@Chris_Dujarric@blackfireio right now we are still in free, surely considering to upgrade. But that is actually the point, 1 day is as much worth as 30 days to be honest - you either profile your way through the task in one day ( usually ) or you happen to compare "how was it back then" ( > 30 for sure )
@blackfireio i really love your service and convenience - thank you! If i may, the only thing i would suggest is, if it is really worth cutting down the rentation time that much. IMHO this is one of the USPs to xprof/xdebug profile - you can compare, store, improve. ty!
Examples on how to speed up @Docker based development of @WordPress and @laravelphp using https://t.co/ebKGluwkNt at https://t.co/KNnznCTgeL - thank you for writing about it @kovah_kvh
Another article on how to use https://t.co/ebKGluwkNt for @drupal development under #macOS https://t.co/IhfRSyNNbX - thank you for writing this up @motobreath
Finally 0.5.11 has been released - this should be a quality release: https://t.co/peykLu8mGm - you should upgrade if you run 0.5.8 or later. Thank you for all the contributions and community effort !
A new release is coming out soon 0.5.11 - i invite any testers to try out 0.5.11-beta2 and give some feedback before it lands on your desk a broken fashion. Please test run it - thanks!
0.5.10 is about to hit the streets, please help testing 0.5.10-beta1 https://t.co/LJec7JjURN - this release regression bugs from 0.5.9 and fixes windows/linux compatibility and some OSX glitches, exit codes and things https://t.co/Ewm9Wj1yN8 - thank you for the help / contribs.
@th0masr Even though one might think i am biased, i'am really not. I would be one of the happiest alive if i could remove the docker-sync from this world - just use docker on macOS - without extras. Be it docker-toolbox, d4m or native or whatever. The best solution is.
@th0masr .. layer on top - the NATed docker network which overcomplicates a lot of other tasks too. NFS is slower then OSXFS too, so for now, vagrant (docker-toolbox) is just the slower, more overhead solution. I have nothing against vagrant - i love it. but not for this task (IMHO)
@th0masr I would second anybody backing off of macOS if Docker development is the one key task daily. But if you have other reasons for macOS, like we have, i found the vagrant solutions worse then d4m. VBox is slower then xhyve CPU wise, its a thicker layer and it adds an extra ..
@DanWahlin@NutonDev@Docker I cannot speak for your docker-application/container/app but at least, docker-sync should be tuned to sync/watch as few files as possible. Exclude vendor/node_modules - also use the default native_osx strategy, its far better in its CPU usage