IVERMECTIN: FULL DOSAGE SCHEDULE FOR CANCER & PREVENTION
1000s of people use Dr. William Makis MD’s IVERMECTIN dosing chart. Here’s a clear, categorized breakdown based on body weight (mg/kg per day).
LOW DOSE: ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:**
- Cancers in remission
- Strong family history or genetic predisposition
- Prophylaxis (preventive)
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Tess Lawrie reported a Stage 3 ovarian cancer case treated with chemo + 12 mg ivermectin daily. Tumor marker CA125 dropped from 288 to 22 after 2 months and the tumor vanished.
MEDIUM DOSE: 1.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Starting dose for **most cancers** (lung, pancreatic, renal cell, gastric, etc.).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty’s 70-year-old prostate cancer patient (PSA 89) took 45 mg/day (plus lactoferrin). After two months PSA fell to 10.9.
HIGH DOSE: 2.0 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Very aggressive cancers (leukemia, pancreatic, brain cancers).
**Side effects:** No long-term side effects reported.
**Example:** Dr. Allan Landrito’s Stage 4 gallbladder cancer patient took 2 mg/kg daily for 14 months — cancer disappeared.
VERY HIGH DOSE: ≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day
**Best for:** Extensive metastatic disease, extremely poor prognosis, or certain brain cancers.
**Side effects:** Possible short-term & transient visual effects (usually resolve in a few days).
**Example:** Dr. Shankara Chetty treated a patient with 2.5 mg/kg/day — no side effects reported.
**Quick conversion example (for a 60 kg / 132 lb person):**
- Low: ≤30 mg/day
- Medium: 60 mg/day (≈5��12 mg tablets or 1 teaspoon liquid)
- High: 120 mg/day
- Very High: ≥150 mg/day
Many anecdotal reports exist of long-term daily use (months to over a year) with no serious toxicity, but individual responses vary.
Always work with a knowledgeable clinician, especially if you have pre-existing conditions (e.g., vision issues or glaucoma). This is for educational purposes only.
Share to spread awareness — information is power. 💊
BREAKING NEWS: Most CENSORED paper on EARTH - The Lancet-Censored "SUDDEN DEATH" COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Paper has been peer reviewed an published!!
It has been two years now, with unprecedented censorship from Lancet and another Elsevier Journal which pulled this paper at the last minute!!
This has never been seen in scientific publishing before!
325 AUTOPSIES of recently COVID-19 Vaccinated people who "DIED SUDDENLY" (largest autopsy series in the world)
"mean time from vaccination to DEATH was 14.3 days"
"73.9% of deaths were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 Vaccination."
Yes, COVID-19 Vaccines result in SUDDEN DEATHS early after vaccination (they also do it over the long term too)
Thanks to @P_McCulloughMD and @NicHulscher for the countless hours of hard work it took to get this published. Congratulations to all my co-authors!
This is a monumental achievement in the face of historically unprecedented scientific censorship.
Yes, COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines cause SUDDEN DEATH and most are within the first 2 weeks - that's why they were labeled UNVACCINATED.
This paper proves WHY THEY DID IT.
They hid the deaths.
But we got them!!
Finally!! 🙏
#DiedSuddenly
Longtime Democrat Bill Ackman Fires Off a Dire Warning to America
He says the Democratic Party's policies are so destructive that they're indistinguishable from what our worst enemies would do to "destroy America from within."
Ackman then dropped the receipts with 33 damning examples:
1. Open borders, unvetted immigrants.
2. Inflationary spending, rising deficit.
3. Chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal, loss of life.
4.Excessive regulations stifling business.
5. Release of violent criminals without bail.
6. Decriminalizing shoplifting, promoting lawlessness.
7. Anti-fracking policies, rising energy costs.
8. DEI ideologies dividing society.
9. Gender fluidity education, harm to children’s health.
10. Support for riots, school closures for COVID-19.
11. Anti-American, anti-Israel protests unchecked.
12. Exploding antisemitism, no action.
13. Vaccine mandates, censoring scientific dissent.
14. Censorship of free speech.
15. Legal attacks on political opponents.
16. Defunding police, loss of public safety.
17. Subsidizing inferior tech, hurting innovation.
18. Government overreach in private sector solutions.
19. Banning gas-powered cars and stoves.
20. No response to terrorist attacks on Americans.
21. Withholding arms from key Middle East ally.
22. Lifting sanctions on adversaries, bad hostage deal.
23. Removing terrorists from watchlists.
24. Lying about president’s cognitive health.
25. Ignoring unhealthy food policies.
26. Proliferation of risky vaccines for children.
27. No liability for pharma industry, excessive vaccines.
28. Convincing minority youth they are victims.
29. Inadequate protection for alternative candidates.
30. Blocking alternative candidates from ballots.
31. Backroom selection of Democratic nominee.
32. Choosing inferior candidates over better options.
33. Opposing voter ID and citizenship proof.
BREAKING NEWS: First-in-the-World Ivermectin, Mebendazole and Fenbendazole Protocol in Cancer has been peer-reviewed and published on Sep.19, 2024!
The future of Cancer Treatment starts NOW.
My thanks to lead authors Ilyes Baghli and Pierrick Martinez for their incredible inspired work, FLCCC’s Dr.Paul Marik for his extensive work on repurposed drugs and every co-author who worked hard to bring this paper to life.
I hope that this peer-reviewed paper lays the groundwork for a brand new future for Cancer Treatment.
Many of you know that I have been helping thousands of Cancer patients with high dose Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole.
We are already starting to see incredible successes with these repurposed drugs.
Mainstream Oncology collapsed after the rollout of contaminated COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines.
Most Oncologists abandoned their Hippocratic Oath, gave contaminated mRNA Vaccines to all their cancer patients and took the mRNA jabs themselves.
Some Oncologists have now developed mRNA Induced Cardiac arrests, blood clots and Turbo Cancer. Others have already died suddenly.
These Oncologists buried their heads in the sand and abandoned everything that it takes to be a good competent doctor.
However, there are doctors who are blazing a new path into the future. See you there! ��
@TuckerCarlson @joerogan
I understand the need for empathy when it comes to transgender athletes. I understand that Iman Khalid is DSD and obviously this must be very challenging in ways we can’t imagine. That said, where is the empathy for women with XX chromosomes who train their entire life only to be potentially met with an unfair playing field and in extreme cases, safety concerns.
It’s entirely unacceptable that the rights and opinions of ALL stakeholders, explicitly including xx female athletes are not being considered. The punishment and reprisal of these women for voicing their feelings on the matter is bordering on fascistic. Their concerns should be closely considered as an entire generation of upcoming girls may never get the opportunity to fulfill their dreams no matter how hard they work. The scholarships, titles, world records, prize money, Olympic opportunities, endorsement deals could all eventually become out of reach. This looks like a world without Serena Williams, Lindsay Vonn, Simone Biles, Ronda Rousey and many more.
Only when we agree that these issues must be addressed can we truly work toward solutions for inclusion, safety, and fairness. Each governing body for all sports needs to grow a spine, look at the data, and seek out solutions. Stop gaslighting the world by claiming there is no cause for concern. Only a flat earther would actually believes this! People just fear retribution should they point out a naked emperor.
Two years ago, a mass shooting killed 6 people in Sacramento. The shooter, who fired 28 rounds, should have been prison. But he was let out under an early release law enabled by Kamala Harris.
Harris, as California AG, described Prop. 57 as applying to "non-violent" offenders. This was a lie; law enforcement groups said so urgently at the time. And this case proves they were right. Five years before the mass shooting, the perpetrator was convicted of domestic violence, but he served less than half his 10-year sentence because of Prop. 57.
Here's how the local prosecutor described that earlier offense, which began with him breaking into his girlfriend's home: “He located her hiding in her bedroom closet and hit her repeatedly with a closed fist on the face, head, and body, causing visible injuries. He then dragged her out of the home by her hair to an awaiting car. After he put her in the car, he assaulted her with a belt."
According to Harris, this was a non-violent crime. That is the lie she told voters, directly in the ballot description. That false description is why the proposition became law and has allowed violent offenders like this to re-offend, again and again. It's one reason why California has a violent crime rate that far exceeds the national average.
I’m going to make my stance abundantly clear.
I don’t care who she slept with. Don’t care about her laugh, I am not going to dehumanize her or disrespect her based on her personal life. Who doesn’t have a past and she is grown. Don’t care if she is too Black for some and not Black enough for others.
My decision not to even consider her is based solely on the following:
- She created a bail fund for rioters in 2020 who destroyed cities to push a politics agenda. That is terrorism and she helped them skate instead of condemning them.
- She supported two propositions in CA that exacerbated crime and made it incredibly difficult to for law enforcement to stop crime. As well as No Cash Bail, even against the will of California voters. Which also put Californians in danger.
- She was tasked with solving the border crisis. She only went to the border because she was pressured and all she did was peek at it to find “root causes”. Which is progressive code for “I ain’t gonna do 💩 about this.”
- She engages in race baiting and fear mongering. Which lets me know she has zero solutions to the many issues American’s are facing right now.
- She is even farther left than Joe Biden.
That’s why. I don’t believe she is ready to lead and her politics will slide America further down the crapper.
Not because she is a woman. I would gladly and without pause vote for a woman for president. Some of the greatest leaders I ever worked for were women. Just can’t vote for this one because of who she, is not her gender.
Has nothing to do with her race. I’m always proud when I see Black people elevate. I don’t just want any Black person. I don’t care about color when it comes to leadership. I just want the leader best capable to lead.