Indian scientists ‘see red’ over a reincarnation discussion at the IIT Mandi conference on Mind, Brain and Consciousness at which I spoke last week (see below).
There was a breakout session on reincarnation, near death and out-of-body experiences which I didn’t attend. But I do believe reincarnation, NDE and OOBs are possible. Consciousness in the Orch OR theory occurs at the level of spacetime geometry, normally between the ears. But when the brain and body fail it is conceivable the quantum information dissipates but remains entangled as a ‘Quantum soul’. https://t.co/rSadYTaiQq There’s a fair amount of evidence from pediatric psychiatry. Kids recount details of past lives which sometimes correspond with birthmarks related to the cause of death.
I’m offering to debate any of the incensed Indian scientists, possibly at The Science of Consciousness conference in San Diego in October.
https://t.co/nmDUsktZvx on whether reincarnation is scientifically possible.
Let’s see if they chicken out like @davidchalmers42@anilkseth and Christof Koch have.
https://t.co/LeapKnS9gH
Looks like the options thing is happening already!
See also: various people thinking through and building different versions of the idea in the thread: https://t.co/gFNEvCbHct
Though I do strongly urge that if any of these get on mainnet quickly, we formally verify it first. I hope @vyperlang and/or https://t.co/OMFlWRqJda folks ( @Fricoben) can help!
(Also, now is a good time to be thinking about robustness-optimized oracles)
https://t.co/j1dxLV4Pn4
Twenty-five experts from academia and industry put together this (monster, 150+-page) survey on the bidirectional impact of crypto and AI. Visit https://t.co/MPdy1bIoGw to read it, peruse the executive summary—or chat with a chatbot about it.
“physicists are learning that the two defining features of quantum mechanics, entanglement and magic, correspond to the two defining features of space, its shape and its flexibility.”
https://t.co/TSgJdhX5zd
What if the very foundations of our cosmic theories are fundamentally flawed? To all the Physics lovers and curious minds, you have to check out this elegant discussion between Brian Cox and Nobel Laureate Roger Penrose.
From the true nature of the Big Bang and spacetime to Penrose’s mind-bending theories on how quantum mechanics shapes human consciousness, they question how radically our view of reality might need to change. https://t.co/tmlMehA6fH
#Physics #Cosmology #RogerPenrose #BrianCox #QuantumConsciousness #Spacetime #BigBang #TheoreticalPhysics #ScienceCommunication #Astrophysics #RemoteFuture
More people should know about the Interfold.
It's basically what I've been yelling at people to build with the MACI ideas ( https://t.co/mlDy84zXQo ) for almost a decade, and now it exists, in a generalized form.
The idea is: a privacy protocol optimized for things like voting (and other use cases eg. secret-ballot auctions). The mechanism generates a threshold encryption key, and people send in their votes onchain, using a ZKP to prove eligibility. An arbitrary computation on the votes gets run inside FHE, and then threshold-decrypted.
From what I can tell (the docs are good https://t.co/adzwK6ezMN ), it gets pretty optimal security guarantees:
* Voter anonymity can be made unconditional if eligibility is proven with ZK-SNARKs
* Censorship resistance is guaranteed by ethereum (votes can be posted directly onchain, and there's a proof that all posted votes are taking into account)
* The correctness of the outputted result can be ensured via ZK over FHE
* Liveness and coercion resistance depend on M-of-N honesty; unavoidable given present-day technology
The main limitation is that today "ZK over FHE" is only properly available for additive vote tallying, as it's too expensive for computations that involve multiplication or other more complicated manipulation at the moment. There's work in progress on slashing-based / optimistic computation for such situations.
(And of course ideally in the long term we'd figure out obfuscation so you can get rid of the M-of-N committees😃)
LLM Wiki v0.4.16 Release 🎉🎉🎉
Greatly improved knowledge graph rendering performance, making browsing and searching much smoother.
https://t.co/FHCxtJJm06
Can we model Buddhist awakening with mathematical physics?
Our latest paper proposes such a model, using the quantum formulation of the free energy principle to formalise the stable recognition of emptiness.
Link and thread below 👇
"If consciousness can survive brain death, then materialism dies." -- my new piece in Nature (reviewing "The brain, in theory"): https://t.co/oJypUfGTaT
Life on the Edge. Creatures from mathematics. We are Not Alone.
Experimenting with simulated ecosystems.
By @spacefillerart, https://t.co/4WDJ9kDfJz, Used with permission.
Brains seem to be wired so that signals are “just right”. This paper argues that there is a special “sweet spot” in how the brain is organized that keeps activity balanced.
https://t.co/kIIAqCbYAM
#neuroscience
@StuartHameroff Neural activity seems to be coordinated and constrained by the electric field arising from all charged structures in the cytoskeleton, including microtubules , and processes like mechanotransduction, resulting from cytoelectric coupling https://t.co/yH4UXWbpgT
Carlo Rovelli correctly pushes back against the notion that consciousness is ‘above and beyond’ normal brain activities. Actually, consciousness is
‘below and inside’ what are considered the normal membrane and synaptic activities of neurons and glia, occurring in faster, deeper quantum nonlocal processes in microtubules. And qualia, according to Carlo’s colleague in
quantum gravity, Nobel laureate Sir Roger Penrose, occur precisely there, at the level of loop quantum gravity at the Planck scale.
That’s within the realm of science but still quite a hard problem. Carlo do you have a problem with our Orch OR theory ?
https://t.co/eGxdWy25jQ
https://t.co/BLRNhgrsjL
@carlorovelli