When you have a show that suffered one of the worst scandals in journalism history - revolving around the literal forging of fake memos - don't tell us it's a gold standard that never had a blemish in its history. You just look dumb when you do that.

You're welcome.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@ITGuy1959 Book marking this to reply to all X posts from the left leaning victim outrage. Thank you for the absolute clarity and common sense.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@BrianScott86975 @MarkHalperin @CBSNews @bariweiss @nytimes Lol so funny .....have to agree with the NY times, oh how the mighty have fallen. Lets also remember @bariweiss was a left of center journalist who had to leave due to the woke take over, that should clarify it for most folks.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@neeratanden So great 60 minutes will be returnung back to what it was known for 20 years ago. Neutral investigative reporting. About time...sick of the left ideology being promoted as factual reporting and its so dam obvious to anyone with any objectivity.

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@RBReich Lol of course its such a high standard of impartial reporting NOT

https://t.co/Yl7a83O6rt

[Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger]

👀

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@iFaisalKarim @elonmusk Well said

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@zarahussain999 @elonmusk Of course it is look at what happaned lol

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@0kIndoor @HowardKurtz Yep the left are blind to their lack of objectivity

[Andrew Kenneth Fretwell @dna_activate]

@jonesdel @shellenberger @greggutfeld Yes spot on.